What Are You or Who Are You? The Emergence of Social Interaction between Dog and an Unidentified Moving Object (UMO)

Robots offer new possibilities for investigating animal social behaviour. This method enhances controllability and reproducibility of experimental techniques, and it allows also the experimental separation of the effects of bodily appearance (embodiment) and behaviour. In the present study we examined dogs’ interactive behaviour in a problem solving task (in which the dog has no access to the food) with three different social partners, two of which were robots and the third a human behaving in a robot-like manner. The Mechanical UMO (Unidentified Moving Object) and the Mechanical Human differed only in their embodiment, but showed similar behaviour toward the dog. In contrast, the Social UMO was interactive, showed contingent responsiveness and goal-directed behaviour and moved along varied routes. The dogs showed shorter looking and touching duration, but increased gaze alternation toward the Mechanical Human than to the Mechanical UMO. This suggests that dogs’ interactive behaviour may have been affected by previous experience with typical humans. We found that dogs also looked longer and showed more gaze alternations between the food and the Social UMO compared to the Mechanical UMO. These results suggest that dogs form expectations about an unfamiliar moving object within a short period of time and they recognise some social aspects of UMOs’ behaviour. This is the first evidence that interactive behaviour of a robot is important for evoking dogs’ social responsiveness.

[1]  Á. Miklósi,et al.  A Simple Reason for a Big Difference Wolves Do Not Look Back at Humans, but Dogs Do , 2003, Current Biology.

[2]  D. Rakison,et al.  Developmental origin of the animate-inanimate distinction. , 2001, Psychological bulletin.

[3]  Cynthia Breazeal,et al.  A simulation-theory inspired social learning system for interactive characters , 2005, ROMAN 2005. IEEE International Workshop on Robot and Human Interactive Communication, 2005..

[4]  Hiroyuki Ishii,et al.  Experimental Study on Task Teaching to Real Rats Through Interaction with a Robotic Rat , 2006, SAB.

[5]  Karen M Kostan The evolution of mutualistic interspecific communication: assessment and management across species. , 2002, Journal of comparative psychology.

[6]  Gustav Kramer,et al.  Beobachtungen über paarungsbiologie und soziales verhalten von mauereidechsen , 1937, Zeitschrift für Morphologie und Ökologie der Tiere.

[7]  Iain D. Couzin,et al.  A novel method for investigating the collective behaviour of fish: introducing ‘Robofish’ , 2010, Behavioral Ecology and Sociobiology.

[8]  John E. Opfer,et al.  Identifying living and sentient kinds from dynamic information: the case of goal-directed versus aimless autonomous movement in conceptual change , 2002, Cognition.

[9]  Ana B. Chica,et al.  Attentional Routes to Conscious Perception , 2012, Front. Psychology.

[10]  Ádám Miklósi,et al.  Domestic dogs (Canis familiaris) flexibly adjust their human-directed behavior to the actions of their human partners in a problem situation , 2011, Animal Cognition.

[11]  F. Kaplan,et al.  Social behaviour of dogs encountering AIBO, an animal-like robot in a neutral and in a feeding situation , 2004, Behavioural Processes.

[12]  Alan C. Kamil,et al.  On the Proper Definition of Cognitive Ethology , 1998 .

[13]  J. Deneubourg,et al.  Interactive robots in experimental biology. , 2011, Trends in ecology & evolution.

[14]  Julie Adams 14th IEEE International Workshop on Robot and Human Interactive Communication , 2005, INTR.

[15]  Márta Gácsi,et al.  Provided for Non-commercial Research and Educational Use Only. Not for Reproduction, Distribution or Commercial Use. the Dog as a Model for Understanding Human Social Behavior , 2022 .

[16]  H A Isack,et al.  Honeyguides and Honey Gatherers: Interspecific Communication in a Symbiotic Relationship , 1989, Science.

[17]  Cecilia Heyes,et al.  Simple minds: a qualified defence of associative learning , 2012, Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences.

[18]  William Rowan,et al.  The Study of Instinct , 1953 .

[19]  P. Narins,et al.  Bimodal signal requisite for agonistic behavior in a dart-poison frog, Epipedobates femoralis , 2003, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[20]  Thomas E. Reimchen,et al.  Behavioural responses of Canis familiaris to different tail lengths of a remotely-controlled life-size dog replica , 2008 .

[21]  Y. Munakata Challenges to the Violation-of-Expectation Paradigm: Throwing the Conceptual Baby Out With the Perceptual Processing Bathwater? , 2000, Infancy : the official journal of the International Society on Infant Studies.

[22]  H. Evans The Study of Instinct , 1952 .

[23]  Márta Gácsi,et al.  On the Utilization of Social Animals as a Model for Social Robotics , 2012, Front. Psychology.

[24]  Gabriella Lakatos,et al.  Comprehension and utilisation of pointing gestures and gazing in dog–human communication in relatively complex situations , 2011, Animal Cognition.

[25]  Redouan Bshary,et al.  Interspecific Communicative and Coordinated Hunting between Groupers and Giant Moray Eels in the Red Sea , 2006, PLoS biology.

[26]  A. Endress,et al.  The Social Sense: Susceptibility to Others’ Beliefs in Human Infants and Adults , 2010, Science.

[27]  V. Csányi,et al.  Intentional behaviour in dog-human communication: an experimental analysis of “showing” behaviour in the dog , 2000, Animal Cognition.

[28]  Illah R. Nourbakhsh,et al.  A survey of socially interactive robots , 2003, Robotics Auton. Syst..

[29]  Rolf Pfeifer,et al.  Understanding intelligence , 2020, Inequality by Design.

[30]  A. Meltzoff Understanding the Intentions of Others: Re-Enactment of Intended Acts by 18-Month-Old Children. , 1995, Developmental psychology.

[31]  Dennis Saleh Zs , 2001 .

[32]  Tom Ziemke,et al.  On the Role of Emotion in Embodied Cognitive Architectures: From Organisms to Robots , 2009, Cognitive Computation.

[33]  Florence Gaunet,et al.  How do guide dogs and pet dogs (Canis familiaris) ask their owners for their toy and for playing? , 2010, Animal Cognition.

[34]  S. Partan,et al.  Wild tree squirrels respond with multisensory enhancement to conspecific robot alarm behaviour , 2009, Animal Behaviour.

[35]  Rajesh P. N. Rao,et al.  "Social" robots are psychological agents for infants: A test of gaze following , 2010, Neural Networks.

[36]  Dario Floreano,et al.  Using robots to understand social behaviour , 2013, Biological reviews of the Cambridge Philosophical Society.

[37]  G. Csibra,et al.  Goal attribution without agency cues: the perception of ‘pure reason’ in infancy , 1999, Cognition.

[38]  P ? ? ? ? ? ? ? % ? ? ? ? , 1991 .

[39]  G. G. Stokes "J." , 1890, The New Yale Book of Quotations.