Negative selection algorithm based methodology for online structural health monitoring

Abstract Even small damages in engineered systems can endanger the users or lead to significant economic costs. The detection of damage existence is only the first task within the Damage Identification strategy, nonetheless, it is still very complex, especially for Civil Engineering products. The present study is devoted to the analysis of a global methodology for damage detection based on a recently developed version of the Negative Selection Algorithm (NSA). Given any new monitored data measured from the system, the methodology addresses the one-class classification problem by labelling it as normal or abnormal, thus potentially damaged. The strategy is independent of the engineered system under investigation and of the damage-sensitive features used to assess the state, as long as only two features per time are analysed by the classifier. The methodology includes a set of features meant to tackle typical shortcomings and open issues which might prevent an effective application of NSA to damage detection. Some of them are shared with other soft computing techniques for classifications. Finally, the methodology is applied to the data collected from a scaled masonry arch built and tested at the University of Minho (Portugal). The datasets are used to validate the algorithm features, to compare the NSA with other well-known classification algorithms and to simulate a real monitoring to assess the readiness of the algorithm response.

[1]  Paulo B. Lourenço,et al.  Deterministically generated negative selection algorithm for damage detection in civil engineering systems , 2019, Engineering Structures.

[2]  John N. Hooker,et al.  Testing heuristics: We have it all wrong , 1995, J. Heuristics.

[3]  Fernando Niño,et al.  Recent Advances in Artificial Immune Systems: Models and Applications , 2011, Appl. Soft Comput..

[4]  Rune Brincker,et al.  Vibration Based Inspection of Civil Engineering Structures , 1993 .

[5]  Dawei Wang,et al.  Optimization of Real-Valued Self Set for Anomaly Detection Using Gaussian Distribution , 2009, AICI.

[6]  Mauricio G. C. Resende,et al.  Designing and reporting on computational experiments with heuristic methods , 1995, J. Heuristics.

[7]  Catherine C. McGeoch Feature Article - Toward an Experimental Method for Algorithm Simulation , 1996, INFORMS J. Comput..

[8]  Edward Sazonov,et al.  Damage detection and identification in smart structures using SVM and ANN , 2012, Smart Structures and Materials + Nondestructive Evaluation and Health Monitoring.

[9]  Zhou Ji,et al.  Applicability issues of the real-valued negative selection algorithms , 2006, GECCO '06.

[10]  Zhou Ji,et al.  Revisiting Negative Selection Algorithms , 2007, Evolutionary Computation.

[11]  Claudia Eckert,et al.  Is negative selection appropriate for anomaly detection? , 2005, GECCO '05.

[12]  Charles R. Farrar,et al.  Structural Health Monitoring Using Statistical Pattern Recognition Techniques , 2001 .

[13]  Zhibin Lin,et al.  Data-driven support vector machine with optimization techniques for structural health monitoring and damage detection , 2017, KSCE Journal of Civil Engineering.

[14]  Michael Döhler,et al.  Statistical methods for damage detection applied to civil structures , 2017 .

[15]  Christopher J. C. Burges,et al.  A Tutorial on Support Vector Machines for Pattern Recognition , 1998, Data Mining and Knowledge Discovery.

[16]  Keith Worden,et al.  An introduction to structural health monitoring , 2007, Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society A: Mathematical, Physical and Engineering Sciences.

[17]  Stephanie Forrest,et al.  Architecture for an Artificial Immune System , 2000, Evolutionary Computation.

[18]  Alan S. Perelson,et al.  Self-nonself discrimination in a computer , 1994, Proceedings of 1994 IEEE Computer Society Symposium on Research in Security and Privacy.

[19]  Haoxiang He,et al.  Structural damage detection with wavelet support vector machine: introduction and applications , 2007 .