Control of fixation duration during scene viewing by interaction of foveal and peripheral processing.

Processing in our visual system is functionally segregated, with the fovea specialized in processing fine detail (high spatial frequencies) for object identification, and the periphery in processing coarse information (low frequencies) for spatial orienting and saccade target selection. Here we investigate the consequences of this functional segregation for the control of fixation durations during scene viewing. Using gaze-contingent displays, we applied high-pass or low-pass filters to either the central or the peripheral visual field and compared eye-movement patterns with an unfiltered control condition. In contrast with predictions from functional segregation, fixation durations were unaffected when the critical information for vision was strongly attenuated (foveal low-pass and peripheral high-pass filtering); fixation durations increased, however, when useful information was left mostly intact by the filter (foveal high-pass and peripheral low-pass filtering). These patterns of results are difficult to explain under the assumption that fixation durations are controlled by foveal processing difficulty. As an alternative explanation, we developed the hypothesis that the interaction of foveal and peripheral processing controls fixation duration. To investigate the viability of this explanation, we implemented a computational model with two compartments, approximating spatial aspects of processing by foveal and peripheral activations that change according to a small set of dynamical rules. The model reproduced distributions of fixation durations from all experimental conditions by variation of few parameters that were affected by specific filtering conditions.

[1]  C. J. Erkelens,et al.  Control of fixation duration in a simple search task , 1996, Perception & psychophysics.

[2]  J. Robson,et al.  Probability summation and regional variation in contrast sensitivity across the visual field , 1981, Vision Research.

[3]  Ralf Engbert,et al.  Mindless reading revisited: An analysis based on the SWIFT model of eye-movement control , 2009, Vision Research.

[4]  Andrew Hollingworth,et al.  Eye Movements During Scene Viewing: An Overview , 1998 .

[5]  P M van Diepen,et al.  Scene Exploration with Fourier-Filtered Peripheral Information , 1998, Perception.

[6]  Roland J. Baddeley,et al.  High frequency edges (but not contrast) predict where we fixate: A Bayesian system identification analysis , 2006, Vision Research.

[7]  John K. Tsotsos,et al.  Modeling Visual Attention via Selective Tuning , 1995, Artif. Intell..

[8]  S. Shioiri,et al.  Useful Resolution for Picture Perception as a Function of Eccentricity , 1989, Perception.

[9]  G. d'Ydewalle,et al.  Early peripheral and foveal processing in fixations during scene perception , 2003 .

[10]  N. Kampen,et al.  Stochastic processes in physics and chemistry , 1981 .

[11]  J. Schall,et al.  Neural Control of Voluntary Movement Initiation , 1996, Science.

[12]  A. Nuthmann How do the regions of the visual field contribute to object search in real-world scenes? Evidence from eye movements. , 2014, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[13]  Erik D. Reichle,et al.  Direct lexical control of eye movements in reading: Evidence from a survival analysis of fixation durations , 2012, Cognitive Psychology.

[14]  Lester C. Loschky,et al.  Investigating spatial vision and dynamic attentional selection using a gaze-contingent multiresolutional display. , 2002, Journal of experimental psychology. Applied.

[15]  R. Carpenter,et al.  The influence of urgency on decision time , 2000, Nature Neuroscience.

[16]  S. Sheather Density Estimation , 2004 .

[17]  Jeffrey S. Perry,et al.  Visual search: the role of peripheral information measured using gaze-contingent displays. , 2006, Journal of vision.

[18]  J. Henderson,et al.  CRISP: a computational model of fixation durations in scene viewing. , 2010, Psychological review.

[19]  Lester C. Loschky,et al.  The limits of visual resolution in natural scene viewing , 2005 .

[20]  Reinhold Kliegl,et al.  SWIFT: a dynamical model of saccade generation during reading. , 2005, Psychological review.

[21]  J. Findlay,et al.  Active Vision: The Psychology of Looking and Seeing , 2003 .

[22]  Christof Koch,et al.  A Model of Saliency-Based Visual Attention for Rapid Scene Analysis , 2009 .

[23]  D G Pelli,et al.  The VideoToolbox software for visual psychophysics: transforming numbers into movies. , 1997, Spatial vision.

[24]  John H. Holland,et al.  Adaptation in Natural and Artificial Systems: An Introductory Analysis with Applications to Biology, Control, and Artificial Intelligence , 1992 .

[25]  G. d'Ydewalle,et al.  Chronometry of Foveal Information Extraction During Scene Perception , 1995 .

[26]  Antonio Torralba,et al.  Contextual guidance of eye movements and attention in real-world scenes: the role of global features in object search. , 2006, Psychological review.

[27]  Reinhold Kliegl,et al.  Mathematical models of eye movements in reading: a possible role for autonomous saccades , 2001, Biological Cybernetics.

[28]  Philip L. Smith,et al.  Psychology and neurobiology of simple decisions , 2004, Trends in Neurosciences.

[29]  Morten H. Christiansen,et al.  A computational model , 2014 .

[30]  David E. Goldberg,et al.  Genetic Algorithms in Search Optimization and Machine Learning , 1988 .

[31]  P. Lennie,et al.  Spatial and temporal contrast sensitivities of neurones in lateral geniculate nucleus of macaque. , 1984, The Journal of physiology.

[32]  Alex D. Hwang,et al.  A model of top-down attentional control during visual search in complex scenes. , 2009, Journal of vision.

[33]  Ralf Engbert,et al.  Microsaccades uncover the orientation of covert attention , 2003, Vision Research.

[34]  Ralf Engbert,et al.  ICAT: a computational model for the adaptive control of fixation durations , 2014, Psychonomic bulletin & review.

[35]  S J Anderson,et al.  Peripheral spatial vision: limits imposed by optics, photoreceptors, and receptor pooling. , 1991, Journal of the Optical Society of America. A, Optics and image science.

[36]  Derrick J. Parkhurst,et al.  Modeling the role of salience in the allocation of overt visual attention , 2002, Vision Research.

[37]  R. Walker,et al.  A model of saccade generation based on parallel processing and competitive inhibition , 1999, Behavioral and Brain Sciences.

[38]  Denis G. Pelli,et al.  ECVP '07 Abstracts , 2007, Perception.

[39]  F. Vitu,et al.  A perceptual-economy account for the inverted-optimal viewing position effect. , 2007, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[40]  M. Goodale,et al.  Separate visual pathways for perception and action , 1992, Trends in Neurosciences.

[41]  Scott D. Brown,et al.  Quantile maximum likelihood estimation of response time distributions , 2002, Psychonomic bulletin & review.

[42]  C. Koch,et al.  A saliency-based search mechanism for overt and covert shifts of visual attention , 2000, Vision Research.

[43]  Erik D. Reichle,et al.  Toward a model of eye movement control in reading. , 1998, Psychological review.

[44]  K. Rayner The 35th Sir Frederick Bartlett Lecture: Eye movements and attention in reading, scene perception, and visual search , 2009, Quarterly journal of experimental psychology.

[45]  J. Henderson,et al.  How are eye fixation durations controlled during scene viewing? Further evidence from a scene onset delay paradigm , 2009 .

[46]  Bernhard Schölkopf,et al.  Center-surround patterns emerge as optimal predictors for human saccade targets. , 2009, Journal of vision.

[47]  Ralf Engbert,et al.  Eye movements in a sequential scanning task: evidence for distributed processing. , 2012, Journal of vision.

[48]  Ralf Engbert,et al.  Microsaccades are triggered by low retinal image slip. , 2006, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[49]  Jochen J. Steil,et al.  Where to Look Next? Combining Static and Dynamic Proto-objects in a TVA-based Model of Visual Attention , 2010, Cognitive Computation.

[50]  C. J. Erkelens,et al.  PII: S0042-6989(97)00287-3 , 2003 .

[51]  D. Gillespie A General Method for Numerically Simulating the Stochastic Time Evolution of Coupled Chemical Reactions , 1976 .

[52]  G. McConkie,et al.  The span of the effective stimulus during a fixation in reading , 1975 .

[53]  R Hilz,et al.  Functional organization of the peripheral retina: sensitivity to periodic stimuli. , 1974, Vision research.

[54]  C. Gardiner Handbook of Stochastic Methods , 1983 .

[55]  Tom Foulsham,et al.  Saccade control in natural images is shaped by the information visible at fixation: evidence from asymmetric gaze-contingent windows , 2011, Attention, perception & psychophysics.

[56]  J. Henderson Human gaze control during real-world scene perception , 2003, Trends in Cognitive Sciences.

[57]  Ali Borji,et al.  State-of-the-Art in Visual Attention Modeling , 2013, IEEE Transactions on Pattern Analysis and Machine Intelligence.

[58]  K Rayner,et al.  Reading without a fovea. , 1979, Science.

[59]  G. C. Higgins,et al.  Photographic granularity and graininess; some characteristics of the visual system of importance in the evaluation of graininess and granularity. , 1947, Journal of the Optical Society of America.