What is “Odd” in Posner's Location-cueing Paradigm? Neural Responses to Unexpected Location and Feature Changes Compared

Within the parietal cortex, the temporo-parietal junction (TPJ) and the intraparietal sulcus (IPS) seem to be involved in both spatial and nonspatial functions: Both areas are activated when misleading information is provided by invalid spatial cues in Posner's location-cueing paradigm, but also when infrequent deviant stimuli are presented within a series of standard events. In the present study, we used functional magnetic resonance imaging to investigate the distinct and shared brain responses to (i) invalidly cued targets requiring attentional reorienting, and (ii) to target stimuli deviating in color and orientation leading to an oddball-like distraction effect. Both unexpected location and feature changes were accompanied by a significant slowing of manual reaction times. Bilateral TPJ and right superior parietal lobe (SPL) activation was observed in response to invalidly as compared to validly cued targets. In contrast, the bilateral inferior occipito-temporal cortex, the left inferior parietal cortex, right frontal areas, and the cerebellum showed stronger activation in response to deviant than to standard targets. Common activations were observed in the right angular gyrus along the IPS and in the right inferior frontal gyrus. We conclude that the superior parietal and temporo-parietal activations observed here as well as previously in location-cueing paradigms do not merely reflect the detection and processing of unexpected stimuli. Furthermore, our data suggest that the right IPS and the inferior frontal gyrus are involved in attentional selection and distractor processing of both spatial and nonspatial features.

[1]  R. C. Oldfield The assessment and analysis of handedness: the Edinburgh inventory. , 1971, Neuropsychologia.

[2]  G. R. Fink,et al.  The temporal dynamics of the Müller-Lyer illusion. , 2010, Cerebral cortex.

[3]  T. A. Kelley,et al.  Cortical mechanisms for shifting and holding visuospatial attention. , 2008, Cerebral cortex.

[4]  Karl J. Friston,et al.  A critique of functional localisers , 2006, NeuroImage.

[5]  Pia Rotshtein,et al.  On-line attentional selection from competing stimuli in opposite visual fields: effects on human visual cortex and control processes. , 2006, Journal of neurophysiology.

[6]  Karl J. Friston,et al.  Combining Spatial Extent and Peak Intensity to Test for Activations in Functional Imaging , 1997, NeuroImage.

[7]  C. Kennard,et al.  The anatomy of visual neglect. , 2003, Brain : a journal of neurology.

[8]  Takashi J. Ozaki,et al.  Dissociable neural correlates of reorienting within versus across visual hemifields , 2009, Neuroreport.

[9]  R. Goebel,et al.  The functional neuroanatomy of target detection: an fMRI study of visual and auditory oddball tasks. , 1999, Cerebral cortex.

[10]  M. Posner,et al.  Orienting of Attention* , 1980, The Quarterly journal of experimental psychology.

[11]  J. Downar,et al.  A multimodal cortical network for the detection of changes in the sensory environment , 2000, Nature Neuroscience.

[12]  Gereon R. Fink,et al.  Cue validity modulates the neural correlates of covert endogenous orienting of attention in parietal and frontal cortex , 2006, NeuroImage.

[13]  R. Marois,et al.  Visual Short-Term Memory Load Suppresses Temporo-Parietal Junction Activity and Induces Inattentional Blindness , 2005, Psychological science.

[14]  Karl J. Friston,et al.  Conjunction revisited , 2005, NeuroImage.

[15]  G. R. Fink,et al.  Effects of nicotine on visuo-spatial selective attention as indexed by event-related potentials , 2006, Neuroscience.

[16]  G A Orban,et al.  Attentional responses to unattended stimuli in human parietal cortex. , 2005, Brain : a journal of neurology.

[17]  Rainer Goebel,et al.  Attentional systems in target and distractor processing: a combined ERP and fMRI study , 2004, NeuroImage.

[18]  Erich Schröger,et al.  Visual distraction: a behavioral and event-related brain potential study in humans , 2006, Neuroreport.

[19]  Karl J. Friston,et al.  Statistical parametric maps in functional imaging: A general linear approach , 1994 .

[20]  George R. Mangun,et al.  Right temporoparietal junction activation by a salient contextual cue facilitates target discrimination , 2011, NeuroImage.

[21]  Paul J. Laurienti,et al.  An automated method for neuroanatomic and cytoarchitectonic atlas-based interrogation of fMRI data sets , 2003, NeuroImage.

[22]  F. J. Friedrich,et al.  Spatial attention deficits in humans: a comparison of superior parietal and temporal-parietal junction lesions. , 1998, Neuropsychology.

[23]  R. C. Oldfield THE ASSESSMENT AND ANALYSIS OF HANDEDNESS , 1971 .

[24]  M. Corbetta,et al.  Control of goal-directed and stimulus-driven attention in the brain , 2002, Nature Reviews Neuroscience.

[25]  Erich Schröger,et al.  Distraction effects in vision: behavioral and event-related potential indices , 2004, Neuroreport.

[26]  Karl Velhagen,et al.  Tafeln zur Prüfung des Farbensinnes , 1985 .

[27]  J. Downar,et al.  The Effect of Task Relevance on the Cortical Response to Changes in Visual and Auditory Stimuli: An Event-Related fMRI Study , 2001, NeuroImage.

[28]  E. Halgren,et al.  Top-down facilitation of visual recognition. , 2006, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[29]  R. Benson,et al.  Responses to rare visual target and distractor stimuli using event-related fMRI. , 2000, Journal of neurophysiology.

[30]  D. Madden,et al.  Selective attention and visual search: revision of an allocation model and application to age differences. , 1992, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[31]  Parashkev Nachev,et al.  Space and the parietal cortex , 2007, Trends in Cognitive Sciences.

[32]  H. Abdi The General Linear Model , 2009 .

[33]  J. Marshall,et al.  Spatial cognition: evidence from visual neglect , 2003, Trends in Cognitive Sciences.

[34]  G. Mangun,et al.  The neural mechanisms of top-down attentional control , 2000, Nature Neuroscience.

[35]  Ralph Weidner,et al.  Dynamic Coding of Events within the Inferior Frontal Gyrus in a Probabilistic Selective Attention Task , 2011, Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience.

[36]  J. Gore,et al.  A Stimulus-Driven Approach to Object Identity and Location Processing in the Human Brain , 2000, Neuron.

[37]  D. Gitelman,et al.  Functional Specificity of Superior Parietal Mediation of Spatial Shifting , 2001, NeuroImage.

[38]  A. Aron,et al.  Theta burst stimulation dissociates attention and action updating in human inferior frontal cortex , 2010, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[39]  C. Frith,et al.  Differential Activation of Right Superior Parietal Cortex and Intraparietal Sulcus by Spatial and Nonspatial Attention , 1998, NeuroImage.

[40]  H J Müller,et al.  Top-down controlled visual dimension weighting: an event-related fMRI study. , 2002, Cerebral cortex.

[41]  M. Mesulam,et al.  Remapping attentional priorities: differential contribution of superior parietal lobule and intraparietal sulcus. , 2007, Cerebral cortex.

[42]  George R. Mangun,et al.  Anterior Intraparietal Sulcus is Sensitive to Bottom–Up Attention Driven by Stimulus Salience , 2009, Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience.

[43]  Vincent L. Gracco,et al.  On the selection of words and oral motor responses: Evidence of a response-independent fronto-parietal network , 2010, Cortex.

[44]  S. Yantis,et al.  Transient neural activity in human parietal cortex during spatial attention shifts , 2002, Nature Neuroscience.

[45]  M. Corbetta,et al.  Neural basis and recovery of spatial attention deficits in spatial neglect , 2005, Nature Neuroscience.

[46]  E. Miller,et al.  The prefontral cortex and cognitive control , 2000, Nature Reviews Neuroscience.

[47]  M. Corbetta,et al.  An Event-Related Functional Magnetic Resonance Imaging Study of Voluntary and Stimulus-Driven Orienting of Attention , 2005, The Journal of Neuroscience.

[48]  G. R. Fink,et al.  The modulatory effects of nicotine on parietal cortex activity in a cued target detection task depend on cue reliability , 2006, Neuroscience.

[49]  Stephen M. Rao,et al.  Neural Mechanisms of Visual Attention: Object-Based Selection of a Region in Space , 2000, Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience.

[50]  Gereon R Fink,et al.  Cerebral correlates of alerting, orienting and reorienting of visuospatial attention: an event-related fMRI study , 2004, NeuroImage.

[51]  P. Holcomb,et al.  Frontal and Parietal Components of a Cerebral Network Mediating Voluntary Attention to Novel Events , 2003, Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience.

[52]  E. Miller,et al.  THE PREFRONTAL CORTEX AND COGNITIVE CONTROL , 2000 .

[53]  Biyu J. He,et al.  Breakdown of Functional Connectivity in Frontoparietal Networks Underlies Behavioral Deficits in Spatial Neglect , 2007, Neuron.

[54]  M. Corbetta,et al.  Right TPJ deactivation during visual search: functional significance and support for a filter hypothesis. , 2007, Cerebral cortex.

[55]  O Josephs,et al.  Event-related functional magnetic resonance imaging: modelling, inference and optimization. , 1999, Philosophical transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Biological sciences.

[56]  M. Mesulam,et al.  The central role of the prefrontal cortex in directing attention to novel events. , 2000, Brain : a journal of neurology.