Trade-off between reciprocal mutualists: local resource availability-oriented interaction in fig/fig wasp mutualism.

1. The mechanisms that prevent competition (conflict) between the recipient and co-operative actor in co-operative systems remain one of the greatest problems for evolutionary biology. Previous hypotheses suggest that self-restraint, dispersal or spatial constraints can prevent direct competition for local resources or any other common resources, thereby maintaining stable co-operation interactions. In this study, we use the obligate fig-fig-wasp mutualism to examine whether the above mechanisms can maintain stable co-operation sufficiently between figs and fig wasps. 2. Our data on obligate co-operation between figs (Ficus racemosa Linn.) and fig wasps (Ceratoslen fusciceps Mayr) show that the number of viable seeds of figs is positively correlated with the number of pollinator offspring when the number of vacant female flowers is high while the foundress number is low (two foundresses). Meanwhile, they are negatively correlated when the number of vacant female flowers is low and the number of foundresses is increased manually (eight foundresses). The correlation coefficient between viable seeds and wasp offspring (galls) depends on vacant female flower availability. 3. Our data suggest that the interaction between figs and fig wasps is conditional, and that they co-operate when local resource availability is plentiful but are in conflict when local resource availability is limited. The self-restraint, dispersal and spatial heterogeneity previously hypothesized in maintaining stable co-operation cannot sufficiently prevent the symbionts from utilizing more local resources at the expense of the recipients. The conflict, which can disrupt the co-operation interaction, exists after the local resource is saturated with symbionts. The repression of symbiont increase, therefore repressing the utilization of local resources in the conflict period, is crucial in the maintenance and evolution of co-operation.

[1]  W. Hamilton.  The genetical evolution of social behaviour. I. , 1964, Journal of theoretical biology.

[2]  Stuart A. West,et al.  Sanctions and mutualism stability: when should less beneficial mutualists be tolerated? , 2002 .

[3]  Michael Doebeli,et al.  Spatial structure often inhibits the evolution of cooperation in the snowdrift game , 2004, Nature.

[4]  Seasonal changes in the trade-off among fig-supported wasps and viable seeds in figs and their evolutionary implications , 2005 .

[5]  T. Clutton‐Brock,et al.  Punishment in animal societies , 1995, Nature.

[6]  M. Doebeli,et al.  The evolution of interspecific mutualisms. , 1998, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[7]  U. Dieckmann,et al.  THE ADAPTIVE DYNAMICS OF ALTRUISM IN SPATIALLY HETEROGENEOUS POPULATIONS , 2003, Evolution; international journal of organic evolution.

[8]  George C. Williams,et al.  Adaptation and Natural Selection , 2018 .

[9]  S. West,et al.  Conflict of interest in a mutualism: documenting the elusive fig wasp–seed trade–off , 1997, Proceedings of the Royal Society of London. Series B: Biological Sciences.

[10]  Judith L Bronstein,et al.  Population Dynamics and Mutualism: Functional Responses of Benefits and Costs , 2002, The American Naturalist.

[11]  George R. Price,et al.  Selection and Covariance , 1970, Nature.

[12]  J. Bronstein.  Mutualism, Antagonism, and the Fig‐Pollinator Interaction , 1988 .

[13]  M. Anstett.  Unbeatable strategy, constraint and coevolution, or how to resolve evolutionary conflicts: the case of the fig/wasp mutualism , 2001 .

[14]  IS THERE DIMORPHISM FOR STYLE LENGTHS IN MONOECIOUS FIGS , 1995 .

[15]  J. Bronstein,et al.  Variation in reproductive success within a subtropical fig/pollinator mutualism , 1996 .

[16]  U. Mueller,et al.  The evolution of mutualisms: exploring the paths between conflict and cooperation. , 1999, Trends in ecology & evolution.

[17]  O. Pellmyr,et al.  POLLEN-MEDIATED SELECTIVE ABORTION IN YUCCAS AND ITS CONSEQUENCES FOR THE PLANT–POLLINATOR MUTUALISM , 2000 .

[18]  Steven A. Frank,et al.  Mutual policing and repression of competition in the evolution of cooperative groups , 1995, Nature.

[19]  G. B. Pollock,et al.  Can altruism evolve in purely viscous populations? , 1992, Evolutionary Ecology.

[20]  M. Anstett,et al.  Resource allocation: a conflict in the fig/fig wasp mutualism? , 1996 .

[21]  M. Hossaert-McKey,et al.  Why do fig wasps actively pollinate monoecious figs? , 2003, Oecologia.

[22]  P. Taylor,et al.  The evolution of dispersal in spatially varying environments , 2001 .

[23]  V. Hutson,et al.  The evolution of dispersal , 2003, Journal of mathematical biology.

[24]  S. Frank.  Genetics of mutualism: the evolution of altruism between species. , 1994, Journal of theoretical biology.

[25]  J. Bronstein,et al.  Waiting for wasps: consequences for the pollination dynamics of Ficus pertusa L. , 1996 .

[26]  Tim Clutton-Brock,et al.  Breeding together: kin selection and mutualism in cooperative vertebrates. , 2002, Science.

[27]  D. Queller,et al.  Does population viscosity promote kin selection? , 1992, Trends in ecology & evolution.

[28]  M A Nowak,et al.  Spatial games and the maintenance of cooperation. , 1994, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[29]  D. Queller,et al.  A GENERAL MODEL FOR KIN SELECTION , 1992, Evolution; international journal of organic evolution.

[30]  A. Griffin,et al.  Cooperation and Competition Between Relatives , 2002, Science.

[31]  J. Bronstein,et al.  Pollination mode in fig wasps: the predictive power of correlated traits , 2001, Proceedings of the Royal Society of London. Series B: Biological Sciences.

[32]  Wang Ruiwu,et al.  Structure of a fig wasp community: Temporal segregation of oviposition and larval diets , 2008 .

[33]  K. M. Sefc,et al.  Variable discrimination and asymmetric preferences in laboratory tests of reproductive isolation between cichlid colour morphs , 2010, Journal of evolutionary biology.

[34]  M. J. Hatcher,et al.  Foundress re‐emergence and fig permeability in fig tree–wasp mutualisms , 2003, Journal of evolutionary biology.

[35]  W. Hamilton,et al.  Selfish and Spiteful Behaviour in an Evolutionary Model , 1970, Nature.

[36]  Douglas W. Yu,et al.  Oviposition strategies, host coercion and the stable exploitation of figs by wasps , 2004, Proceedings of the Royal Society of London. Series B: Biological Sciences.

[37]  S. Frank,et al.  Policing and group cohesion when resources vary , 1996, Animal Behaviour.

[38]  W. Hamilton,et al.  Altruism and Related Phenomena, Mainly in Social Insects , 1972 .

[39]  J. Bronstein.  The Costs of Mutualism1 , 2001 .

[40]  S. Frank.  REPRESSION OF COMPETITION AND THE EVOLUTION OF COOPERATION , 2003 .

[41]  Jun-xing Yang,et al.  Fragmentation Effects on Diversity of Wasp Community and Its Impact on Fig/Fig Wasp Interaction in Ficus racemosa L. , 2005 .

[42]  M. Anstett,et al.  Figs and fig pollinators: evolutionary conflicts in a coevoled mutualism. , 1997, Trends in ecology & evolution.

[43]  W. Hamilton,et al.  The Evolution of Cooperation , 1984 .

[44]  J. Bronstein.  The Costs of Mutualism , 2001 .

[45]  S. West,et al.  The ecology of the New World fig-parasitizing wasps Idarnes and implications for the evolution of the fig–pollinator mutualism , 1994, Proceedings of the Royal Society of London. Series B: Biological Sciences.

[46]  J. Pepper,et al.  A Mechanism for the Evolution of Altruism among Nonkin: Positive Assortment through Environmental Feedback , 2002, The American Naturalist.

[47]  D. Wilson,et al.  Population viscosity and the evolution of altruism. , 2000, Journal of theoretical biology.

[48]  Leticia Avilés,et al.  Cooperation and non-linear dynamics: An ecological perspective on the evolution of sociality , 1999 .

[49]  P. Taylor.  Altruism in viscous populations — an inclusive fitness model , 1992, Evolutionary Ecology.

[50]  A. Griffin,et al.  Social semantics : altruism , cooperation , mutualism , strong reciprocity and group selection , 2007 .

[51]  R. Trivers.  The Evolution of Reciprocal Altruism , 1971, The Quarterly Review of Biology.

[52]  R. Uma Shaanker,et al.  Evolution of style-length variability in figs and optimization of ovipositor length in their pollinator wasps: A coevolutionary model , 1995, Journal of Genetics.

[53]  S. Compton,et al.  Regulation of seed and pollinator production in the fig-fig wasp mutualism , 1996 .

[54]  O. Pellmyr,et al.  Evolutionary stability of mutualism between yuccas and yucca moths , 1994, Nature.

[55]  M. Anstett,et al.  When figs wait for pollinators: the length of fig receptivity , 1995 .