Visual field defects in monocularly and binocularly deprived cats.

Abstract (1) A perimetry test was used to measure the visual responsiveness of discrete regions in the visual field of 2 normal, 4 monocularly deprived (MD) and 2 binocularly deprived (BD) cats. One of the MD cats as an adult underwent a reverse suture operation which forced it to use its formerly deprived eye for a 9 month period. Except for this MD cat which was tested only with its formerly deprived eye, each cat was tested binocularly and monocularly with each eye. (2) In agreement with previous results, normal cats responded binocularly to objects presented anywhere in the region bounded approximately from 100° right-lateral to 100° left-lateral. The monocular visual fields were measured to be approximately from 100° ipsilateral (to the open eye) to 45° contralateral. Thus the binocular segment of visual field includes the region bounded bilaterally by about 45°, and the monocular segment of each side is bounded approximately between 45° and 100°. (3) Each of the 3 MD cats tested with both eyes showed a normal monocular visual field for the non-deprived eye. Each with the deprived eye, however, ignored objects presented in the binocular segment yet, after a period following eye-opening, responded fairly normally to objects presented in the monocular segment. Binocularly, the visual fields of these cats appeared fairly normal. This response pattern was evident during the first testing after opening of the deprived eye although the responses with this eye improved considerably in the ensuing days. (4) The MD cat with reverse suture had a monocular visual field for its formerly deprived eye which closely matched the deprived eye fields of the other 3 MD cats. The reverse suture procedure resulted in no qualitative improvement for the formerly deprived eye. (5) Each BD cat had a fairly normal binocular visual field. When tested monocularly, however, they consistently ignored stimuli presented in the hemifield contralateral to the open eye. Unlike the MD cats, no visual responses were seen in the BD cats for several days after eye-opening. (6) The behavior of MD cats is suggested to be related to physiological deficits which are limited to the binocular segment of the geniculostriate system, and perhaps also to this segment of the superior colliculus. It is further suggested that the behavior of BD cats results from a cortex which is non-functional for visually guided behavior and a superior colliculus which controls this behavior but which receives functional visual afferents almost exclusively from the contraleteral retina.

[1]  D. Hubel,et al.  Receptive fields, binocular interaction and functional architecture in the cat's visual cortex , 1962, The Journal of physiology.

[2]  P. Sterling,et al.  Function of the projection from the visual cortex to the superior colliculus. , 1970, Brain, behavior and evolution.

[3]  B. L. Baxter Effect of visual deprivation during postnatal maturation on the electroencephalogram of the cat. , 1966, Experimental neurology.

[4]  D. Hubel,et al.  Comparison of the effects of unilateral and bilateral eye closure on cortical unit responses in kittens. , 1965, Journal of neurophysiology.

[5]  D. Hubel,et al.  Extent of recovery from the effects of visual deprivation in kittens. , 1965, Journal of neurophysiology.

[6]  D. L. Stewart,et al.  Reversal of structural and functional effects of long-term visual deprivation in cats. , 1972, Experimental neurology.

[7]  R W Guillery,et al.  The differential effects of unilateral lid closure upon the monocular and binocular segments of the dorsal lateral geniculate nucleus in the cat , 1970, The Journal of comparative neurology.

[8]  J. Stone,et al.  Relay of receptive-field properties in dorsal lateral geniculate nucleus of the cat. , 1972, Journal of neurophysiology.

[9]  P. Sterling,et al.  Effect on the Superior Colliculus of Cortical Removal in Visually Deprived Cats , 1969, Nature.

[10]  D. Hubel,et al.  EFFECTS OF VISUAL DEPRIVATION ON MORPHOLOGY AND PHYSIOLOGY OF CELLS IN THE CATS LATERAL GENICULATE BODY. , 1963, Journal of neurophysiology.

[11]  S. Sherman,et al.  Binocular interaction on cells of the dorsal lateral geniculate nucleus of visually deprived cats. , 1972, Brain research.

[12]  D. Hubel,et al.  SINGLE-CELL RESPONSES IN STRIATE CORTEX OF KITTENS DEPRIVED OF VISION IN ONE EYE. , 1963, Journal of neurophysiology.

[13]  D. Hubel,et al.  The period of susceptibility to the physiological effects of unilateral eye closure in kittens , 1970, The Journal of physiology.

[14]  W. Levick,et al.  The determination of the projection of the visual field on to the lateral geniculate nucleus in the cat , 1962, The Journal of physiology.

[15]  G. Rizzolatti,et al.  Pattern discrimination in monocularly reared cats. , 1971, Experimental neurology.

[16]  K. Sanderson,et al.  The projection of the visual field to the lateral geniculate and medial interlaminar nuclei in the cat , 1971, The Journal of comparative neurology.

[17]  P. O. Bishop,et al.  RESPONSES OF SINGLE UNITS IN LATERAL GENICULATE NUCLEUS OF CAT TO MOVING VISUAL PATTERNS. , 1965, Journal of neurophysiology.

[18]  S. Sherman Visual development in cats. , 1972, Investigative ophthalmology.

[19]  T. Wiesel,et al.  Consequences of monocular deprivation on visual behaviour in kittens , 1970, The Journal of physiology.

[20]  P. O. Bishop,et al.  Some quantitative aspects of the cat's eye: axis and plane of reference, visual field co‐ordinates and optics , 1962, The Journal of physiology.

[21]  J. Stone,et al.  Loss of a specific cell type from dorsal lateral geniculate nucleus in visually deprived cats. , 1972, Journal of neurophysiology.

[22]  S. Sherman Development of interocular alignment in cats. , 1972, Brain research.

[23]  J. Sprague,et al.  Interaction of Cortex and Superior Colliculus in Mediation of Visually Guided Behavior in the Cat , 1966, Science.

[24]  T H MEIKLE,et al.  THE ROLE OF THE SUPERIOR COLLICULUS IN VISUALLY GUIDED BEHAVIOR. , 1965, Experimental neurology.

[25]  L Ganz,et al.  The effect of visual deprivation on perceptual behavior. , 1968, Experimental neurology.

[26]  A. Riesen,et al.  Interocular transfer of visual intensity discrimination after ablation of striate cortex in dark-reared kittens. , 1963 .

[27]  L. Ganz,et al.  The selective effect of visual deprivation on receptive field shape determined neurophysiologically. , 1968, Experimental neurology.

[28]  P Sterling,et al.  Visual receptive fields in the superior colliculus of the cat. , 1969, Journal of neurophysiology.

[29]  P Sterling,et al.  Influence of visual cortex on receptive fields in the superior colliculus of the cat. , 1969, Journal of neurophysiology.