A new pre-processing approach against array uncertainty for GNSS

Adaptive antenna processing has been widely applied to GNSS interference mitigation. Nevertheless, a great variety of uncertainties exist in array signal processing, such as array gain, phase, antenna location and mutual coupling, etc. These uncertainties in array system are what concern designers in optimizing their algorithms. The proposed approach is presented as a solution by appending an adaptive filter and employing a mixed least mean squares (LMS)/ Hinfin-optimal algorithm as a pre-processor to the beamformer. The simulation results demonstrate that the algorithm can offer improved capabilities for anti-jamming, isolate dispersed interferences as well as jammers and eliminate system uncertainties.

[1]  Zhi Tian,et al.  A recursive least squares implementation for LCMP beamforming under quadratic constraint , 2001, IEEE Trans. Signal Process..

[2]  Barry D. Van Veen Minimum variance beamforming with soft response constraints , 1991, IEEE Trans. Signal Process..

[3]  Chung-Liang Chang,et al.  Performance analysis of GPS pseudolite interference mitigation using adaptive spatial beamforming , 2005 .

[4]  D. Bernstein,et al.  LQG control with an H/sup infinity / performance bound: a Riccati equation approach , 1989 .

[5]  Yehuda Leviatan,et al.  Cancellation performance degradation of a fully adaptive Yagi array due to inner-element coupling , 1983 .

[6]  A. Manikas,et al.  An H/sup /spl infin// approach to mitigate the effects of array uncertainties on the MUSIC algorithm , 1998, IEEE Signal Processing Letters.

[7]  A. Elnashar,et al.  Further Study on Robust Adaptive Beamforming With Optimum Diagonal Loading , 2006, IEEE Transactions on Antennas and Propagation.

[8]  Ali H. Sayed,et al.  H∞ optimality of the LMS algorithm , 1996, IEEE Trans. Signal Process..

[9]  W. Haddad,et al.  LQG control with an H∞ performance bound: a riccati equation approach , 1988, 1988 American Control Conference.

[10]  A. Lee Swindlehurst,et al.  The effects of array calibration errors on DF-based signal copy performance , 1995, IEEE Trans. Signal Process..

[11]  Jian Li,et al.  On robust Capon beamforming and diagonal loading , 2003, 2003 IEEE International Conference on Acoustics, Speech, and Signal Processing, 2003. Proceedings. (ICASSP '03)..

[12]  K. Glover,et al.  Mixed H-2 and H-infinity performance objectives II: optimal control , 1994 .

[13]  E. Friel,et al.  Mutual coupling effects and their reduction in wideband direction of arrival estimation , 1994 .

[14]  Constantine A. Balanis,et al.  Antenna Theory: Analysis and Design , 1982 .

[15]  A.B. Gershman,et al.  Robust adaptive beamforming using worst-case performance optimization , 2003, The Thrity-Seventh Asilomar Conference on Signals, Systems & Computers, 2003.

[16]  Antonio Cantoni,et al.  An alternative formulation for an optimum beamformer with robustness capability , 1985 .

[17]  Zhi-Quan Luo,et al.  Robust adaptive beamforming using worst-case performance optimization: a solution to the signal mismatch problem , 2003, IEEE Trans. Signal Process..

[18]  Kemin Zhou,et al.  Mixed /spl Hscr//sub 2/ and /spl Hscr//sub /spl infin// performance objectives. I. Robust performance analysis , 1994 .

[19]  Babak Hassibi,et al.  Mixed least-mean-squares/H/spl infin/-optimal adaptive filtering , 1996, Conference Record of The Thirtieth Asilomar Conference on Signals, Systems and Computers.

[20]  Krishna M. Pasala,et al.  Effects of mutual coupling on the performance of STAP antenna arrays , 2000, IEEE Trans. Aerosp. Electron. Syst..

[21]  B. Carlson Covariance matrix estimation errors and diagonal loading in adaptive arrays , 1988 .

[22]  I. Gupta,et al.  Effect of mutual coupling on the performance of adaptive arrays , 1983 .