Optimal Remote Estimation Over Use-Dependent Packet-Drop Channels - Extended Version

Abstract: Consider a discrete-time remote estimation system formed by an encoder, a transmission policy, a channel, and a remote estimator. The encoder assesses a random process that the remote estimator seeks to estimate based on information sent to it by the encoder via the channel. The channel is affected by Bernoulli drops. The instantaneous probability of a drop is governed by a finite state machine (FSM). The state of the FSM is denoted as the channel state. At each time step, the encoder decides whether to attempt a transmission through the packet-drop link. The sequence of transmission decisions is the input to the FSM. This paper seeks to design an encoder, transmission policy and remote estimator that minimize a finite-horizon mean squared error cost. We present two structural results. The first result in which we assume that the process to be estimated is white and Gaussian, we show that there is an optimal transmission policy governed by a threshold on the estimation error. The second result characterizes optimal symmetric transmission policies for the case when the measured process is the state of a scalar linear time-invariant plant driven by white Gaussian noise. Use-dependent packet-drop channels can be used to quantify the effect of transmission on channel quality when the channel is powered by energy harvesting. In the expanded version of this paper, an additional application to a mixed initiative system in which a human operator performs visual search tasks is presented.

[1]  Michael Athans,et al.  1972 IFAC congress paper: On the determination of optimal costly measurement strategies for linear stochastic systems , 1972 .

[2]  Bruce E. Hajek,et al.  Paging and Registration in Cellular Networks: Jointly Optimal Policies and an Iterative Algorithm , 2007, IEEE Transactions on Information Theory.

[3]  Axel Schulte,et al.  Measuring Self-adaptive UAV Operators' Load-Shedding Strategies under High Workload , 2011, HCI.

[4]  Marcos M. Vasconcelos,et al.  Estimation over the collision channel: Structural results , 2013, 2013 51st Annual Allerton Conference on Communication, Control, and Computing (Allerton).

[5]  M. Athans On the Determination of Optimal Costly Measurement Strategies for Linear Stochastic Systems , 1972 .

[6]  Kaibin Huang,et al.  Energy Harvesting Wireless Communications: A Review of Recent Advances , 2015, IEEE Journal on Selected Areas in Communications.

[7]  Nuno C. Martins,et al.  Optimal state estimation in the presence of communication costs and packet drops , 2009, 2009 47th Annual Allerton Conference on Communication, Control, and Computing (Allerton).

[8]  R. Yerkes,et al.  The relation of strength of stimulus to rapidity of habit‐formation , 1908 .

[9]  Vaibhav Srivastava,et al.  Adaptive attention allocation in human-robot systems , 2012, 2012 American Control Conference (ACC).

[10]  Haris Vikalo,et al.  Greedy sensor selection: Leveraging submodularity , 2010, 49th IEEE Conference on Decision and Control (CDC).

[11]  Nuno C. Martins,et al.  Remote State Estimation With Communication Costs for First-Order LTI Systems , 2011, IEEE Transactions on Automatic Control.

[12]  Jing Yang,et al.  Optimal scheduling over fading broadcast channels with an energy harvesting transmitter , 2011, 2011 4th IEEE International Workshop on Computational Advances in Multi-Sensor Adaptive Processing (CAMSAP).

[13]  Emilio Frazzoli,et al.  A Dynamical Queue Approach to Intelligent Task Management for Human Operators , 2012, Proceedings of the IEEE.

[14]  Tsachy Weissman,et al.  Capacity of Channels With Action-Dependent States , 2009, IEEE Transactions on Information Theory.

[15]  Tamer Basar,et al.  Optimal Strategies for Communication and Remote Estimation With an Energy Harvesting Sensor , 2012, IEEE Transactions on Automatic Control.

[16]  Bruno Sinopoli,et al.  Kalman filtering with intermittent observations , 2004, IEEE Transactions on Automatic Control.