Data-Centricity and Services Interoperation

This position paper highlights three core areas in which persistent data will be crucial to the management of interoperating services, and highlights selected research and challenges in the area. Incorporating the data-centric perspective holds the promise of providing formal foundations for service interoperation that address issues such as providing a syntax-independent meta-model and semantics, and enabling faithful modeling of parallel interactions between multiple parties.

[1]  Serge Abiteboul,et al.  The Active XML project: an overview , 2008, The VLDB Journal.

[2]  Richard Hull,et al.  A Generic Business Artifacts Based Authorization Framework for Cross-Enterprise Collaboration , 2012, 2012 Annual SRII Global Conference.

[3]  J. Euzenat,et al.  Ontology Matching , 2007, Springer Berlin Heidelberg.

[4]  Richard Hull,et al.  Data Centric BPM and the Emerging Case Management Standard: A Short Survey , 2012, Business Process Management Workshops.

[5]  Adam Souzis,et al.  Semantic Annotations For Wsdl And Xml Schema , 2015 .

[6]  Marlon Dumas,et al.  Standards for Web Service Choreography and Orchestration: Status and Perspectives , 2005, Business Process Management Workshops.

[7]  Olaronke Iroju,et al.  Ontology Matching: An Ultimate Solution for Semantic Interoperability in Healthcare , 2012 .

[8]  Richard Hull,et al.  Supporting Collaborative Decision Processes , 2013, 2013 IEEE International Conference on Services Computing.

[9]  Santhosh Kumaran,et al.  ADoc-oriented programming , 2003, 2003 Symposium on Applications and the Internet, 2003. Proceedings..

[10]  DoanAnHai,et al.  Semantic-integration research in the database community , 2005 .

[11]  Wei Xu,et al.  Declarative Choreographies for Artifacts , 2012, ICSOC.

[12]  Anil Nigam,et al.  Business artifacts: An approach to operational specification , 2003, IBM Syst. J..

[13]  John Vergo,et al.  Artifact-Based Transformation of IBM Global Financing , 2009, BPM.

[14]  Ashwin Machanavajjhala,et al.  Entity Resolution: Theory, Practice & Open Challenges , 2012, Proc. VLDB Endow..

[15]  Chien-Sing Lee,et al.  Ontology Mapping and Merging through OntoDNA for Learning Object Reusability , 2006, J. Educ. Technol. Soc..

[16]  Morris A. Swertz,et al.  OntoCAT -- simple ontology search and integration in Java, R and REST/JavaScript , 2011, BMC Bioinformatics.

[17]  Diego Calvanese,et al.  Verification of relational data-centric dynamic systems with external services , 2012, PODS.

[18]  Jay K. Strosnider,et al.  Model-driven synthesis of SOA solutions , 2008, IBM Syst. J..

[19]  Richard Hull,et al.  On the equivalence of incremental and fixpoint semantics for business artifacts with Guard-Stage-Milestone lifecycles , 2013, Inf. Syst..

[20]  Wil M. P. van der Aalst,et al.  DECLARE: Full Support for Loosely-Structured Processes , 2007, 11th IEEE International Enterprise Distributed Object Computing Conference (EDOC 2007).

[21]  Richard Hull,et al.  Business artifacts with guard-stage-milestone lifecycles: managing artifact interactions with conditions and events , 2011, DEBS '11.

[22]  Guido Governatori,et al.  Compliance aware business process design , 2008 .

[23]  Ralf Steinmetz,et al.  Adaptive matchmaking for RESTful services based on hRESTS and MicroWSMO , 2010, WEWST '10.

[24]  Richard Hull,et al.  Introducing the Guard-Stage-Milestone Approach for Specifying Business Entity Lifecycles , 2010, WS-FM.

[25]  Santhosh Kumaran,et al.  A model-driven approach to industrializing discovery processes in pharmaceutical research , 2005, IBM Syst. J..

[26]  Frederick Y. Wu,et al.  Business Artifact-Centric Modeling for Real-Time Performance Monitoring , 2011, BPM.

[27]  Alessio Lomuscio,et al.  Verification of Agent-Based Artifact Systems , 2013, J. Artif. Intell. Res..

[28]  Richard Hull,et al.  Facilitating Workflow Interoperation Using Artifact-Centric Hubs , 2009, ICSOC/ServiceWave.