Multi-robot Spot-welding Cell Design: Problem Formalization and Proposed Architecture☆

Abstract The multi-robot cell design for car-body spot welding is faced by industry as a sequence of tasks, where researches are focused on issues of the problem as a whole. In authors’ knowledge, none work in literature have suggested any formalization for the complete process. This paper tries to bridges the gap proposing coherent process formalization, and presenting a corresponding innovative architecture for the automatic optimal cell design. Specifically, the formalization involves the identification and allocation of the resources in terms of a set of decisional variables (e.g. robot model/positioning/number, welding gun models/allocation/number, welding point allocation etc.); then, the design optimization process minimizes the investment costs granting the cycle time. The multi-loop optimization architecture integrates both new algorithms and existent procedures from different fields. Test-bed showing its feasibility is reported.

[1]  Sotiris Makris,et al.  Industrial applications with cooperating robots for the flexible assembly , 2011, Int. J. Comput. Integr. Manuf..

[2]  M Sarkans,et al.  Implementation of robot welding cells using modular approach , 2010 .

[3]  Tolio. Tullio,et al.  Design of Flexible Production Systems , 2009 .

[4]  Tullio Tolio,et al.  Integrated Approach for Multi-Robot Spot-Welding Cell Design and Welding-Point Allocation , 2013 .

[5]  H. Nakamura,et al.  Development of off-line programming system for spot welding robot , 1993, Proceedings of IEEE 2nd International Workshop on Emerging Technologies and Factory Automation (ETFA '93).

[6]  V. P. Agrawal,et al.  Computer aided robot selection: the ‘multiple attribute decision making’ approach , 1991 .

[7]  Sotiris Makris,et al.  An intelligent search algorithm-based method to derive assembly line design alternatives , 2012, Int. J. Comput. Integr. Manuf..

[8]  R. Venkata Rao,et al.  Industrial robot selection using a novel decision making method considering objective and subjective preferences , 2011, Robotics Auton. Syst..

[9]  Edsger W. Dijkstra,et al.  A Discipline of Programming , 1976 .

[10]  Waguih ElMaraghy,et al.  Design of reconfigurable automotive framing system , 2013 .

[11]  Lydia E. Kavraki,et al.  Probabilistic roadmaps for path planning in high-dimensional configuration spaces , 1996, IEEE Trans. Robotics Autom..

[12]  Mark H. Overmars,et al.  A Comparative Study of Probabilistic Roadmap Planners , 2002, WAFR.

[13]  Nikolaos Papakostas,et al.  Integrating digital manufacturing and simulation tools in the assembly design process: A cooperating robots cell case , 2011 .

[14]  Rishi Kumar,et al.  Optimal selection of robots by using distance based approach method , 2010 .

[15]  Jean-Claude Latombe,et al.  Robot motion planning , 1970, The Kluwer international series in engineering and computer science.