Getting Off on the Wrong Foot: The Timing of a Breach and the Restoration of Trust

Few interpersonal relationships endure without one party violating the other's expectations. Thus, the ability to build trust and to restore cooperation after a breach can be critical for the preservation of positive relationships. Using an iterated prisoner's dilemma, this article presents two experiments that investigated the effects of the timing of a trust breach—at the start of an interaction, after 5 trials, after 10 trials, or not at all. The findings indicate that getting off on the wrong foot has devastating long-term consequences. Although later breaches seemed to limit cooperation for only a short time, they still planted a seed of distrust that surfaced in the end.

[1]  N. Ambady,et al.  Half a minute: Predicting teacher evaluations from thin slices of nonverbal behavior and physical attractiveness. , 1993 .

[2]  A. Rapoport,et al.  Prisoner's Dilemma: A Study in Conflict and Co-operation , 1970 .

[3]  R. Fisher,et al.  Getting Together: Building Relationships As We Negotiate , 1988 .

[4]  Wyer,et al.  Prediction of behavior in two-person games , 1969 .

[5]  J. Ivancevich.  Contrast Effects in Performance Evaluation and Reward Practices , 1983 .

[6]  J. K. Murnighan,et al.  The Emergence of Norms in Competitive Decision-Making Groups. , 1985 .

[7]  Donal E. Carlston,et al.  Negativity and extremity biases in impression formation: A review of explanations. , 1989 .

[8]  S. Komorita,et al.  Betrayal and reconciliation in a two-person game. , 1967, Journal of personality and social psychology.

[9]  C. I. Hovland,et al.  Social Judgment: Assimilation and Contrast Effects in Communication and Attitude Change , 1981 .

[10]  P. Knight,et al.  Assimilation and contrast effects in performance ratings: Effects of rating the previous performance on rating subsequent performance. , 1996 .

[11]  A. Rubinstein.  Perfect Equilibrium in a Bargaining Model , 1982 .

[12]  D. Kipnis,et al.  Untangling the performance appraisal dilemma: The influence of perceived organizational context on evaluative processes. , 1976 .

[13]  J. G. Holmes.  Trust and the appraisal process in close relationships. , 1991 .

[14]  J. G. Holmes,et al.  Trust in close relationships. , 1985 .

[15]  N. Anderson,et al.  Primacy effects in personality impression formation. , 1961, Journal of abnormal and social psychology.

[16]  D. Byrne.  The Attraction Paradigm , 1971 .

[17]  H. Marsh,et al.  Longitudinal multilevel models of the big-fish-little-pond effect on academic self-concept: counterbalancing contrast and reflected-glory effects in Hong Kong schools. , 2000, Journal of personality and social psychology.

[18]  R. Brandis.  The Limits of Organization , 1975 .

[19]  J. Keith Murnighan,et al.  Defectors, Vulnerability, and Relative Power: Some Causes and Effects of Leaving a Stable Coalition , 1981 .

[20]  H. Kelley,et al.  Social interaction basis of cooperators' and competitors' beliefs about others. , 1970 .

[21]  H P RECKORT,et al.  [SOCIAL JUSTICE]. , 1965, Zahnarztliche Mitteilungen.

[22]  The Role of Expectancies in Accepting Task-Related Diversity: Do Disappointment and Lack of Commitment Stem From Actual Differences or Violated Expectations? , 2007, Personality & social psychology bulletin.

[23]  Judee K. Burgoon,et al.  Effects of preinteraction expectancies and target communication on perceiver reciprocity and compensation in dyadic interaction , 1995 .

[24]  John K Murnighan,et al.  Game theory and organizational behavior , 1994 .

[25]  D. Ferrin,et al.  Removing the shadow of suspicion: the effects of apology versus denial for repairing competence- versus integrity-based trust violations. , 2004, The Journal of applied psychology.

[26]  M. Deutsch.  The Resolution of ConflictConstructive and Destructive Processes , 1974 .

[27]  Joyce E. Berg,et al.  Trust, Reciprocity, and Social History , 1995 .

[28]  Deepak Malhotra,et al.  Attributions of trust and the calculus of reciprocity , 2003 .

[29]  T. Yamagishi,et al.  Separating Trust from Cooperation in a Dynamic Relationship , 2005 .

[30]  E. E. Jones,et al.  Primacy and assimilation in the attribution process: The stable entity proposition1 , 1972 .

[31]  Timothy R. Levine,et al.  When lies are uncovered: Emotional and relational outcomes of discovered deception , 1990 .

[32]  Larry L. Cummings,et al.  Causal Accounts and Managing Organizational Conflict , 1988 .

[33]  D. A. Kenny,et al.  The moderator-mediator variable distinction in social psychological research: conceptual, strategic, and statistical considerations. , 1986, Journal of personality and social psychology.

[34]  Roderick M. Kramer,et al.  Collective trust and collective action: The decision to trust as a social decision. , 1996 .

[35]  Brian R. Dineen,et al.  The Road to Reconciliation: Antecedents of Victim Willingness to Reconcile Following a Broken Promise , 2004 .

[36]  Colin Camerer.  Behavioral Game Theory: Experiments in Strategic Interaction , 2003 .

[37]  Denise M. Rousseau,et al.  The contracts of individuals and organizations , 1993 .

[38]  R. Lewicki,et al.  Trust And Distrust: New Relationships and Realities , 1998 .

[39]  R. Kramer,et al.  Trust in Organizations: Frontiers of Theory and Research , 1995 .

[40]  Melvin J. Kimmel,et al.  Twenty Years of Experimental Gaming: Critique,Synthesis, and Suggestions for the Future , 1977 .

[41]  Colin Camerer,et al.  Not So Different After All: A Cross-Discipline View Of Trust , 1998 .

[42]  P. Blau.  Exchange and Power in Social Life , 1964 .

[43]  Deepak Malhotra,et al.  NORMAL ACTS OF IRRATIONAL TRUST: MOTIVATED ATTRIBUTIONS AND THE TRUST DEVELOPMENT PROCESS , 2004 .

[44]  Eric T. Bradlow,et al.  Promises and Lies: Restoring Violated Trust , 2004 .

[45]  R. Rosenthal.  Meta-analytic procedures for social research , 1984 .

[46]  H. Kelley.  Personal Relationships: Their Structures and Processes , 1979 .

[47]  J. Gibson.  The Contributions of Truth to Reconciliation , 2006 .

[48]  S. Asch.  Forming impressions of personality. , 1946, Journal of Abnormal Psychology.

[49]  John Keith Murnighan,et al.  The Dynamics of Bargaining Games , 1991 .

[50]  H. Marsh,et al.  Longitudinal multilevel models of the big-fish-little-pond effect on academic self-concept: counterbalancing contrast and reflected-glory effects in Hong Kong schools. , 2000, Journal of personality and social psychology.

[51]  R. Lewicki,et al.  Developing and Maintaining Trust in Work Relationships , 1996 .

[52]  Steven E. Daniels,et al.  When Talk Is Not Cheap: Substantive Penance and Expressions of Intent in Rebuilding Cooperation , 2002, Organ. Sci..

[53]  R. Solomon,et al.  Building Trust: In Business, Politics, Relationships, and Life , 2001 .

[54]  M. Deutsch.  Trust and suspicion , 1958 .

[55]  T. Yamagishi,et al.  Trust and commitment in the United States and Japan , 1994 .

[56]  S. Quartz,et al.  Getting to Know You: Reputation and Trust in a Two-Person Economic Exchange , 2005, Science.

[57]  K. Aquino,et al.  The Effects of Blame Attributions and Offender Likableness on Forgiveness and Revenge in the Workplace , 1999 .

[58]  R. Trivers.  The Evolution of Reciprocal Altruism , 1971, The Quarterly Review of Biology.

[59]  N. L. Chervany,et al.  Initial Trust Formation in New Organizational Relationships , 1998 .

[60]  Naomi Ellemers,et al.  What Can You Expect? The Influence of Gender Diversity in Dyads on Work Goal Expectancies and Subsequent Work Commitment , 2006 .

[61]  T. Tyler,et al.  The Social Psychology of Procedural Justice , 1988 .