Diversity-Induced Resonance in the Response to Social Norms

In this paper we focus on diversity-induced resonance, which was recently found in bistable, excitable, and other physical systems. We study the appearance of this phenomenon in a purely economic model of cooperating and defecting agents. An agent's contribution to a public good is seen as a social norm, so defecting agents face a social pressure, which decreases if free riding becomes widespread. In this model, diversity among agents naturally appears because of the different sensitivities towards the social norm. We study the evolution of cooperation as a response to the social norm (i) for the replicator dynamics and (ii) for the logit dynamics by means of numerical simulations. Diversity-induced resonance is observed as a maximum in the response of agents to changes in the social norm as a function of the degree of heterogeneity in the population. We provide an analytical, mean-field approach for the logit dynamics and find very good agreement with the simulations. From a socioeconomic perspective, our results show that, counterintuitively, diversity in the individual sensitivity to social norms may result in a society that better follows such norms as a whole, even if part of the population is less prone to follow them.

[1]  W. Hamilton,et al.  The Evolution of Cooperation , 1984 .

[2]  Lucas Lacasa,et al.  Critical behavior of a Ginzburg–Landau model with additive quenched noise , 2010, 1009.4631.

[3]  Bruno S. Frey,et al.  Economics and psychology : a promising new cross-disciplinary field , 2010 .

[4]  Raúl Toral,et al.  Diversity-induced resonance. , 2006, Physical review letters.

[5]  Karl Sigmund.  The Economics of Fairness , 2002 .

[6]  Didier Sornette,et al.  Noise-induced volatility of collective dynamics. , 2010, Physical review. E, Statistical, nonlinear, and soft matter physics.

[7]  J. Kagel,et al.  Handbook of Experimental Economics , 1997 .

[8]  S. Galam.  Contrarian deterministic effects on opinion dynamics: “the hung elections scenario” , 2003, cond-mat/0307404.

[9]  Xiaoqin Luo,et al.  Diversity-induced resonance with two different kinds of time delays , 2011 .

[10]  Claudio J. Tessone,et al.  Collective effects induced by diversity in extended systems , 2007 .

[11]  Mark D. McDonnell,et al.  The benefits of noise in neural systems: bridging theory and experiment , 2011, Nature Reviews Neuroscience.

[12]  Frank Schweitzer,et al.  An agent-based model of collective emotions in online communities , 2010, ArXiv.

[13]  Z. Duan,et al.  SPATIAL COHERENCE RESONANCE IN DELAYED HODGKIN-HUXLEY NEURONAL NETWORKS , 2010 .

[14]  C. Keser,et al.  Conditional cooperation and voluntary contributions to public goods , 2000 .

[15]  José Manuel Galán,et al.  Appearances Can Be Deceiving: Lessons Learned Re-Implementing Axelrod's 'Evolutionary Approach to Norms' , 2005, J. Artif. Soc. Soc. Simul..

[16]  Mark S. Granovetter.  Threshold Models of Collective Behavior , 1978, American Journal of Sociology.

[17]  Katherine A. Cronin,et al.  SOCIAL DYNAMICS AND COOPERATION: THE CASE OF NONHUMAN PRIMATES AND ITS IMPLICATIONS FOR HUMAN BEHAVIOR , 2012 .

[18]  Dirk Helbing.  Interrelations between stochastic equations for systems with pair interactions , 1992 .

[19]  Dietrich Stauffer,et al.  Simulation of Galam's contrarian opinions on percolative lattices , 2004 .

[20]  U. Fischbacher,et al.  Are People Conditionally Cooperative? Evidence from a Public Goods Experiment , 2001 .

[21]  Zhonghuai Hou,et al.  Threshold-diversity-induced resonance , 2009 .

[22]  Claudio J. Tessone,et al.  Global firing induced by network disorder in ensembles of active rotators , 2007, 0710.3311.

[23]  Alex Arenas,et al.  The joker effect: cooperation driven by destructive agents. , 2011, Journal of theoretical biology.

[24]  Antonio Cabrales,et al.  Three is a crowd in iterated prisoner's dilemmas: experimental evidence on reciprocal behavior , 2012, Scientific Reports.

[25]  S. Fortunato,et al.  Statistical physics of social dynamics , 2007, 0710.3256.

[26]  Nick Netzer,et al.  The logit-response dynamics , 2010, Games Econ. Behav..

[27]  Josef Hofbauer,et al.  Evolutionary Games and Population Dynamics , 1998 .

[28]  J. Cuesta,et al.  Heterogeneous networks do not promote cooperation when humans play a Prisoner’s Dilemma , 2012, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[29]  Ángel Sánchez,et al.  Evolutionary game theory: Temporal and spatial effects beyond replicator dynamics , 2009, Physics of life reviews.

[30]  P Colet,et al.  Theory of collective firing induced by noise or diversity in excitable media. , 2007, Physical review. E, Statistical, nonlinear, and soft matter physics.

[31]  S. Galam.  Rational group decision making: A random field Ising model at T = 0 , 1997, cond-mat/9702163.

[32]  Simon Gaechter,et al.  Conditional cooperation: Behavioral regularities from the lab and the field and their policy implications , 2006 .

[33]  Friederike Mengel,et al.  Matching structure and the cultural transmission of social norms , 2008 .

[34]  J. Coleman.  Foundations of Social Theory , 1990 .

[35]  G. Szabó,et al.  Evolutionary games on graphs , 2006, cond-mat/0607344.

[36]  Eric A. Posner,et al.  Law and Social Norms , 2002 .

[37]  Gregoire Nicolis,et al.  Stochastic resonance , 2007, Scholarpedia.

[38]  Mathias Spichtig,et al.  Social norms and the indirect evolution of conditional cooperation , 2011 .

[39]  U. Fischbacher,et al.  Are People Conditionally Cooperative? Evidence from a Public Goods Experiment , 2001 .

[40]  Klaus M. Schmidt,et al.  The Economics of Fairness, Reciprocity and Altruism--Experimental Evidence and New Theories. , 2005 .

[41]  Raúl Toral,et al.  The constructive role of diversity in the global response of coupled neuron systems , 2010, Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society A: Mathematical, Physical and Engineering Sciences.

[42]  Dietrich Stauffer.  Sociophysics simulations , 2003, Comput. Sci. Eng..

[43]  Claudio J. Tessone,et al.  Diversity-induced resonance in a model for opinion formation , 2008, 0808.0522.

[44]  Raul Toral,et al.  Mass media and repulsive interactions in continuous-opinion dynamics , 2010, 1004.0103.

[45]  Shore,et al.  Hysteresis and hierarchies: Dynamics of disorder-driven first-order phase transformations. , 1992, Physical review letters.

[46]  Marcel G. Clerc,et al.  A new perspective on stochastic resonance in monostable systems , 2010 .

[47]  E. Ostrom.  Collective action and the evolution of social norms , 2000, Journal of Economic Perspectives.

[48]  Dami'an H. Zanette,et al.  Synchronised firing induced by network dynamics in excitable systems , 2012, 1206.6975.

[49]  Glenn Ellison.  Learning, Local Interaction, and Coordination , 1993 .

[50]  Lourdes Araujo,et al.  Social Experiments in the Mesoscale: Humans Playing a Spatial Prisoner's Dilemma , 2010, PloS one.

[51]  Zhonghuai Hou,et al.  Resonant response of forced complex networks: the role of topological disorder. , 2009, Chaos.

[52]  R Toral,et al.  Resonance induced by repulsive interactions in a model of globally coupled bistable systems. , 2010, Physical review. E, Statistical, nonlinear, and soft matter physics.

[53]  Guillaume Deffuant,et al.  Mixing beliefs among interacting agents , 2000, Adv. Complex Syst..

[54]  K. Schlag.  Why Imitate, and If So, How?, : A Boundedly Rational Approach to Multi-armed Bandits , 1998 .