Research on Fuzzy Linguistic Evaluation in e-Learning Using AHP and TOPSIS Based on Web Resources

This study proposes a holistic approach for determining critical attributes in e-learning measurements. There is an abundance of literature pertaining to the e-learning framework, but there is a shortage of literature on how to properly implement the framework in uncertainty with variance and interactive relationships. This paper also considers the nature of fuzziness in human perception and avoids the erroneous assumptions of conventional analytic hierarchy process (AHP) and Technique for Order Preference by Similarity to Ideal Solution (TOPSIS), proposing a hybrid approach. AHP is employed to weight the criteria in an objective way. Then, TOPSIS is applied to rank the alternatives for this evaluation. In order using the fuzzy theory to represent customer perception based on linguistic assessment aspects in uncertainty. The 4 dependence aspects and 25 interactive criteria were evaluated from a sample of fifteen respondents. The results and concluding remarks are discussed.

[1]  Yi-Shun Wang,et al.  Measuring e-learning systems success in an organizational context: Scale development and validation , 2007, Comput. Hum. Behav..

[2]  M. Hanna.  Data mining in the e‐learning domain , 2004 .

[3]  Hepu Deng,et al.  Multicriteria analysis with fuzzy pairwise comparison , 1999, FUZZ-IEEE'99. 1999 IEEE International Fuzzy Systems. Conference Proceedings (Cat. No.99CH36315).

[4]  Michelle D. Young,et al.  Telecommunication in the Classroom: Rhetoric versus Reality , 1999 .

[5]  Dragan Gasevic,et al.  Ontologies for Effective Use of Context in e-Learning Settings , 2007, J. Educ. Technol. Soc..

[6]  Shyi-Ming Chen,et al.  Forecasting enrollments based on fuzzy time series , 1996, Fuzzy Sets Syst..

[7]  Ru-Jen Chao,et al.  Evaluation of the criteria and effectiveness of distance e-learning with consistent fuzzy preference relations , 2009, Expert Syst. Appl..

[8]  Gwo-Hshiung Tzeng,et al.  Defuzzification within a Multicriteria Decision Model , 2003, Int. J. Uncertain. Fuzziness Knowl. Based Syst..

[9]  M. Bohanec,et al.  The Analytic Hierarchy Process , 2004 .

[10]  Samer Faraj,et al.  Why Should I Share? Examining Social Capital and Knowledge Contribution in Electronic Networks of Practice , 2005, MIS Q..

[11]  Gwo-Hshiung Tzeng,et al.  Evaluating intertwined effects in e-learning programs: A novel hybrid MCDM model based on factor analysis and DEMATEL , 2007, Expert Syst. Appl..

[12]  Guozhen Zhang,et al.  A framework of social interaction support for ubiquitous learning , 2005, 19th International Conference on Advanced Information Networking and Applications (AINA'05) Volume 1 (AINA papers).

[13]  Robert Dixon,et al.  Designing quality e-learning environments in higher education , 2007 .

[14]  Dong-Hyun Jee,et al.  A method for optimal material selection aided with decision making theory , 2000 .

[15]  Michael G. Moore,et al.  Handbook of distance education , 2007 .

[16]  Juan Manuel Campos Benítez,et al.  Using fuzzy number for measuring quality of service in the hotel industry , 2007 .

[17]  R. Aghataher,et al.  A Fuzzy-AHP Decision Support System for Evaluation of Cities Vulnerability Against Earthquakes , 2008 .

[18]  Hassan M. Selim,et al.  Critical success factors for e-learning acceptance: Confirmatory factor models , 2007, Comput. Educ..

[19]  Tien-Chin Wang,et al.  Applying consistent fuzzy preference relations to partnership selection , 2007 .

[20]  Dowming Yeh,et al.  What drives a successful e-Learning? An empirical investigation of the critical factors influencing learner satisfaction , 2008, Comput. Educ..

[21]  Ming-Puu Chen.  An Evaluation of the ELNP e-Learning Quality Assurance Program: Perspectives of Gap Analysis and Innovation Diffusion , 2009, J. Educ. Technol. Soc..

[22]  Yi-Hsuan Chen,et al.  A fuzzy MCDM approach for evaluating banking performance based on Balanced Scorecard , 2009, Expert Syst. Appl..

[23]  John C. Belland,et al.  Is the self-paced instructional program, via microcomputer-based instruction, the most effective method of addressing individual learning differences? , 1985 .

[24]  S. Harris,et al.  Innovative pedagogical practices using ICT in schools in England , 2002, J. Comput. Assist. Learn..

[25]  Sheng-Hshiung Tsaur,et al.  The evaluation of airline service quality by fuzzy MCDM. , 2002 .

[26]  Ching-Lai Hwang,et al.  Multiple Attribute Decision Making: Methods and Applications - A State-of-the-Art Survey , 1981, Lecture Notes in Economics and Mathematical Systems.

[27]  C. Kahraman,et al.  Multi‐criteria supplier selection using fuzzy AHP , 2003 .

[28]  Nian-Shing Chen,et al.  Enhancing the Quality of e-Learning in Virtual Learning Communities by Finding Quality Learning Content and Trustworthy Collaborators , 2007, J. Educ. Technol. Soc..