On collective intentions: collective action in economics and philosophy

Philosophers and economists write about collective action from distinct but related points of view. This paper aims to bridge these perspectives. Economists have been concerned with rationality in a strategic context. There, problems posed by “coordination games” seem to point to a form of rational action, “team thinking,” which is not individualistic. Philosophers’ analyses of collective intention, however, sometimes reduce collective action to a set of individually instrumental actions. They do not, therefore, capture the first person plural perspective characteristic of team thinking. Other analyses, problematically, depict intentions ranging over others’ actions. I offer an analysis of collective intention which avoids these problems. A collective intention aims only at causing an individual action, but its propositional content stipulates its mirroring in other minds.

[1]  Andrew K. Bjerring,et al.  The ‘Tracing Procedure’ and a Theory of Rational Interaction , 1978 .

[2]  D. Stahl,et al.  On Players' Models of Other Players: Theory and Experimental Evidence , 1995 .

[3]  Philip R. Cohen,et al.  Intentions in Communication. , 1992 .

[4]  E. McClennen,et al.  Foundations and Applications of Decision Theory , 1978 .

[5]  R. Sugden,et al.  The Nature of Salience: An Experimental Investigation of Pure Coordination Games , 1994 .

[6]  T. Schelling,et al.  The Strategy of Conflict. , 1961 .

[7]  Margaret Gilbert On Social Facts , 1989 .

[8]  Colin Camerer,et al.  A Cognitive Hierarchy Model of Games , 2004 .

[9]  Michael E. Bratman,et al.  Shared Cooperative Activity , 1991 .

[10]  J. Sartre,et al.  Being and Nothingness , 2022 .

[11]  R. Sugden Thinking as a Team: Towards an Explanation of Nonselfish Behavior , 1993, Social Philosophy and Policy.

[12]  M. Bacharach Interactive team reasoning: A contribution to the theory of co-operation , 1999 .

[13]  R. Shone,et al.  THE THEORY OF CHOICE , 1975 .

[14]  J. Elster Explaining Technical Change , 1983 .

[15]  Brian Skyrms,et al.  Correlated equilibria and the dynamics of rational deliberation , 1989 .

[16]  Teresa McCormack,et al.  Joint attention : communication and other minds : issues in philosophy and psychology , 2005 .

[17]  J. K. Swindler Social Intentions , 1996 .

[18]  David Lewis Convention: A Philosophical Study , 1986 .

[19]  J. Harsanyi The tracing procedure: A Bayesian approach to defining a solution forn-person noncooperative games , 1975 .

[20]  Complicity: Acting Together , 2000 .

[21]  N. Bardsley Interpersonal Interaction and Economic Theory: The Case of Public Goods , 2000 .

[22]  J. Searle Consciousness and Language: Collective Intentions and Actions , 2002 .

[23]  Raimo Tuomela,et al.  A theory of social action , 1984 .

[24]  David Copp,et al.  Utilitarianism and Co-Operation , 1983 .

[25]  R. Sugden A Theory of Focal Points , 1995 .

[26]  R. Tuomela The Importance of Us: A Philosophical Study of Basic Social Notions , 1995 .

[27]  Margaret Gilbert Game theory andconvention , 2005, Synthese.

[28]  D. Regan,et al.  Utilitarianism and Cooperation , 1980 .

[29]  M. Hollis Trust Within Reason , 1998 .

[30]  D. Parfit Reasons and Persons , 1986 .

[31]  Michael E. Bratman,et al.  Faces of Intention: I Intend That We J , 1999 .

[32]  Philip R. Cohen,et al.  Collective Intentions and Actions , 2003 .

[33]  J. David Velleman,et al.  How To Share An Intention , 1997 .