Effect of Pixel Height, Display Height, and Vertical Resolution on the Detection of a Simple Vertical Line Signal in Visual Noise

Spatial resolution is one of the parameters that engineers designing digital displays must consider. Three experiments are described that investigate the effects of vertical spatial resolution and the interrelated parameters, pixel height and display height, on the visibility of straight vertical line signals in visual noise. A signal detection analysis of the results showed that detection efficiency was unaffected by vertical resolution and pixel height, whereas an increase in display/signal height resulted in a decline in efficiency. The decline is attributed to the increasing difficulty the visual system encounters when integrating luminance over an increasing spatial extent. It is suggested that in practical digital displays of the kind described here, pixels should be as short as possible in order that the available display information be compressed into the smallest possible height.

[1]  D. Rose Mechanisms underlying the receptive field properties of neurons in cat visual cortex , 1979, Vision Research.

[2]  Andrew C. Sleigh,et al.  Physical and Biological Processing of Images , 1983 .

[3]  K. Nakayama,et al.  Line length detectors in the human visual system: evidence from selective adaptation. , 1972, Vision research.

[4]  T. Cohn,et al.  Spatial summation of foveal increments and decrements , 1975, Vision Research.

[5]  P. O. Bishop,et al.  Hypercomplex and simple/complex cell classifications in cat striate cortex. , 1978, Journal of neurophysiology.

[6]  B. Julesz,et al.  Early visual perception. , 1981, Annual review of psychology.

[7]  D H HUBEL,et al.  RECEPTIVE FIELDS AND FUNCTIONAL ARCHITECTURE IN TWO NONSTRIATE VISUAL AREAS (18 AND 19) OF THE CAT. , 1965, Journal of neurophysiology.

[8]  H. Barlow The efficiency of detecting changes of density in random dot patterns , 1978, Vision Research.

[9]  H. Barlow,et al.  The versatility and absolute efficiency of detecting mirror symmetry in random dot displays , 1979, Vision Research.

[10]  J A Swets,et al.  Repeated observation of an uncertain signal. , 1978, Perception & psychophysics.

[11]  Effect of the number of grey levels on the detectability of a simple line signal in visual noise. , 1987, Spatial vision.

[12]  D. Hubel,et al.  Receptive fields, binocular interaction and functional architecture in the cat's visual cortex , 1962, The Journal of physiology.

[13]  P. O. Bishop,et al.  Spatial vision. , 1971, Annual review of psychology.

[14]  F Kingdom,et al.  Digitized Images: What Type of Grey Scale Should One Use? , 1986, Perception.

[15]  F. Kingdom,et al.  Effect of pixel width, display width, and number of alternative signal locations on the detection of a simple vertical-line signal in visual noise , 1988, Perception & psychophysics.

[16]  G. J. Burton,et al.  Visual adaptation to patterns containing two-dimensional spatial structure , 1978, Vision Research.

[17]  A E Burgess,et al.  Visual signal detection. II. Signal-location identification. , 1984, Journal of the Optical Society of America. A, Optics and image science.