Receptive fields of single cells and topography in mouse visual cortex

The visual cortex was studied in the mouse (C57 Black/6J strain) by recording from single units, and a topographic map of the visual field was constructed. Forty‐five percent of the neurons in striate cortex responded best to oriented line stimuli moving over their receptive fields; they were classified as simple (17%), complex (25%) and hypercomplex (3%). Of all preferred orientations horizontal was most common. Fifty‐five percent of receptive fields were cicularly symmetric: these were on‐center (25%), off‐center (7%) and homogeneous on‐off in type (23%). Optimal stimulus velocities were much higher than those reported in the cat, mostly varying between 20° and 300°/sec. The field of vision common to the two eyes projected to more than one‐third of the striate cortex. Although the contralateral eye provided the dominating influence on cells in this binocular area, more than two‐thirds of cells could also be driven through the ipsilateral eye. The topography of area 17 was similar to that found in other mammals: the upper visual field projected posteriorly, the most nasal part mapped onto the lateral border. Here the projection did not end at the vertical meridian passing through the animal's long axis, but proceeded for at least 10° into the ipsilateral hemifield of vision, so that at least 20° of visual field were represented in both hemispheres. The magnification in area 17 was rather uniform throughout the visual field. In an area latral to area 17 (18a) the fields were projected in condensed mirror image fashion with respect to the arrangement of area 17. Medial to area 17 a third visual area (area 18) was again related to 17 as a condensed mirror image.

[1]  C. Rocha-Miranda,et al.  Receptive fields in the visual cortex of the opossum. , 1973, Brain Research.

[2]  J. Stone,et al.  The naso‐temporal division of the monkey's retina , 1973, The Journal of comparative neurology.

[3]  D. Whitteridge,et al.  The visual areas in the splenial sulcus of the cat , 1973, The Journal of physiology.

[4]  W. C. Hall,et al.  Visual cortex of the tree shrew (Tupaia glis): architectonic subdivisions and representations of the visual field. , 1972, Brain research.

[5]  D. Montemurro,et al.  A stereotaxic atlas of the diencephalon and related structures of the mouse , 1972 .

[6]  J. Kaas,et al.  Representation of the visual field in striate and adjoining cortex of the owl monkey (Aotus trivirgatus). , 1971, Brain research.

[7]  D. L. Stewart,et al.  Receptive field characteristics of striate cortical neurons in the rabbit. , 1971, Brain research.

[8]  W. C. Hall,et al.  Cortical visual areas in the grey squirrel (Sciurus carolinesis): a correlation between cortical evoked potential maps and architectonic subdivisions. , 1971, Journal of neurophysiology.

[9]  B. Grafstein Transneuronal Transfer of Radioactivity in the Central Nervous System , 1971, Science.

[10]  W. C. Hall,et al.  Cortical visual areas I and II in the hedgehog: relation between evoked potential maps and architectonic subdivisions. , 1970, Journal of neurophysiology.

[11]  F. Fraunfelder,et al.  Acute reversible lens opacity: caused by drugs, cold, anoxia, asphyxia, stress, death and dehydration. , 1970, Experimental Eye Research.

[12]  M. Millodot,et al.  Retinoscopy and Eye Size , 1970, Science.

[13]  A. Adams,et al.  The projection of the rat's visual field on the cerebral cortex. , 1968, Quarterly journal of experimental physiology and cognate medical sciences.

[14]  F. Valverde,et al.  Peristriate cortex of mouse: location and the effects of enucleation on the number of dendritic spines. , 1968, Brain research.

[15]  D. Hubel,et al.  Receptive fields and functional architecture of monkey striate cortex , 1968, The Journal of physiology.

[16]  R. Snider Catalog of the Neurological Mutants of the Mouse , 1967, Neurology.

[17]  T A Woolsey,et al.  Somatosensory, auditory and visual cortical areas of the mouse. , 1967, The Johns Hopkins medical journal.

[18]  J. Stone,et al.  The naso-temporal division of the cat's retina. , 1966, The Journal of comparative neurology.

[19]  G. Baumgartner,et al.  RESPONSES OF SINGLE UNITS OF THE CAT VISUAL SYSTEM TO RECTANGULAR STIMULUS PATTERNS. , 1965, Journal of neurophysiology.

[20]  H. Barlow,et al.  Retinal ganglion cells responding selectively to direction and speed of image motion in the rabbit , 1964, The Journal of physiology.

[21]  D. Hubel,et al.  Receptive fields, binocular interaction and functional architecture in the cat's visual cortex , 1962, The Journal of physiology.

[22]  D. Whitteridge,et al.  The representation of the visual field on the cerebral cortex in monkeys , 1961, The Journal of physiology.

[23]  D. Hubel Single unit activity in lateral geniculate body and optic tract of unrestrained cats , 1960, The Journal of physiology.

[24]  S. A. Talbot,et al.  Visual areas I and II of cerebral cortex of rabbit. , 1950, Federation proceedings.

[25]  W. Krieg Connections of the cerebral cortex. I. The albino rat. A. Topography of the cortical areas , 1946 .