Autonomous Underwater Vehicle trajectory design coupled with predictive ocean models: A case study

Data collection using Autonomous Underwater Vehicles (AUVs) is increasing in importance within the oceanographic research community. Contrary to traditional moored or static platforms, mobile sensors require intelligent planning strategies to maneuver through the ocean. However, the ability to navigate to high-value locations and collect data with specific scientific merit is worth the planning efforts. In this study, we examine the use of ocean model predictions to determine the locations to be visited by an AUV, and aid in planning the trajectory that the vehicle executes during the sampling mission. The objectives are: a) to provide near-real time, in situ measurements to a large-scale ocean model to increase the skill of future predictions, and b) to utilize ocean model predictions as a component in an end-to-end autonomous prediction and tasking system for aquatic, mobile sensor networks. We present an algorithm designed to generate paths for AUVs to track a dynamically evolving ocean feature utilizing ocean model predictions. This builds on previous work in this area by incorporating the predicted current velocities into the path planning to assist in solving the 3-D motion planning problem of steering an AUV between two selected locations. We present simulation results for tracking a fresh water plume by use of our algorithm. Additionally, we present experimental results from field trials that test the skill of the model used as well as the incorporation of the model predictions into an AUV trajectory planner. These results indicate a modest, but measurable, improvement in surfacing error when the model predictions are incorporated into the planner.

[1]  Gaurav S. Sukhatme,et al.  Informative path planning for an autonomous underwater vehicle , 2010, 2010 IEEE International Conference on Robotics and Automation.

[2]  Gaurav S. Sukhatme,et al.  Towards marine bloom trajectory prediction for AUV mission planning , 2010, 2010 IEEE International Conference on Robotics and Automation.

[3]  Gaurav S. Sukhatme,et al.  Trajectory Design for Autonomous Underwater Vehicles Based on Ocean Model Predictions for Feature Tracking , 2009, FSR.

[4]  David A. Siegel,et al.  Rapid downward transport of the neurotoxin domoic acid in coastal waters. , 2009 .

[5]  K. Ide,et al.  A Three-Dimensional Variational Data Assimilation Scheme for the Regional Ocean Modeling System , 2008 .

[6]  Gaurav S. Sukhatme,et al.  USC CINAPS Builds Bridges , 2010, IEEE Robotics & Automation Magazine.

[7]  E. L. Nelson,et al.  AUV path planning: an A* approach to path planning with consideration of variable vehicle speeds and multiple, overlapping, time-dependent exclusion zones , 1992, Proceedings of the 1992 Symposium on Autonomous Underwater Vehicle Technology.

[8]  Naomi Ehrich Leonard,et al.  Model-based feedback control of autonomous underwater gliders , 2001 .

[9]  Gaurav S. Sukhatme,et al.  Implementation of an embedded sensor network for the coordination of Slocum gliders for coastal monitoring and observation , 2009, WUWNet.

[10]  Jonathan A. Warrick,et al.  Dispersal scaling from the world's rivers , 2004 .

[11]  Joshua Grady Graver,et al.  UNDERWATER GLIDERS: DYNAMICS, CONTROL AND DESIGN , 2005 .

[12]  Yan Pailhas,et al.  Path Planning for Autonomous Underwater Vehicles , 2007, IEEE Transactions on Robotics.

[13]  Ryan N. Smith Geometric Control Theory and its Application to Underwater Vehicles , 2008 .

[14]  James C. McWilliams,et al.  Quasi-Monotone Advection Schemes Based on Explicit Locally Adaptive Dissipation , 1998 .

[15]  Oscar Schofield,et al.  Slocum Gliders: Robust and ready , 2007, J. Field Robotics.

[16]  Gabriel Oliver,et al.  Path Planning of Autonomous Underwater Vehicles in Current Fields with Complex Spatial Variability: an A* Approach , 2005, Proceedings of the 2005 IEEE International Conference on Robotics and Automation.

[17]  Stephen B. Weisberg,et al.  Blooms of Pseudo-nitzschia and domoic acid in the San Pedro Channel and Los Angeles harbor areas of the Southern California Bight, 2003-2004 , 2007 .

[18]  A. Caiti,et al.  Evolutionary path planning for autonomous underwater vehicles in a variable ocean , 2004, IEEE Journal of Oceanic Engineering.

[19]  Gaurav S. Sukhatme,et al.  USC CINAPS Builds bridges : observing and monitoring the southern california bight , 2010 .

[20]  Russ E. Davis,et al.  E 2008, by the American Society of Limnology and Oceanography, Inc. Glider surveillance of physics and biology in the southern California Current System , 2022 .

[21]  Alexander F. Shchepetkin,et al.  The regional oceanic modeling system (ROMS): a split-explicit, free-surface, topography-following-coordinate oceanic model , 2005 .

[22]  Matthew Dunbabin,et al.  Go with the flow : optimal AUV path planning in coastal environments , 2009, ICRA 2009.