An Experimental Comparison of Classical, FOND and Probabilistic Planning

Domain-independent planning in general is broadly applicable to a wide range of tasks. Many formalisms exist that allow the description of different aspects of realistic problems. Which one to use is often no obvious choice, since a higher degree of expressiveness usually comes with an increased planning time and/or a decreased policy quality. Under the assumption that hard guarantees are not required, users are faced with a decision between multiple approaches. As a generic model we use a probabilistic description in the form of Markov Decision Processes (MDPs). We define abstracting translations into a classical planning formalism and fully observable nondeterministic planning. Our goal is to give insight into how state-of-the-art systems perform on different MDP planning domains.

[1]  Oussama Khatib,et al.  Robot task planning with contingencies for run-time sensing , 2013, ICRA 2013.

[2]  Yaxin Bi,et al.  Combining rough decisions for intelligent text mining using Dempster’s rule , 2006, Artificial Intelligence Review.

[3]  Bernhard Nebel,et al.  Task Planning for an Autonomous Service Robot , 2012, Towards Service Robots for Everyday Environments.

[4]  Thomas Keller,et al.  A Polynomial All Outcome Determinization for Probabilistic Planning , 2011, ICAPS.

[5]  Leslie Pack Kaelbling,et al.  Integrated task and motion planning in belief space , 2013, Int. J. Robotics Res..

[6]  Malte Helmert,et al.  Trial-Based Heuristic Tree Search for Finite Horizon MDPs , 2013, ICAPS.

[7]  Jonathan Schaeffer,et al.  Searching with Pattern Databases , 1996, Canadian Conference on AI.

[8]  Sylvie Thiébaux,et al.  Probabilistic planning vs replanning , 2007 .

[9]  Tanja Schultz,et al.  KI 2010: Advances in Artificial Intelligence , 2010, Lecture Notes in Computer Science.

[10]  Leslie Pack Kaelbling,et al.  Hierarchical task and motion planning in the now , 2011, 2011 IEEE International Conference on Robotics and Automation.

[11]  Bernhard Nebel,et al.  How Much Does a Household Robot Need to Know in Order to Tidy Up , 2013, AAAI 2013.

[12]  Farokh B. Bastani,et al.  Proceedings of the Twenty-Second International Joint Conference on Artificial Intelligence Simple and Fast Strong Cyclic Planning for Fully-Observable Nondeterministic Planning Problems �� , 2022 .

[13]  Thomas Keller,et al.  PROST: Probabilistic Planning Based on UCT , 2012, ICAPS.

[14]  Patrik Haslum,et al.  Domain-Independent Construction of Pattern Database Heuristics for Cost-Optimal Planning , 2007, AAAI.

[15]  Christian J. Muise,et al.  Improved Non-Deterministic Planning by Exploiting State Relevance , 2012, ICAPS.

[16]  Shlomo Zilberstein,et al.  LAO*: A heuristic search algorithm that finds solutions with loops , 2001, Artif. Intell..

[17]  Robert P. Goldman,et al.  Using Classical Planners to Solve Nondeterministic Planning Problems , 2008, ICAPS.

[18]  Craig Boutilier,et al.  Stochastic dynamic programming with factored representations , 2000, Artif. Intell..

[19]  Malte Helmert,et al.  Pattern Database Heuristics for Fully Observable Nondeterministic Planning , 2010, ICAPS.

[20]  Malte Helmert,et al.  The Fast Downward Planning System , 2006, J. Artif. Intell. Res..