Visual grating induction.

If a homogeneous illuminated test field is inserted within a sine-wave grating, an opposite phase grating will be perceived in the test field under a wide range of conditions. A cancellation technique was used to measure the magnitude of grating induction. The manner in which the effect depends on eye movements, inducing frequency, test-field height, inducing-field height, inducing amplitude, test-field luminance, and test-field width was determined in four experiments. Mathematical equations that describe these results are presented. It is shown that linear filters whose spatial weighting functions resemble receptive fields of the most common types of visual cell do not produce outputs with the properties of induced gratings. However, linear filters with highly elongated negative end zones and a small positive center produce opposite phase gratings in the test field, and an array of such filters of different sizes can account for several properties of induced gratings. There are other properties of the effect that are highly nonlinear. A second model, which is nonlinear and based on the properties of hypercomplex cells, is suggested that may encompass both the linear and the nonlinear properties of the effect.

[1]  Jiro Gyoba,et al.  Stationary phantoms: A completion effect without motion and flicker , 1983, Vision Research.

[2]  T R Vidyasagar,et al.  Response of neurons in the cat's lateral geniculate nucleus to moving bars of different length , 1983, The Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience.

[3]  M. McCourt A spatial frequency dependent grating-induction effect , 1982, Vision Research.

[4]  Tom Troscianko,et al.  A stereoscopic presentation of the hermann grid , 1982, Vision Research.

[5]  D H Kelly,et al.  Motion and vision. IV. Isotropic and anisotropic spatial responses. , 1982, Journal of the Optical Society of America.

[6]  R. Sekuler,et al.  Thresholds for Seeing Visual Phantoms and Moving Gratings , 1982, Perception.

[7]  C. Roy Genter,et al.  Flickering phantoms: A motion illusion without motion , 1981, Vision Research.

[8]  L. Palmer,et al.  Receptive-field structure in cat striate cortex. , 1981, Journal of neurophysiology.

[9]  M White,et al.  The Effect of the Nature of the Surround on the Perceived Lightness of Grey Bars within Square-Wave Test Gratings , 1981, Perception.

[10]  J. M. Foley,et al.  Contrast masking in human vision. , 1980, Journal of the Optical Society of America.

[11]  J. Bergen,et al.  A four mechanism model for threshold spatial vision , 1979, Vision Research.

[12]  M. White,et al.  A New Effect of Pattern on Perceived Lightness , 1979, Perception.

[13]  P. O. Bishop,et al.  End-zone region in receptive fields of hypercomplex and other striate neurons in the cat. , 1979, Journal of neurophysiology.

[14]  P. O. Bishop,et al.  Dimensions and properties of end-zone inhibitory areas in receptive fields of hypercomplex cells in cat striate cortex. , 1979, Journal of neurophysiology.

[15]  Arthur P Ginsburg,et al.  Visual Information Processing Based on Spatial Filters Constrained by Biological Data. , 1978 .

[16]  P. O. Bishop,et al.  Hypercomplex and simple/complex cell classifications in cat striate cortex. , 1978, Journal of neurophysiology.

[17]  N. Weisstein,et al.  A phantom-motion aftereffect. , 1977, Science.

[18]  A. Sillito The spatial extent of excitatory and inhibitory zones in the receptive field of superficial layer hypercomplex cells , 1977, The Journal of physiology.

[19]  G. Henry Receptive field classes of cells in the striate cortex of the cat , 1977, Brain Research.

[20]  P. Schiller,et al.  Quantitative studies of single-cell properties in monkey striate cortex. I. Spatiotemporal organization of receptive fields. , 1976, Journal of neurophysiology.

[21]  P Tynan,et al.  Moving visual phantoms: a new contour completion effect. , 1975, Science.

[22]  P. O. Bishop,et al.  Striate neurons: receptive field concepts. , 1972, Investigative ophthalmology.

[23]  B. Dreher Hypercomplex cells in the cat's striate cortex. , 1972, Investigative ophthalmology.

[24]  Eric G. Heinemann,et al.  Simultaneous Brightness Induction , 1972 .

[25]  A. Fiorentini Mach Band Phenomena , 1972 .

[26]  G. Békésy Mach- and hering-type lateral inhibition in vision , 1968 .

[27]  D H HUBEL,et al.  RECEPTIVE FIELDS AND FUNCTIONAL ARCHITECTURE IN TWO NONSTRIATE VISUAL AREAS (18 AND 19) OF THE CAT. , 1965, Journal of neurophysiology.

[28]  É. D. L. Tour,et al.  Nouvelles observations concernant l’action du laurylsulfate de sodium sur la paroi et la membrane d’E. coli , 1965 .

[29]  D. Hubel,et al.  Receptive fields, binocular interaction and functional architecture in the cat's visual cortex , 1962, The Journal of physiology.

[30]  G. Békésy Neural inhibitory units of the eye and skin. Quantitative description of contrast phenomena. , 1960, Journal of the Optical Society of America.