Ultra Rapid Object Categorization: Effects of Level, Animacy and Context

It is widely agreed that in object categorization bottom-up and top-down influences interact. How top-down processes affect categorization has been primarily investigated in isolation, with only one higher level process at a time being manipulated. Here, we investigate the combination of different top-down influences (by varying the level of category, the animacy and the background of the object) and their effect on rapid object categorization. Subjects participated in a two-alternative forced choice rapid categorization task, while we measured accuracy and reaction times. Subjects had to categorize objects on the superordinate, basic or subordinate level. Objects belonged to the category animal or vehicle and each object was presented on a gray, congruent (upright) or incongruent (inverted) background. The results show that each top-down manipulation impacts object categorization and that they interact strongly. The best categorization was achieved on the superordinate level, providing no advantage for basic level in rapid categorization. Categorization between vehicles was faster than between animals on the basic level and vice versa on the subordinate level. Objects in homogenous gray background (context) yielded better overall performance than objects embedded in complex scenes, an effect most prominent on the subordinate level. An inverted background had no negative effect on object categorization compared to upright scenes. These results show how different top-down manipulations, such as category level, category type and background information, are related. We discuss the implications of top-down interactions on the interpretation of categorization results.

[1]  Shlomo Bentin,et al.  Stimulus type, level of categorization, and spatial-frequencies utilization: implications for perceptual categorization hierarchies. , 2009, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[2]  L. Tyler,et al.  A progressive category-specific semantic deficit for non-living things , 2000, Neuropsychologia.

[3]  I. Biederman,et al.  Scene perception: Detecting and judging objects undergoing relational violations , 1982, Cognitive Psychology.

[4]  J. Henderson,et al.  Does consistent scene context facilitate object perception? , 1998, Journal of experimental psychology. General.

[5]  Stephen M. Kosslyn,et al.  Pictures and names: Making the connection , 1984, Cognitive Psychology.

[6]  Thomas Serre,et al.  What are the Visual Features Underlying Rapid Object Recognition? , 2011, Front. Psychology.

[7]  J. Tanaka,et al.  Object categories and expertise: Is the basic level in the eye of the beholder? , 1991, Cognitive Psychology.

[8]  B. Mesquita,et al.  Adjustment to Chronic Diseases and Terminal Illness Health Psychology : Psychological Adjustment to Chronic Disease , 2006 .

[9]  Leslie G. Ungerleider,et al.  Object representations in the temporal cortex of monkeys and humans as revealed by functional magnetic resonance imaging. , 2009, Journal of neurophysiology.

[10]  Lester C. Loschky,et al.  The natural/man-made distinction is made before basic-level distinctions in scene gist processing , 2010 .

[11]  R. D. Gordon,et al.  Contextual influences on rapid object categorization in natural scenes , 2011, Brain Research.

[12]  J. Rodd,et al.  Processing Objects at Different Levels of Specificity , 2004, Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience.

[13]  M. Bar,et al.  Early onset of neural synchronization in the contextual associations network , 2011, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[14]  J. Henderson,et al.  High-level scene perception. , 1999, Annual review of psychology.

[15]  Olivier R. Joubert,et al.  Animal Detection Precedes Access to Scene Category , 2012, PloS one.

[16]  Denis Fize,et al.  Speed of processing in the human visual system , 1996, Nature.

[17]  Thomas Serre,et al.  A feedforward architecture accounts for rapid categorization , 2007, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[18]  George A. Alvarez,et al.  Natural-Scene Perception Requires Attention , 2011, Psychological science.

[19]  Wayne D. Gray,et al.  Basic objects in natural categories , 1976, Cognitive Psychology.

[20]  L. Saksida,et al.  The organization of visual object representations: a connectionist model of effects of lesions in perirhinal cortex , 2002, The European journal of neuroscience.

[21]  Guillaume A. Rousselet,et al.  Early interference of context congruence on object processing in rapid visual categorization of natural scenes. , 2008, Journal of vision.

[22]  P. Perona,et al.  Rapid natural scene categorization in the near absence of attention , 2002, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[23]  Kathy E. Johnson,et al.  Effects of varying levels of expertise on the basic level of categorization. , 1997, Journal of experimental psychology. General.

[24]  Marzia Del Zotto,et al.  The emergence of semantic categorization in early visual processing: ERP indices of animal vs. artifact recognition , 2007, BMC Neuroscience.

[25]  Hans-Jochen Heinze,et al.  Speed limits 2 Running head : SPEED LIMITS IN NATURAL SCENE DISCRIMINATION Speed Limits : Orientation and Semantic Context Interactions Constrain Natural Scene Discrimination Dynamics , 2007 .

[26]  Olivier R. Joubert,et al.  The Time-Course of Visual Categorizations: You Spot the Animal Faster than the Bird , 2009, PloS one.

[27]  M. Bar,et al.  Top-down facilitation of visual object recognition: object-based and context-based contributions. , 2006, Progress in brain research.

[28]  Jodi L. Davenport,et al.  Scene Consistency in Object and Background Perception , 2004, Psychological science.

[29]  Shimon Ullman,et al.  Basic-level categorization of intermediate complexity fragments reveals top-down effects of expertise in visual perception. , 2011, Journal of vision.

[30]  Bradford Z. Mahon,et al.  Concepts and categories: a cognitive neuropsychological perspective. , 2009, Annual review of psychology.

[31]  K. S. Purdy,et al.  Category-specific effects on the identification of non-manipulable objects , 2006, Brain and Cognition.

[32]  S. Thorpe,et al.  The Time Course of Visual Processing: From Early Perception to Decision-Making , 2001, Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience.

[33]  Charles A. Collin,et al.  Subordinate-level categorization relies on high spatial frequencies to a greater degree than basic-level categorization , 2005, Perception & psychophysics.

[34]  Michelle R. Greene,et al.  PSYCHOLOGICAL SCIENCE Research Article The Briefest of Glances The Time Course of Natural Scene Understanding , 2022 .

[35]  Glyn W. Humphreys,et al.  A tale of two agnosias: Distinctions between form and integrative agnosia , 2008, Cognitive neuropsychology.

[36]  R. Brown How shall a thing be called. , 1958, Psychological review.

[37]  Manila Vannucci,et al.  Hemispheric asymmetry for spatially filtered stimuli belonging to different semantic categories. , 2004, Brain research. Cognitive brain research.

[38]  T. Rogers,et al.  Object categorization: reversals and explanations of the basic-level advantage. , 2007, Journal of experimental psychology. General.

[39]  Denis Cousineau,et al.  The rise of quantitative methods in psychology , 2005 .

[40]  M. Viggiano,et al.  Category-specific visual recognition as affected by aging and expertise. , 2006, Archives of gerontology and geriatrics.

[41]  L. Cosmides,et al.  Category-specific attention for animals reflects ancestral priorities, not expertise , 2007, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[42]  Olivier R. Joubert,et al.  How long to get to the “gist” of real-world natural scenes? , 2005 .

[43]  G. Humphreys,et al.  Hierarchies, similarity, and interactivity in object recognition: “Category-specific” neuropsychological deficits , 2001, Behavioral and Brain Sciences.

[44]  A. Treisman,et al.  Perception of objects in natural scenes: is it really attention free? , 2005, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[45]  Arnaud Delorme,et al.  Key Visual Features for Rapid Categorization of Animals in Natural Scenes , 2010, Front. Psychology.

[46]  Robert T. Knight,et al.  Top-down Enhancement and Suppression of the Magnitude and Speed of Neural Activity , 2005, Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience.

[47]  Michèle Fabre-Thorpe,et al.  The Characteristics and Limits of Rapid Visual Categorization , 2011, Front. Psychology.

[48]  Rainer Goebel,et al.  From Coarse to Fine? Spatial and Temporal Dynamics of Cortical Face Processing , 2010, Cerebral cortex.

[49]  Michèle Fabre-Thorpe,et al.  Interaction of top-down and bottom-up processing in the fast visual analysis of natural scenes. , 2004, Brain research. Cognitive brain research.

[50]  Antonio Torralba,et al.  Statistics of natural image categories , 2003, Network.

[51]  M. Kiefer,et al.  Perceptual and semantic sources of category-specific effects: Event-related potentials during picture and word categorization , 2001, Memory & cognition.

[52]  T. Shallice,et al.  Category specific semantic impairments. , 1998, Brain : a journal of neurology.

[53]  Richard D. Morey,et al.  Confidence Intervals from Normalized Data: A correction to Cousineau (2005) , 2008 .

[54]  Guillaume A. Rousselet,et al.  Processing scene context: Fast categorization and object interference , 2007, Vision Research.

[55]  Alex Martin,et al.  Experience-dependent modulation of category-related cortical activity. , 2002, Cerebral cortex.

[56]  Sébastien M. Crouzet,et al.  Fast saccades toward faces: face detection in just 100 ms. , 2010, Journal of vision.

[57]  Michael L. Mack,et al.  Modeling categorization of scenes containing consistent versus inconsistent objects. , 2010, Journal of vision.

[58]  Christian Gerlach,et al.  A Review of Functional Imaging Studies on Category Specificity , 2007, Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience.

[59]  R VanRullen,et al.  Is it a Bird? Is it a Plane? Ultra-Rapid Visual Categorisation of Natural and Artifactual Objects , 2001, Perception.

[60]  W. Einhäuser,et al.  Animal detection and identification in natural scenes: image statistics and emotional valence. , 2012, Journal of vision.

[61]  A. Caramazza,et al.  Category-Specific Organization in the Human Brain Does Not Require Visual Experience , 2009, Neuron.

[62]  A. Oliva,et al.  Diagnostic Colors Mediate Scene Recognition , 2000, Cognitive Psychology.

[63]  Li Fei-Fei,et al.  Neural mechanisms of rapid natural scene categorization in human visual cortex , 2009, Nature.

[64]  S. Ullman,et al.  Spatial Context in Recognition , 1996, Perception.

[65]  A. Oliva,et al.  Dr. Angry and Mr. Smile: when categorization flexibly modifies the perception of faces in rapid visual presentations , 1999, Cognition.