Distinguishing discrete and continuous behavioral variability using warped autoregressive HMMs

A core goal in systems neuroscience and neuroethology is to understand how neural circuits generate naturalistic behavior. One foundational idea is that complex naturalistic behavior may be composed of sequences of stereotyped behavioral syllables, which combine to generate rich sequences of actions. To investigate this, a common approach is to use autoregressive hidden Markov models (ARHMMs) to segment video into discrete behavioral syllables. While these approaches have been successful in extracting syllables that are interpretable, they fail to account for other forms of behavioral variability, such as differences in speed, which may be better described as continuous in nature. To overcome these limitations, we introduce a class of warped ARHMMs (WARHMM). As is the case in the ARHMM, behavior is modeled as a mixture of autoregressive dynamics. However, the dynamics under each discrete latent state (i.e. each behavioral syllable) are additionally modulated by a continuous latent “warping variable.” We present two versions of warped ARHMM in which the warping variable affects the dynamics of each syllable either linearly or nonlinearly. Using depth-camera recordings of freely moving mice, we demonstrate that the failure of ARHMMs to account for continuous behavioral variability results in duplicate cluster assignments. WARHMM achieves similar performance to the standard ARHMM while using fewer behavioral syllables. Further analysis of behavioral measurements in mice demonstrates that WARHMM identifies structure relating to response vigor.

[1]  Ann Kennedy The what, how, and why of naturalistic behavior , 2022, Current Opinion in Neurobiology.

[2]  Mackenzie W. Mathis,et al.  Learnable latent embeddings for joint behavioural and neural analysis , 2022, Nature.

[3]  S. Remy,et al.  Identifying behavioral structure from deep variational embeddings of animal motion , 2020, bioRxiv.

[4]  J. Assad,et al.  Slowly evolving dopaminergic activity modulates the moment-to-moment probability of reward-related self-timed movements , 2021, eLife.

[5]  G. Goodhill,et al.  Unsupervised quantification of naturalistic animal behaviors for gaining insight into the brain , 2021, Current Opinion in Neurobiology.

[6]  Matthew R Whiteway,et al.  Partitioning variability in animal behavioral videos using semi-supervised variational autoencoders , 2021, bioRxiv.

[7]  E. Yttri,et al.  B-SOiD, an open-source unsupervised algorithm for identification and fast prediction of behaviors , 2019, Nature Communications.

[8]  Rajesh P. N. Rao,et al.  Time-varying Autoregression with Low Rank Tensors , 2019, SIAM J. Appl. Dyn. Syst..

[9]  Lisa M. Giocomo,et al.  Flexible analysis of animal behavior via time-resolved manifold embedding , 2020 .

[10]  B. Sabatini,et al.  Anatomically segregated basal ganglia pathways allow parallel behavioral modulation , 2020, Nature Neuroscience.

[11]  Matthew J. Johnson,et al.  Revealing the structure of pharmacobehavioral space through Motion Sequencing , 2020, Nature Neuroscience.

[12]  Surya Ganguli,et al.  Discovering Precise Temporal Patterns in Large-Scale Neural Recordings through Robust and Interpretable Time Warping , 2019, Neuron.

[13]  David J. Anderson,et al.  Computational Neuroethology: A Call to Action , 2019, Neuron.

[14]  Scott W. Linderman,et al.  BehaveNet: nonlinear embedding and Bayesian neural decoding of behavioral videos , 2019, NeurIPS.

[15]  Jacob M. Graving,et al.  DeepPoseKit, a software toolkit for fast and robust animal pose estimation using deep learning , 2019, bioRxiv.

[16]  Mikhail Kislin,et al.  Fast animal pose estimation using deep neural networks , 2018, Nature Methods.

[17]  Kevin M. Cury,et al.  DeepLabCut: markerless pose estimation of user-defined body parts with deep learning , 2018, Nature Neuroscience.

[18]  Maneesh Sahani,et al.  Temporal alignment and latent Gaussian process factor inference in population spike trains , 2018, bioRxiv.

[19]  Benjamin L. de Bivort,et al.  Ethology as a physical science , 2018, Nature Physics.

[20]  M. A. MacIver,et al.  Neuroscience Needs Behavior: Correcting a Reductionist Bias , 2017, Neuron.

[21]  J. Krakauer,et al.  The basal ganglia: from motor commands to the control of vigor , 2016, Current Opinion in Neurobiology.

[22]  Ryan P. Adams,et al.  Mapping Sub-Second Structure in Mouse Behavior , 2015, Neuron.

[23]  Yi Li,et al.  Dopamine Is Required for the Neural Representation and Control of Movement Vigor , 2015, Cell.

[24]  R. Barker,et al.  Dopamine and Huntington’s disease , 2015, Expert review of neurotherapeutics.

[25]  R. Kerr,et al.  Discovery of Brainwide Neural-Behavioral Maps via Multiscale Unsupervised Structure Learning , 2014, Science.

[26]  William Bialek,et al.  Mapping the stereotyped behaviour of freely moving fruit flies , 2013, Journal of The Royal Society Interface.

[27]  William Bialek,et al.  Searching for simplicity in the analysis of neurons and behavior , 2010, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[28]  O. Cappé,et al.  On‐line expectation–maximization algorithm for latent data models , 2009 .

[29]  J. Krakauer,et al.  Why Don't We Move Faster? Parkinson's Disease, Movement Vigor, and Implicit Motivation , 2007, The Journal of Neuroscience.

[30]  P. Dayan,et al.  Tonic dopamine: opportunity costs and the control of response vigor , 2007, Psychopharmacology.

[31]  Michael I. Jordan,et al.  Factorial Hidden Markov Models , 1995, Machine Learning.

[32]  Patrik Brundin,et al.  Pathogenesis of parkinson's disease: dopamine, vesicles and α-synuclein , 2002, Nature Reviews Neuroscience.

[33]  D. Rubin,et al.  Maximum likelihood from incomplete data via the EM - algorithm plus discussions on the paper , 1977 .

[34]  H. Evans The Study of Instinct , 1952 .