Poker is ideal for testing automated reasoning under uncertainty. It introduces uncertainty both by physical randomization and by incomplete information about opponents' hands. Another source of uncertainty is the limited information available to construct psychological models of opponents, their tendencies to bluff, play conservatively, reveal weakness, etc. and the relation between their hand strengths and betting behaviour. All of these uncertainties must be assessed accurately and combined effectively for any reasonable level of skill in the game to be achieved, since good decision making is highly sensitive to those tasks. We describe our Bayesian Poker Program (BPP), which uses a Bayesian network to model the program's poker hand, the opponent's hand and the opponent's playing behaviour conditioned upon the hand, and betting curves which govern play given a probability of winning. The history of play with opponents is used to improve BPP's understanding of their behaviour. We compare BPP experimentally with: a simple rule-based system; a program which depends exclusively on hand probabilities (i.e., without opponent modeling); and with human players. BPP has shown itself to be an effective player against all these opponents, barring the better humans. We also sketch out some likely ways of improving play.
[1]
Nicholas V. Findler,et al.
Studies in machine cognition using the game of poker
,
1977,
CACM.
[2]
Avi Pfeffer,et al.
Representations and Solutions for Game-Theoretic Problems
,
1997,
Artif. Intell..
[3]
J. Neumann,et al.
Theory of games and economic behavior
,
1945,
100 Years of Math Milestones.
[4]
Judea Pearl,et al.
Probabilistic reasoning in intelligent systems - networks of plausible inference
,
1991,
Morgan Kaufmann series in representation and reasoning.
[5]
F. Ramsey.
The Foundations of Mathematics and Other Logical Essays
,
2001
.
[6]
Jonathan Schaeffer,et al.
Opponent Modeling in Poker
,
1998,
AAAI/IAAI.
[7]
Judea Pearl,et al.
Probabilistic reasoning in intelligent systems
,
1988
.