Role of the superior colliculus in analyses of space: Superficial and intermediate layer contributions to visual orienting, auditory orienting, and visuospatial discriminations during unilateral and bilateral deactivations

The superior colliculus (SC) has been implicated in spatial analyses of the environment, although few behavioral studies have explicitly tested this role. To test its imputed role in spatial analyses, we used a battery of four spatial tasks combined with unilateral and bilateral cooling deactivation of the upper and intermediate layers of the superior colliculus. We tested the abilities of cats to orient to three different stimuli: (1) moving visual, (2) stationary visual, (3) stationary white‐noise aural. Furthermore, we tested the ability of the cats to discriminate the relative spatial position of a landmark. Unilateral cooling deactivation of the superficial layers of the SC induced a profound neglect of both moving and stationary visual stimuli presented in, and landmark objects located within, the contralateral hemifield. However, responses to auditory stimuli were unimpaired. Unilateral cooling deactivation of both the superficial and intermediate layers induced a profound contralateral neglect of the auditory stimulus. Additional and equivalent deactivation of the opposite SC largely restored orienting to either moving visual or auditory stimuli, and restored landmark position reporting to normal levels. However, during bilateral SC deactivation, orienting to the static visual stimulus was abolished throughout the entire visual field. Overall, unilateral SC deactivation results show that the upper and intermediate layers of the SC contribute in different ways to guiding behavioral responses to visual and auditory stimuli cues. Finally, bilateral superior colliculus deactivations reveal that other structures are sufficient to support spatial analyses and guide visual behaviors in the absence of neural operations in the superior colliculus, but only under certain circumstances. J. Comp. Neurol. 441:44–57, 2001. © 2001 Wiley‐Liss, Inc.

[1]  J. Apter,et al.  Eye movements following strychninization of the superior colliculus of cats. , 1946, Journal of neurophysiology.

[2]  W. R. Hess,et al.  Motorische Funktion des Tektal- und Tegmentalgebietes; pp. 1–26 , 1946 .

[3]  W. Chambers,et al.  Attentive, Affective, and Adaptive Behavior in the Cat , 1961, Science.

[4]  D. Hubel,et al.  Receptive fields, binocular interaction and functional architecture in the cat's visual cortex , 1962, The Journal of physiology.

[5]  C. A. Marsan.  Topographischer Hirnatlas der Katze für experimental-physiologische Untersuchungen , 1963 .

[6]  T H MEIKLE,et al.  THE ROLE OF THE SUPERIOR COLLICULUS IN VISUALLY GUIDED BEHAVIOR. , 1965, Experimental neurology.

[7]  J. Sprague,et al.  Interaction of Cortex and Superior Colliculus in Mediation of Visually Guided Behavior in the Cat , 1966, Science.

[8]  D. Hubel,et al.  Visual area of the lateral suprasylvian gyrus (Clare—Bishop area) of the cat , 1969, The Journal of physiology.

[9]  W. C. Hall,et al.  Superior Colliculus of the Tree Shrew: A Structural and Functional Subdivision into Superficial and Deep Layers , 1972, Science.

[10]  B E Stein,et al.  Unimodal and multimodal response properties of neurons in the cat's superior colliculus. , 1972, Experimental neurology.

[11]  M. Cynader,et al.  Comparison of receptive‐field organization of the superior colliculus in Siamese and normal cats , 1972, The Journal of physiology.

[12]  W. Pohl,et al.  Dissociation of spatial discrimination deficits following frontal and parietal lesions in monkeys. , 1973, Journal of comparative and physiological psychology.

[13]  V. Casagrande,et al.  Ablation study of the superior colliculus in the tree shrew (Tupaia glis) , 1974, The Journal of comparative neurology.

[14]  P. D. Spear,et al.  Receptive-field characteristics of single neurons in lateral suprasylvian visual area of the cat. , 1975, Journal of neurophysiology.

[15]  Ann M. Graybiel,et al.  Anatomical organization of retinotectal afferents in the cat: An autodiographic study , 1975, Brain Research.

[16]  J. K. Harting,et al.  Organization of retinocollicular pathways in the cat , 1976, The Journal of comparative neurology.

[17]  B E Stein,et al.  Relationship between visual and tactile representations in cat superior colliculus. , 1976, Journal of neurophysiology.

[18]  S. Sherman,et al.  The effect of superior colliculus lesions upon the visual fields of cats with cortical ablations , 1977, The Journal of comparative neurology.

[19]  F. Reinoso-suárez,et al.  Projections from non-visual cortical areas to the superior colliculus demonstrated by retrograde transport of HRP in the cat , 1980, Brain Research.

[20]  J. E. Tunkl.  Location of auditory and visual stimuli in cats with superior colliculus ablations , 1980, Experimental Neurology.

[21]  M. Mesulam.  A cortical network for directed attention and unilateral neglect , 1981, Annals of neurology.

[22]  J. K. Harting,et al.  Connectional organization of the superior colliculus , 1984, Trends in Neurosciences.

[23]  B. Stein,et al.  Topographic organization of somatosensory corticotectal influences in cat. , 1984, Journal of neurophysiology.

[24]  B. Stein,et al.  Multimodal Representation in the Superior Colliculus and Optic Tectum , 1984 .

[25]  M. Behan,et al.  An EM‐autoradiographic and EM‐HRP study of the commissural projection of the superior colliculus in the cat , 1985, The Journal of comparative neurology.

[26]  B. Stein,et al.  Visual, auditory, and somatosensory convergence on cells in superior colliculus results in multisensory integration. , 1986, Journal of neurophysiology.

[27]  J. Rauschecker,et al.  Centrifugal organization of direction preferences in the cat's lateral suprasylvian visual cortex and its relation to flow field processing , 1987, The Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience.

[28]  C. Blakemore,et al.  Spatial and temporal selectivity in the suprasylvian visual cortex of the cat , 1987, The Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience.

[29]  M. Kinsbourne.  Mechanisms of Unilateral Neglect , 1987 .

[30]  B E Stein,et al.  Small lateral suprasylvian cortex lesions produce visual neglect and decreased visual activity in the superior colliculus , 1988, The Journal of comparative neurology.

[31]  E. G. Keating,et al.  Saccadic disorders caused by cooling the superior colliculus or the frontal eye field, or from combined lesions of both structures , 1988, Brain Research.

[32]  D. Berson,et al.  Retinal and cortical inputs to cat superior colliculus: composition, convergence and laminar specificity. , 1988, Progress in brain research.

[33]  Lawrence G. McDade,et al.  Behavioral Indices of Multisensory Integration: Orientation to Visual Cues is Affected by Auditory Stimuli , 1989, Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience.

[34]  H. R. Clemo,et al.  Auditory cortical projection from the anterior ectosylvian sulcus (Field AES) to the superior colliculus in the cat: an anatomical and electrophysiological study. , 1989, The Journal of comparative neurology.

[35]  J A Movshon,et al.  Spatial and temporal analysis by neurons in the representation of the central visual field in the cat's lateral suprasylvian visual cortex , 1990, Visual Neuroscience.

[36]  G. Rizzolatti,et al.  Neglect as a neural representation deficit. , 1990, Revue neurologique.

[37]  C. K. Peck,et al.  Neuronal activity related to head and eye movements in cat superior colliculus. , 1990, The Journal of physiology.

[38]  B. V. Updyke,et al.  Corticotectal projections in the cat: Anterograde transport studies of twenty‐five cortical areas , 1992, The Journal of comparative neurology.

[39]  M. Behan,et al.  Intrinsic circuitry in the cat superior colliculus: Projections from the superficial layers , 1992, The Journal of comparative neurology.

[40]  M. Wallace,et al.  Converging influences from visual, auditory, and somatosensory cortices onto output neurons of the superior colliculus. , 1993, Journal of neurophysiology.

[41]  B. Payne,et al.  Differential sparing of depth perception, orienting, and optokinetic nystagmus after neonatal versus adult lesions of cortical areas 17, 18, and 19 in the cat. , 1993, Behavioral neuroscience.

[42]  S G Lomber,et al.  Reversible visual hemineglect. , 1996, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[43]  V. Ciaramitaro,et al.  Ibotenic acid lesions of the superior colliculus produce longer lasting deficits in visual orienting behavior than aspiration lesions in the cat. , 1996, Progress in brain research.

[44]  S G Lomber,et al.  Perceptual and cognitive visual functions of parietal and temporal cortices in the cat. , 1996, Cerebral cortex.

[45]  S G Lomber,et al.  Removal of two halves restores the whole: Reversal of visual hemineglect during bilateral cortical or collicular inactivation in the cat , 1996, Visual Neuroscience.

[46]  Stephen G. Lomber,et al.  The cryoloop: an adaptable reversible cooling deactivation method for behavioral or electrophysiological assessment of neural function , 1999, Journal of Neuroscience Methods.

[47]  M P Young,et al.  Inter-hemispheric competition of sub-cortical structures is a crucial mechanism in paradoxical lesion effects and spatial neglect. , 1999, Progress in brain research.

[48]  Bertram R Payne,et al.  A method to assess the functional impact of cerebral connections on target populations of neurons , 1999, Journal of Neuroscience Methods.

[49]  S G Lomber,et al.  Contributions of cat posterior parietal cortex to visuospatial discrimination , 2000, Visual Neuroscience.

[50]  B. Payne,et al.  Graded sparing of visually-guided orienting following primary visual cortex ablations within the first postnatal month , 2000, Behavioural Brain Research.

[51]  S G Lomber,et al.  Translaminar differentiation of visually guided behaviors revealed by restricted cerebral cooling deactivation. , 2000, Cerebral cortex.