Collaborative Consumption: Strategic and Economic Implications of Product Sharing

Recent technological advances in online and mobile communications have enabled collaborative consumption or product sharing among consumers on a massive scale. Collaborative consumption has emerged as a major trend as the global economic recession and social concerns about consumption sustainability lead consumers and society as a whole to explore more efficient use of resources and products. We develop an analytical framework to examine the strategic and economic impact of product sharing among consumers. A consumer who purchased a firm's product can derive different usage values across different usage periods. In a period with low self-use value, the consumer may generate some income by renting out her purchased product through a third-party sharing platform as long as the rental fee net of transaction costs exceeds her own self-use value. Our analysis shows that transaction costs in the sharing market have a nonmonotonic effect on the firm's profits, consumer surplus, and social welfare. We find that when the firm strategically chooses its retail price, consumers' sharing of products with high marginal costs is a win-win situation for the firm and the consumers, whereas their sharing of products with low marginal costs can be a lose-lose situation. Furthermore, in the presence of the sharing market, the firm will find it optimal to strategically increase its quality, leading to higher profits but lower consumer surplus. This paper was accepted by J. Miguel Villas-Boas, marketing.

[1]  Justin P. Johnson Secondary markets with changing preferences , 2011 .

[2]  Mikhael Shor,et al.  Social Sharing of Information Goods: Implications for Pricing and Profits , 2012, Mark. Sci..

[3]  Jeremy I. Bulow Durable-Goods Monopolists , 1982, Journal of Political Economy.

[4]  William R. Johnson,et al.  The Economics of Copying , 1985, Journal of Political Economy.

[5]  Richard Schmalensee,et al.  Gaussian Demand and Commodity Bundling , 1984 .

[6]  S. Rosen,et al.  Monopoly and product quality , 1978 .

[7]  Lisa N. Takeyama The Welfare Implications of Unauthorized Reproduction of Intellectual Property in the Presence of Demand Network Externalities , 1994 .

[8]  I. Hendel,et al.  Interfering with Secondary Markets , 1999 .

[9]  Michael Waldman,et al.  Eliminating the Market for Secondhand Goods: An Alternative Explanation for Leasing1 , 1997, The Journal of Law and Economics.

[10]  Drew Fudenberg,et al.  Upgrades, Tradeins, and Buybacks , 1998 .

[11]  Sanjay Jain,et al.  Digital Piracy: A Competitive Analysis , 2008, Mark. Sci..

[12]  Michael Waldman Durable Goods Theory for Real World Markets , 2003 .

[13]  Jeremy I. Bulow An Economic Theory of Planned Obsolescence , 1986 .

[14]  Mark E. Ferguson,et al.  Is Leasing Greener than Selling? , 2011, Manag. Sci..

[15]  A. Fishman,et al.  Product Innovation by a Durable-Good Monpoly , 2000 .

[16]  S. Huang,et al.  A Theory of Finitely Durable Goods Monopoly with Used-Goods Market and Transaction Costs , 2001, Manag. Sci..

[17]  Debabrata Dey,et al.  Effects of Piracy on Quality of Information Goods , 2013, Manag. Sci..

[18]  I. Hendel,et al.  The Role of Leasing under Adverse Selection , 1998, Journal of Political Economy.

[19]  Simon P. Anderson,et al.  Price discrimination via second-hand markets , 1994 .

[20]  Preyas S. Desai Leasing and Selling: Optimal Marketing Strategies for a Durable Goods Firm (Лизинг и продажи: оптимальные маркетинговые стратегии для изготовителя товаров длительного пользования) , 1998 .

[21]  Yannis Bakos,et al.  Shared Information Goods , 1999 .

[22]  Michael Waldman,et al.  The Effects of Increased Copyright Protection: An Analytic Approach , 1984, Journal of Political Economy.

[23]  John Rust,et al.  When Is It Optimal to Kill Off the Market for Used Durable Goods , 1986 .

[24]  J. Chevalier,et al.  Are Durable Goods Consumers Forward Looking? Evidence from College Textbooks , 2005 .

[25]  H. Varian Journal of Economic Perspectives. , 2004 .

[26]  Janet L. Yellen,et al.  Commodity Bundling and the Burden of Monopoly , 1976 .

[27]  S. Liebowitz Copying and Indirect Appropriability: Photocopying of Journals , 1985, Journal of Political Economy.

[28]  Yannis Bakos,et al.  Bundling Information Goods: Pricing, Profits and Efficiency , 1998 .

[29]  Preyas S. Desai,et al.  Competition in Durable Goods Markets: The Strategic Consequences of Leasing and Selling , 1999 .

[30]  M. Shum,et al.  When Do Secondary Markets Harm Firms , 2013 .

[31]  R. Coase Durability and Monopoly , 1972, The Journal of Law and Economics.

[32]  H. Miller,et al.  On Killing off the Market for Used Textbooks and the Relationship between Markets for New and Secondhand Goods , 1974, Journal of Political Economy.

[33]  Rachel Botsman,et al.  What's Mine Is Yours: The Rise of Collaborative Consumption , 2010 .

[34]  S. Besen,et al.  Private Copying, Appropriability, and Optimal Copying Royalties , 1989, The Journal of Law and Economics.

[35]  Michael Waldman Durable Goods Pricing When Quality Matters , 1996 .

[36]  Michael Waldman,et al.  Leasing, Lemons, and Buybacks , 2003 .

[37]  Michael Waldman,et al.  A New Perspective on Planned Obsolescence , 1993 .

[38]  Michael Waldman,et al.  Planned Obsolescence and the R & D Decision , 1996 .

[39]  A. Coughlan,et al.  Used goods, not used bads: Profitable secondary market sales for a durable goods channel , 2007 .

[40]  K. R. Conner,et al.  Software piracy: an analysis of protection strategies , 1991 .