Productive Failure

This study demonstrates an existence proof for productive failure: engaging students in solving complex, ill-structured problems without the provision of support structures can be a productive exercise in failure. In a computer-supported collaborative learning setting, eleventh-grade science students were randomly assigned to one of two conditions to solve problems in Newtonian kinematics. In one condition, students solved ill-structured problems in groups followed by well-structured problems individually. In the other condition, students solved well-structured problems in small groups followed by well-structured problems individually. Finally, all students solved ill-structured problems individually. Groups who solved ill-structured problems expectedly struggled with defining and analyzing the problems, resulting in poor quality of solutions. However, despite failing in their collaborative efforts, these students outperformed their counterparts in the well-structured condition on individual near- and far-transfer measures subsequently, suggesting a latent productivity in what initially seemed to be failure.

[1]  J. Doob.  Stochastic processes , 1953 .

[2]  Jacob Cohen.  Statistical Power Analysis for the Behavioral Sciences , 1969, The SAGE Encyclopedia of Research Design.

[3]  W. R. Garner.  The Processing of Information and Structure , 1974 .

[4]  J. Bruner,et al.  The role of tutoring in problem solving. , 1976, Journal of child psychology and psychiatry, and allied disciplines.

[5]  A. N. Leont’ev,et al.  Activity, consciousness, and personality , 1978 .

[6]  James F. Kavanagh,et al.  Speech and language in the laboratory, school, and clinic , 1978 .

[7]  Paul J. Feltovich,et al.  Categorization and Representation of Physics Problems by Experts and Novices , 1981, Cogn. Sci..

[8]  Sheldon M. Ross,et al.  Stochastic Processes , 2018, Gauge Integral Structures for Stochastic Calculus and Quantum Electrodynamics.

[9]  G. Hatano,et al.  TWO COURSES OF EXPERTISE , 1984 .

[10]  Roger Bakeman,et al.  Observing Interaction: An Introduction to Sequential Analysis , 1986 .

[11]  K. Hakuta,et al.  Child development and education in Japan. , 1986 .

[12]  Rand J. Spiro,et al.  Cognitive flexibility theory : advanced knowledge acquisition in ill-structured domains , 1988 .

[13]  John Sweller,et al.  Cognitive Load During Problem Solving: Effects on Learning , 1988, Cogn. Sci..

[14]  A. Collins,et al.  Situated Cognition and the Culture of Learning , 1989 .

[15]  J. Levin,et al.  Single-case research design and analysis : new directions for psychology and education , 1992 .

[16]  Vinod Goel,et al.  The Structure of Design Problem Spaces , 1992, Cogn. Sci..

[17]  J. Roschelle.  Learning by Collaborating: Convergent Conceptual Change , 1992 .

[18]  John Archibald Wheeler,et al.  At Home in the Universe , 1994 .

[19]  Marshall Scott Poole,et al.  Decision Development in Computer-Assisted Group Decision Making , 1995 .

[20]  W. Kintsch,et al.  Are Good Texts Always Better? Interactions of Text Coherence, Background Knowledge, and Levels of Understanding in Learning From Text , 1996 .

[21]  Timothy Koschmann,et al.  Cscl : Theory and Practice of An Emerging Paradigm , 1996 .

[22]  M. Chi.  Quantifying Qualitative Analyses of Verbal Data: A Practical Guide , 1997 .

[23]  Yaneer Bar-Yam,et al.  Dynamics Of Complex Systems , 2019 .

[24]  Simon S. K. Lam,et al.  The Effects of Group Decision Support Systems and Task Structures on Group Communication and Decision Quality , 1997, J. Manag. Inf. Syst..

[25]  Daniel L. Schwartz,et al.  A time for telling , 1998 .

[26]  Xiaodong Lin,et al.  Designing technology to support reflection , 1999 .

[27]  Kurt VanLehn,et al.  Rule-Learning Events in the Acquisition of a Complex Skill: An Evaluation of Cascade , 1999 .

[28]  David H. Jonassen,et al.  Toward a design theory of problem solving , 2000 .

[29]  D. McNamara.  Reading both high-coherence and low-coherence texts: effects of text sequence and prior knowledge. , 2001, Canadian journal of experimental psychology = Revue canadienne de psychologie experimentale.

[30]  D. Jonassen,et al.  Communication patterns in computer mediated versus face-to-face group problem solving , 2001 .

[31]  David H. Jonassen,et al.  The effects of argumentation scaffolds on argumentation and problem solving , 2002 .

[32]  Gijsbert Erkens,et al.  Computer Support for Collaborative and Argumentative Writing , 2002 .

[33]  Rachel A. Lotan,et al.  Can Groups Learn , 2002 .

[34]  Joshua M. Epstein,et al.  Growing Artificial Societies: Social Science from the Bottom Up , 1996 .

[35]  Brigid Barron.  When Smart Groups Fail , 2003 .

[36]  Susan M. Land,et al.  Scaffolding students’ problem-solving processes in an ill-structured task using question prompts and peer interactions , 2003 .

[37]  Daniel D. Suthers,et al.  An Experimental Study of the Effects of Representational Guidance on Collaborative Learning Processes , 2003 .

[38]  R. Gonzalez.  Applied Multivariate Statistics for the Social Sciences , 2003 .

[39]  K. VanLehn,et al.  Why Do Only Some Events Cause Learning During Human Tutoring? , 2003 .

[40]  Daniel D. Suthers,et al.  An Empirical Study of the Effects of Representational Guidance on Collaborative Learning. , 2003 .

[41]  R. Pea,et al.  The Social and Technological Dimensions of Scaffolding and Related Theoretical Concepts for Learning, Education, and Human Activity , 2004, The Journal of the Learning Sciences.

[42]  Daniel L. Schwartz,et al.  Inventing to Prepare for Future Learning: The Hidden Efficiency of Encouraging Original Student Production in Statistics Instruction , 2004 .

[43]  Brian J. Reiser,et al.  Scaffolding Complex Learning: The Mechanisms of Structuring and Problematizing Student Work , 2004, The Journal of the Learning Sciences.

[44]  K. Merrell,et al.  Book Review: Designing and using tools for educational assessment , 2004 .

[45]  Manu Kapur,et al.  Problem solving as a complex, evolutionary activity: a methodological framework for analyzing problem-solving processes in a computer-supported collaborative environment , 2005, CSCL.

[46]  Michelene T. H. Chi,et al.  Commonsense Conceptions of Emergent Processes: Why Some Misconceptions Are Robust , 2005 .

[47]  Gerry Stahl,et al.  Group cognition in computer-assisted collaborative learning , 2005, J. Comput. Assist. Learn..

[48]  Nikol Rummel,et al.  A new method to assess the quality of collaborative process in CSCL , 2005, CSCL.

[49]  M. Cole,et al.  Mind in society: The development of higher psychological processes. L. S. Vygotsky. , 1978 .

[50]  J. Gill.  Hierarchical Linear Models , 2005 .

[51]  Tammy Schellens,et al.  The impact of role assignment as scripting tool on knowledge construction in asynchronous discussion groups , 2005, CSCL.

[52]  J. Mestre.  Transfer of learning from a modern multidisciplinary perspective , 2005 .

[53]  J. F. Voss.  Toulmin’s Model and the Solving of Ill-Structured Problems , 2005 .

[54]  Daniel L. Schwartz,et al.  EFFICIENCY AND INNOVATION IN TRANSFER , 2005 .

[55]  Manu Kapur,et al.  The effect of problem type on collaborative problem solving in a synchronous computer-mediated environment; American Educational Research Association , 2005 .

[56]  Robert L. Goldstone,et al.  Computational models of collective behavior , 2005, Trends in Cognitive Sciences.

[57]  Heinz Mandl,et al.  Knowledge Convergence in Computer-Supported Collaborative Learning: The Role of External Representation Tools , 2005 .

[58]  U. Wilensky,et al.  Complex Systems in Education: Scientific and Educational Importance and Implications for the Learning Sciences , 2006 .

[59]  Daniel D. Suthers,et al.  Technology affordances for intersubjective meaning making: A research agenda for CSCL , 2006, Int. J. Comput. Support. Collab. Learn..

[60]  A. Sen,et al.  The argumentative Indian : writings on Indian history, culture and identity , 2006 .

[61]  Katerine Bielaczyc,et al.  Designing Social Infrastructure: Critical Issues in Creating Learning Environments With Technology , 2006 .

[62]  Ference Marton,et al.  Sameness and Difference in Transfer , 2006 .

[63]  Robert L. Goldstone.  The Complex Systems See-Change in Education , 2006 .

[64]  Richard E. Clark,et al.  Why Minimal Guidance During Instruction Does Not Work: An Analysis of the Failure of Constructivist, Discovery, Problem-Based, Experiential, and Inquiry-Based Teaching , 2006 .

[65]  Manu Kapur,et al.  Sensitivities to early exchange in synchronous computer-supported collaborative learning (CSCL) groups , 2007, Comput. Educ..

[66]  Manu Kapur,et al.  Examining the effect of problem type in a synchronous computer-supported collaborative learning (CSCL) environment , 2007 .

[67]  Tammy Schellens,et al.  Learning in asynchronous discussion groups: a multilevel approach to study the influence of student, group and task characteristics , 2007, Behav. Inf. Technol..