4 Wavelet Denoising for Image Enhancement

Image processing is a science that uncovers information about images. Enhancement of an image is necessary to improve appearance or to highlight some aspect of the information contained in the image. Whenever an image is converted from one form to another, e.g., acquired, copied, scanned, digitized, transmitted, displayed, printed, or compressed, many types of noise or noiselike degradations can be present in the image. For instance, when an analog image is digitized, the resulting digital image contains quantization noise; when an image is halftoned for printing, the resulting binary image contains halftoning noise; when an image is transmitted through a communication channel, the received image contains channel noise; when an image is compressed, the decompressed image contains compression errors. Hence, an important subject is the development of image enhancement algorithms that remove (smooth) noise artifacts while retaining image structure. Digital images can be conveniently represented and manipulated as matrices containing the light intensity or color information at each spatially sampled points. The term monochrome digital image or simply digital image, refers to a two-dimensional light intensity function f(n1, n2), where n1 and n2 denote spatial coordinates, the value of f(n1, n2) is proportional to the brightness (or gray level) of the image at that point, and n1, n2, and f(n1, n2) are integers. The problem of image denoising is to recover an image f(n1, n2) from the observation g(n1, n2), which is distorted by noise (or noise-like degradation) q(n1, n2); i.e.,

[1]  Norman Weyrich,et al.  Wavelet shrinkage and generalized cross validation for image denoising , 1998, IEEE Trans. Image Process..

[2]  L D Cromwell,et al.  Filtering noise from images with wavelet transforms , 1991, Magnetic resonance in medicine.

[3]  D. L. Donoho,et al.  Ideal spacial adaptation via wavelet shrinkage , 1994 .

[4]  Dirk Roose,et al.  Wavelet-based image denoising using a Markov random field a priori model , 1997, IEEE Trans. Image Process..

[5]  Kannan Ramchandran,et al.  Low-complexity image denoising based on statistical modeling of wavelet coefficients , 1999, IEEE Signal Processing Letters.

[6]  Ramesh A. Gopinath,et al.  Wavelet-based post-processing of low bit rate transform coded images , 1994, Proceedings of 1st International Conference on Image Processing.

[7]  D. Donoho Unconditional Bases Are Optimal Bases for Data Compression and for Statistical Estimation , 1993 .

[8]  G. A Theory for Multiresolution Signal Decomposition : The Wavelet Representation , 2004 .

[9]  J. H. Hateren,et al.  Independent component filters of natural images compared with simple cells in primary visual cortex , 1998 .

[10]  D. Donoho,et al.  Translation-Invariant De-Noising , 1995 .

[11]  Dong Wei,et al.  Optimal wavelet thresholding for various coding schemes , 1995, Proceedings., International Conference on Image Processing.

[12]  Antonin Chambolle,et al.  Nonlinear wavelet image processing: variational problems, compression, and noise removal through wavelet shrinkage , 1998, IEEE Trans. Image Process..

[13]  Martin Vetterli,et al.  Spatially adaptive wavelet thresholding with context modeling for image denoising , 1998, Proceedings 1998 International Conference on Image Processing. ICIP98 (Cat. No.98CB36269).

[14]  Martin J. Wainwright,et al.  Image denoising using scale mixtures of Gaussians in the wavelet domain , 2003, IEEE Trans. Image Process..

[15]  I. Johnstone,et al.  Adapting to Unknown Smoothness via Wavelet Shrinkage , 1995 .

[16]  Martin J. Wainwright,et al.  Scale Mixtures of Gaussians and the Statistics of Natural Images , 1999, NIPS.

[17]  Stéphane Mallat,et al.  A Theory for Multiresolution Signal Decomposition: The Wavelet Representation , 1989, IEEE Trans. Pattern Anal. Mach. Intell..

[18]  Eero P. Simoncelli,et al.  Natural image statistics and neural representation. , 2001, Annual review of neuroscience.

[19]  Michael T. Orchard,et al.  A deblocking algorithm for JPEG compressed images using overcomplete wavelet representations , 1997, IEEE Trans. Circuits Syst. Video Technol..

[20]  Martin J. Wainwright,et al.  Adaptive Wiener denoising using a Gaussian scale mixture model in the wavelet domain , 2001, Proceedings 2001 International Conference on Image Processing (Cat. No.01CH37205).

[21]  M. L. Hilton,et al.  Data analytic wavelet threshold selection in 2-D signal denoising , 1997, IEEE Trans. Signal Process..

[22]  C.-C. Jay Kuo,et al.  Review of Postprocessing Techniques for Compression Artifact Removal , 1998, J. Vis. Commun. Image Represent..

[23]  Eero P. Simoncelli,et al.  Image denoising using a local Gaussian scale mixture model in the wavelet domain , 2000, SPIE Optics + Photonics.

[24]  David L. Donoho,et al.  De-noising by soft-thresholding , 1995, IEEE Trans. Inf. Theory.

[25]  Dennis M. Healy,et al.  Wavelet transform domain filters: a spatially selective noise filtration technique , 1994, IEEE Trans. Image Process..

[26]  Pierre Moulin A wavelet regularization method for diffuse radar-target imaging and speckle-noise reduction , 2005, Journal of Mathematical Imaging and Vision.

[27]  C. Burrus,et al.  Noise reduction using an undecimated discrete wavelet transform , 1996, IEEE Signal Processing Letters.

[28]  I. Daubechies Ten Lectures on Wavelets , 1992 .

[29]  Dong Wei,et al.  Enhancement of Compressed Images by Optimal Shift-Invariant Wavelet Packet Basis , 1998, J. Vis. Commun. Image Represent..

[30]  Leslie S. Smith,et al.  The principal components of natural images , 1992 .

[31]  Eero P. Simoncelli Statistical models for images: compression, restoration and synthesis , 1997, Conference Record of the Thirty-First Asilomar Conference on Signals, Systems and Computers (Cat. No.97CB36136).