Optimal configurations of spatial scale for grid cell firing under noise and uncertainty

We examined the accuracy with which the location of an agent moving within an environment could be decoded from the simulated firing of systems of grid cells. Grid cells were modelled with Poisson spiking dynamics and organized into multiple ‘modules’ of cells, with firing patterns of similar spatial scale within modules and a wide range of spatial scales across modules. The number of grid cells per module, the spatial scaling factor between modules and the size of the environment were varied. Errors in decoded location can take two forms: small errors of precision and larger errors resulting from ambiguity in decoding periodic firing patterns. With enough cells per module (e.g. eight modules of 100 cells each) grid systems are highly robust to ambiguity errors, even over ranges much larger than the largest grid scale (e.g. over a 500 m range when the maximum grid scale is 264 cm). Results did not depend strongly on the precise organization of scales across modules (geometric, co-prime or random). However, independent spatial noise across modules, which would occur if modules receive independent spatial inputs and might increase with spatial uncertainty, dramatically degrades the performance of the grid system. This effect of spatial uncertainty can be mitigated by uniform expansion of grid scales. Thus, in the realistic regimes simulated here, the optimal overall scale for a grid system represents a trade-off between minimizing spatial uncertainty (requiring large scales) and maximizing precision (requiring small scales). Within this view, the temporary expansion of grid scales observed in novel environments may be an optimal response to increased spatial uncertainty induced by the unfamiliarity of the available spatial cues.

[1]  J. O’Keefe,et al.  Boundary Vector Cells in the Subiculum of the Hippocampal Formation , 2009, The Journal of Neuroscience.

[2]  J. O’Keefe,et al.  Geometric determinants of the place fields of hippocampal neurons , 1996, Nature.

[3]  James G. Heys,et al.  Possible role of acetylcholine in regulating spatial novelty effects on theta rhythm and grid cells , 2012, Front. Neural Circuits.

[4]  J. O’Keefe,et al.  An oscillatory interference model of grid cell firing , 2007, Hippocampus.

[5]  N. Burgess Grid cells and theta as oscillatory interference: Theory and predictions , 2008, Hippocampus.

[6]  May-Britt Moser,et al.  The entorhinal grid map is discretized , 2012, Nature.

[7]  K. Jeffery,et al.  Experience-dependent rescaling of entorhinal grids , 2007, Nature Neuroscience.

[8]  A. Treves,et al.  Hippocampal remapping and grid realignment in entorhinal cortex , 2007, Nature.

[9]  T. Hafting,et al.  Microstructure of a spatial map in the entorhinal cortex , 2005, Nature.

[10]  J. Diamond A sense of place , 1997, Nature.

[11]  Martin Stemmler,et al.  Optimal Population Codes for Space: Grid Cells Outperform Place Cells , 2012, Neural Computation.

[12]  M. Hasselmo Grid cell mechanisms and function: Contributions of entorhinal persistent spiking and phase resetting , 2008, Hippocampus.

[13]  J. O’Keefe Place units in the hippocampus of the freely moving rat , 1976, Experimental Neurology.

[14]  J. Prentice,et al.  A principle of economy predicts the functional architecture of grid cells , 2013, eLife.

[15]  K. Jeffery,et al.  The Boundary Vector Cell Model of Place Cell Firing and Spatial Memory , 2006, Reviews in the neurosciences.

[16]  Ila Fiete,et al.  Grid cells generate an analog error-correcting code for singularly precise neural computation , 2011, Nature Neuroscience.

[17]  J. O'Keefe,et al.  The hippocampus as a spatial map. Preliminary evidence from unit activity in the freely-moving rat. , 1971, Brain research.

[18]  M. Fyhn,et al.  Progressive increase in grid scale from dorsal to ventral medial entorhinal cortex , 2008, Hippocampus.

[19]  Ila R Fiete,et al.  What Grid Cells Convey about Rat Location , 2008, The Journal of Neuroscience.

[20]  J. O’Keefe,et al.  Grid cell firing patterns signal environmental novelty by expansion , 2012, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[21]  H. T. Blair,et al.  Conversion of a phase‐ to a rate‐coded position signal by a three‐stage model of theta cells, grid cells, and place cells , 2008, Hippocampus.

[22]  M. Stemmler,et al.  Multiscale codes in the nervous system: the problem of noise correlations and the ambiguity of periodic scales. , 2013, Physical review. E, Statistical, nonlinear, and soft matter physics.

[23]  Angela J. Yu,et al.  Uncertainty, Neuromodulation, and Attention , 2005, Neuron.

[24]  M. Hasselmo The role of acetylcholine in learning and memory , 2006, Current Opinion in Neurobiology.

[25]  C. Barry,et al.  Specific evidence of low-dimensional continuous attractor dynamics in grid cells , 2013, Nature Neuroscience.

[26]  Lisa M. Giocomo,et al.  Cholinergic modulation of the resonance properties of stellate cells in layer II of medial entorhinal cortex. , 2010, Journal of neurophysiology.

[27]  Emilio Salinas,et al.  Vector reconstruction from firing rates , 1994, Journal of Computational Neuroscience.

[28]  Stephen Grossberg,et al.  Space, time and learning in the hippocampus: How fine spatial and temporal scales are expanded into population codes for behavioral control , 2007, Neural Networks.

[29]  J. Prentice,et al.  The Sense of Place: Grid Cells in the Brain and the Transcendental Number e , 2013, 1304.0031.

[30]  Matthias Bethge,et al.  Optimal Short-Term Population Coding: When Fisher Information Fails , 2002, Neural Computation.