Regional Brain Activation Evoked When Approaching a Virtual Human on a Virtual Walk

We investigated the necessity of biological motion for activation of the posterior superior temporal sulcus (pSTS) in circumstances in which the rapid approach of the observer to a virtual human induced the observer to make inferences about the characters intentions. Using a virtual reality environment, subjects experienced themselves walking towards a complex scene composed of animate and/or inanimate objects. During person trials, the scene contained a virtual human either making a simple gesture such as scratching his face (Study 1) or standing completely still (Study 2). During object trials, the scenes contained items such as furniture, a face portrait, and a clock, but not the virtual human. Using functional MRI to measure brain activity, we demonstrated strong activity in the pSTS while the observer approached the social scene, but only when the virtual human was making gestures. This result emphasizes the importance of biological motion in inferring the intentions of others.

[1]  C. Frith,et al.  Dissociable neural pathways for the perception and recognition of expressive and instrumental gestures , 2004, Neuropsychologia.

[2]  T. Allison,et al.  Social perception from visual cues: role of the STS region , 2000, Trends in Cognitive Sciences.

[3]  R. E Passingham,et al.  Inferring false beliefs from the actions of oneself and others: an fMRI study , 2004, NeuroImage.

[4]  G. Rizzolatti,et al.  Action observation activates premotor and parietal areas in a somatotopic manner: an fMRI study , 2001, The European journal of neuroscience.

[5]  T. Allison,et al.  Brain activation evoked by perception of gaze shifts: the influence of context , 2003, Neuropsychologia.

[6]  C. Frith,et al.  Movement and Mind: A Functional Imaging Study of Perception and Interpretation of Complex Intentional Movement Patterns , 2000, NeuroImage.

[7]  T. Allison,et al.  Face-Specific Processing in the Human Fusiform Gyrus , 1997, Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience.

[8]  T. Allison,et al.  Electrophysiological studies of human face perception. II: Response properties of face-specific potentials generated in occipitotemporal cortex. , 1999, Cerebral cortex.

[9]  D. Perrett,et al.  A region of right posterior superior temporal sulcus responds to observed intentional actions , 2004, Neuropsychologia.

[10]  Beatriz Luna,et al.  Combining Brains: A Survey of Methods for Statistical Pooling of Information , 2002, NeuroImage.

[11]  J. Haxby,et al.  Parallel Visual Motion Processing Streams for Manipulable Objects and Human Movements , 2002, Neuron.

[12]  T. Allison,et al.  Brain Activity Evoked by the Perception of Human Walking: Controlling for Meaningful Coherent Motion , 2003, The Journal of Neuroscience.

[13]  R. Blake,et al.  Brain activity evoked by inverted and imagined biological motion , 2001, Vision Research.

[14]  N. Kanwisher,et al.  The fusiform face area subserves face perception, not generic within-category identification , 2004, Nature Neuroscience.

[15]  T. Allison,et al.  Electrophysiological studies of human face perception. I: Potentials generated in occipitotemporal cortex by face and non-face stimuli. , 1999, Cerebral cortex.

[16]  P. Skudlarski,et al.  The role of the fusiform face area in social cognition: implications for the pathobiology of autism. , 2003, Philosophical transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Biological sciences.

[18]  P. Downing,et al.  Selectivity for the human body in the fusiform gyrus. , 2005, Journal of neurophysiology.

[19]  Alan C. Evans,et al.  Specific Involvement of Human Parietal Systems and the Amygdala in the Perception of Biological Motion , 1996, The Journal of Neuroscience.

[20]  J. Decety,et al.  Neural mechanisms subserving the perception of human actions , 1999, Trends in Cognitive Sciences.

[21]  Kevin A. Pelphrey,et al.  Grasping the Intentions of Others: The Perceived Intentionality of an Action Influences Activity in the Superior Temporal Sulcus during Social Perception , 2004, Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience.

[22]  N. Kanwisher,et al.  The Fusiform Face Area: A Module in Human Extrastriate Cortex Specialized for Face Perception , 1997, The Journal of Neuroscience.

[23]  HighWire Press Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society of London , 1781, The London Medical Journal.

[24]  N. Kanwisher,et al.  The Human Body , 2001 .

[25]  A. Cowey,et al.  Regional cerebral correlates of global motion perception: evidence from unilateral cerebral brain damage. , 2001, Brain : a journal of neurology.

[26]  G. Glover,et al.  Spiral‐in/out BOLD fMRI for increased SNR and reduced susceptibility artifacts , 2001, Magnetic resonance in medicine.

[27]  R. Blake,et al.  Perception of human motion. , 2007, Annual review of psychology.

[28]  T. Allison,et al.  Face-sensitive regions in human extrastriate cortex studied by functional MRI. , 1995, Journal of neurophysiology.

[29]  T. Allison,et al.  Face recognition in human extrastriate cortex. , 1994, Journal of neurophysiology.

[30]  Hua Guo,et al.  Single‐shot spiral image acquisition with embedded z‐shimming for susceptibility signal recovery , 2003, Journal of magnetic resonance imaging : JMRI.

[31]  T. Allison,et al.  Electrophysiological studies of human face perception. III: Effects of top-down processing on face-specific potentials. , 1999, Cerebral cortex.

[32]  Ewald Moser,et al.  Amygdala activation at 3T in response to human and avatar facial expressions of emotions , 2007, Journal of Neuroscience Methods.

[33]  Matthew D. Lieberman,et al.  Reflexion and reflection: A social cognitive neuroscience approach to attributional inference , 2002 .

[34]  C. Frith,et al.  Development and neurophysiology of mentalizing. , 2003, Philosophical transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Biological sciences.

[35]  G. McCarthy,et al.  When Strangers Pass , 2004, Psychological science.

[36]  J. Mazziotta,et al.  Cortical mechanisms of human imitation. , 1999, Science.