Methane gas leak quantification employing infrared sensing at suspected leak sites

We present a conceptual design for an in-situ methane gas sensor that could be deployed rapidly to suspected sites of spurious methane emission. Based on the remote detection of suspected methane leaks now possible with a class of satellites currently in orbit or soon to be launched, in-situ sensors would be deployed to the location of the detection, and accurate measurements of methane leak rates would be reported. Our design is very high level at this time, but incorporates a spectral capability that allows switching on and off the wavelengths of peak methane emission to facilitate detection. Unlike the case for the satellite-based sensing of the gas, our design will lead to the quantification of smallest levels of methane leaks. Two approaches will be considered: ground sensors detecting methane in emission against a cooler sky background, and aerial sensors detecting the gas in absorption against the ground scene as a background source. Sensitivity plays a key role, with the infrared detector working in the 2.4-micron region and operating with near-theoretical sensitivity, with the limiting noise sources set by the background levels for the ground sensor. Consideration of levels of detector dark current, based on the background signal level, and required detector operation temperatures will be derived. The paper reports on the conceptual design, with details on the electronics approach needed to realize the needed levels of sensitivity. Performance quantification will be accomplished through simulation using accurate noise models.

[1]  W. E. Tennant,et al.  “Rule 07” Revisited: Still a Good Heuristic Predictor of p/n HgCdTe Photodiode Performance? , 2010 .

[2]  M. Carmody,et al.  High-Operating Temperature HgCdTe: A Vision for the Near Future , 2016, Journal of Electronic Materials.

[3]  W. Marsden I and J , 2012 .

[4]  NASA Ames Research Center,et al.  The Mauna Kea Observatories Near-Infrared Filter Set. III. Isophotal Wavelengths and Absolute Calibration , 2005 .

[5]  Patrick Hostert,et al.  The EnMAP Spaceborne Imaging Spectroscopy Mission for Earth Observation , 2015, Remote. Sens..

[6]  J. Sheng,et al.  Satellite observations of atmospheric methane and their value for quantifying methane emissions , 2016 .

[7]  王淑美,et al.  Turner综合征三例 , 1987 .

[8]  Rainer Breiter,et al.  Improved high performance MCT MWIR and LWIR modules , 2019, Defense + Commercial Sensing.

[9]  Rocchina Guarini,et al.  Prisma: The Italian Hyperspectral Mission , 2018, IGARSS 2018 - 2018 IEEE International Geoscience and Remote Sensing Symposium.

[10]  David R. Thompson,et al.  Potential of next-generation imaging spectrometers to detect and quantify methane point sources from space , 2019, Atmospheric Measurement Techniques.

[11]  Alexander Soibel,et al.  The emergence of InAs/InAsSb type-II strained layer superlattice barrier infrared detectors , 2019, Defense + Commercial Sensing.

[12]  R. Kennett,et al.  MODTRAN® 6: A major upgrade of the MODTRAN® radiative transfer code , 2014, 2014 6th Workshop on Hyperspectral Image and Signal Processing: Evolution in Remote Sensing (WHISPERS).

[13]  David R. Thompson,et al.  The Airborne Methane Plume Spectrometer (AMPS): Quantitative imaging of methane plumes in real time , 2016, 2016 IEEE Aerospace Conference.

[14]  J. Scott Tyo,et al.  Spectrally adaptive infrared photodetectors with bias-tunable quantum dots , 2004 .

[15]  Paul D. LeVan,et al.  Infrared sensing technologies assisting environmental monitoring , 2020, Optical Engineering + Applications.

[16]  Sanjay Krishna,et al.  Statistical adaptive sensing by detectors with spectrally overlapping bands. , 2006, Applied optics.

[17]  A. T. Tokunaga,et al.  The Mauna Kea Observatories Near‐Infrared Filter Set. I. Defining Optimal 1–5 Micron Bandpasses , 2002 .

[18]  Zhipeng Wang,et al.  Quantum dot detectors for mid-infrared sensing: bias-controlled spectral tuning and matched filtering , 2004, SPIE Optics East.