Learning-dependent timing of Pavlovian eyelid responses: differential conditioning using multiple interstimulus intervals.

This study demonstrates that individual animals can concurrently acquire differently timed conditioned eyelid responses using a differential conditioning procedure in which distinctive conditioned stimuli (CSs) are individually paired with an unconditioned stimulus, with each using a different interstimulus interval (ISI). This promotes robust conditioning, and the timing of the conditioned responses is appropriate for the respective ISIs, differs for each CS to the extent that the ISIs are dissimilar, and is apparent in individual trials. This procedure was used to demonstrate that response timing is not a function of associative strength. These data suggest response timing is mediated by an ability to make temporal discriminations during the CS. The within-animals comparisons made possible by this differential conditioning should facilitate lesion and unit recording analyses of the neural basis of response timing.

[1]  J. R. Millenson,et al.  Classical conditioning of the rabbit's nictitating membrane response under fixed and mixed CS-US intervals , 1977 .

[2]  D J Rosen,et al.  Classical conditioning of the rabbit eyelid response with a mossy-fiber stimulation CS: I. Pontine nuclei and middle cerebellar peduncle stimulation. , 1986, Behavioral neuroscience.

[3]  Richard F. Thompson The neurobiology of learning and memory. , 1986, Science.

[4]  M. M. Patterson,et al.  Differential effects of hippocampectomy on classically conditioned rabbit nictitating membrane response related to interstimulus interval. , 1985, Behavioral neuroscience.

[5]  N. Schneiderman Interstimulus interval function of the nictitating membrane response of the rabbit under delay versus trace conditioning. , 1966 .

[6]  E. Kehoe,et al.  Temporal patterns of the rabbit's nictitating membrane response to compound and component stimuli under mixed CS-US intervals. , 1989, Behavioral neuroscience.

[7]  Theodore W. Berger,et al.  Hippocampal substrate of classical conditioning , 1980 .

[8]  I. Gormezano,et al.  CONDITIONING OF THE NICTITATING MEMBRANE OF THE RABBIT AS A FUNCTION OF CS-US INTERVAL. , 1964, Journal of comparative and physiological psychology.

[9]  N. Donegan,et al.  Conditioned diminution and facilitation of the UR: A sometimes opponent-process interpretation. , 1987 .

[10]  Masao Ito The Cerebellum And Neural Control , 1984 .

[11]  Ralph R. Miller,et al.  Information processing in animals : memory mechanisms , 1983 .

[12]  R. F. Thompson,et al.  Initial localization of the acoustic conditioned stimulus projection system to the cerebellum essential for classical eyelid conditioning. , 1987, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[13]  R. F. Thompson,et al.  Neuronal substrate of classical conditioning in the hippocampus , 1976, Science.

[14]  J. Theios,et al.  Acquisition and extinction of a classically conditioned response in hippocampectomized rabbits (Oryctolagus cuniculus). , 1972, Journal of comparative and physiological psychology.

[15]  B. Skinner,et al.  Principles of Behavior , 1944 .

[16]  Daniel L. Alkon,et al.  Cellular Mechanisms of Conditioning and Behavioral Plasticity , 1988, Springer US.

[17]  J. Albus A Theory of Cerebellar Function , 1971 .

[18]  Professor Dr. John C. Eccles,et al.  The Cerebellum as a Neuronal Machine , 1967, Springer Berlin Heidelberg.

[19]  S. R. Coleman,et al.  Classical conditioning of the rabbit's nictitating membrane response at backward, simultaneous, and forward CS-US intervals. , 1969, Journal of comparative and physiological psychology.

[20]  Richard F. Thompson,et al.  Neuronal plasticity recorded from cat hippocampus during classical conditioning , 1979, Brain Research.

[21]  R. F. Thompson,et al.  Classical conditioning using stimulation of the inferior olive as the unconditioned stimulus. , 1986, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[22]  M. M. Patterson,et al.  Retention and acquisition of classical trace conditioned responses by rabbits with hippocampal lesions. , 1986, Behavioral neuroscience.

[23]  R. Sutton,et al.  Simulation of the classically conditioned nictitating membrane response by a neuron-like adaptive element: Response topography, neuronal firing, and interstimulus intervals , 1986, Behavioural Brain Research.

[24]  R. Rescorla,et al.  A theory of Pavlovian conditioning : Variations in the effectiveness of reinforcement and nonreinforcement , 1972 .

[25]  J. Welsh,et al.  Cerebellar lesions and the nictitating membrane reflex: performance deficits of the conditioned and unconditioned response , 1989, The Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience.

[26]  J. Steinmetz Classical nictitating membrane conditioning in rabbits with varying interstimulus intervals and direct activation of cerebellar mossy fibers as the CS , 1990, Behavioural Brain Research.

[27]  Richard F. Thompson,et al.  Lesions of the inferior olivary complex cause extinction of the classically conditioned eyeblink response , 1985, Brain Research.

[28]  G. A. Clark,et al.  Learning-dependent neuronal responses recorded from limbic system brain structures during classical conditioning , 1980 .

[29]  C. L. Hull,et al.  A Behavior System , 1954 .

[30]  Efficiency of the Conditioned Eyelid Response , 1965, Science.

[31]  R. F. Thompson,et al.  Cerebellum: essential involvement in the classically conditioned eyelid response. , 1984, Science.

[32]  M. Glickstein,et al.  The Cerebellum and Motor Learning , 1990, Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience.

[33]  W. R. Salafia,et al.  Rabbit nictitating membrane conditioning: Lower limit of the effective interstimulus interval , 1980 .

[34]  D. Marr A theory of cerebellar cortex , 1969, The Journal of physiology.

[35]  Ralph R. Miller,et al.  Information processing in animals : conditioned inhibition , 1985 .

[36]  S. R. Coleman,et al.  Classical conditioning of the rabbit's (Oryctolagus cuniculus) nictitating membrane response under symmetrical CS-US interval shifts. , 1971, Journal of comparative and physiological psychology.

[37]  John H. Byrne,et al.  Neural Models of Plasticity: Experimental and Theoretical Approaches , 1989 .

[38]  M. C. Smith,et al.  CS-US interval and US intensity in classical conditioning of the rabbit's nictitating membrane response. , 1968, Journal of comparative and physiological psychology.

[39]  M. Mauk,et al.  Cerebellar cortex lesions disrupt learning-dependent timing of conditioned eyelid responses , 1993, The Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience.

[40]  D. Alkon,et al.  Hippocampal lesions impair memory of short-delay conditioned eye blink in rabbits. , 1989, Behavioral neuroscience.

[41]  J. Falk Physiology and Behavior. , 1973 .

[42]  JOHN W. Moore,et al.  Simulation of a Classically Conditioned Response: A Cerebellar Neural Network Implementation of the Sutton–Barto–Desmond Model , 1989 .

[43]  P. Solomon,et al.  Latent inhibition and stimulus generalization of the classically conditioned nictitating membrane response in rabbits (Oryctolagus cuniculus) following dorsal hippocampal ablation. , 1975, Journal of comparative and physiological psychology.

[44]  T W Berger,et al.  Hippocampectomy disrupts the topography of conditioned nictitating membrane responses during reversal learning. , 1985, Behavioral neuroscience.

[45]  J. Eccles The cerebellum as a computer: patterns in space and time. , 1973, The Journal of physiology.

[46]  Stephen Grossberg,et al.  Neural dynamics of adaptive timing and temporal discrimination during associative learning , 1989, Neural Networks.

[47]  Joseph E. Steinmetz,et al.  Essential Involvement of Mossy Fibers in Projecting the CS to the Cerebellum during Classical Conditioning , 1988 .

[48]  J. Bloedel,et al.  Classical conditioning of the eyeblink reflex in the decerebrate-decerebellate rabbit , 1990, Behavioural Brain Research.

[49]  V. Braitenberg Is the cerebellar cortex a biological clock in the millisecond range? , 1967, Progress in brain research.

[50]  J. W. Moore,et al.  Brachium conjuntivum and rubrobulbar tract: Brain stem projections of red nucleus essential for the conditioned nictitating membrane response , 1985, Physiology & Behavior.

[51]  I. Martin,et al.  Shape of the conditioned eyelid response. , 1968, Psychological review.