Mind-wandering: mechanistic insights from lesion, tDCS, and iEEG
暂无分享,去创建一个
[1] J. Smallwood,et al. The impact of social isolation and changes in work patterns on ongoing thought during the first COVID-19 lockdown in the United Kingdom , 2021, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.
[2] Richard Carciofo,et al. Deliberate and spontaneous mind wandering in Chinese students: Associations with mindfulness, affect, personality, and life satisfaction , 2021 .
[3] D. Margulies,et al. The default mode network in cognition: a topographical perspective , 2021, Nature Reviews Neuroscience.
[4] Caitlin Mills,et al. How task-unrelated and freely moving thought relate to affect: Evidence for dissociable patterns in everyday life. , 2021, Emotion.
[5] Zachary C. Irving,et al. Distinct electrophysiological signatures of task-unrelated and dynamic thoughts , 2021, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.
[6] P. Dux,et al. Stimulating task unrelated thoughts: tDCS of prefrontal and parietal cortices leads to polarity specific increases in mind wandering , 2020, Neuropsychologia.
[7] G. Csifcsák,et al. The interplay between executive control, behavioural variability and mind wandering: Insights from a high‐definition transcranial direct‐current stimulation study , 2020, The European journal of neuroscience.
[8] P. G. Larsson,et al. Top-Down Attentional Modulation in Human Frontal Cortex: Differential Engagement during External and Internal Attention. , 2020, Cerebral cortex.
[9] R. Knight,et al. Insights into human cognition from intracranial EEG: A review of audition, memory, internal cognition, and causality , 2020, Journal of neural engineering.
[10] D. Margulies,et al. Intrinsic network architecture predicts the effects elicited by intracranial electrical stimulation of the human brain , 2020, Nature Human Behaviour.
[11] Mark S. George,et al. Transcranial electrical stimulation motor threshold can estimate individualized tDCS dosage from reverse-calculation electric-field modeling , 2020, Brain Stimulation.
[12] J. Andrews-Hanna,et al. Dynamic Regulation of Internal Experience , 2020 .
[13] Elizabeth Jefferies,et al. Facing up to the wandering mind: Patterns of off-task laboratory thought are associated with stronger neural recruitment of right fusiform cortex while processing facial stimuli , 2020, NeuroImage.
[14] Guy E. Hawkins,et al. Increasing propensity to mind‐wander by transcranial direct current stimulation? A registered report , 2020, The European journal of neuroscience.
[15] C. Miall,et al. Effect of tDCS Over the Right Inferior Parietal Lobule on Mind-Wandering Propensity , 2020, Frontiers in Human Neuroscience.
[16] Amy L. Daitch,et al. Electrophysiological dynamics of antagonistic brain networks reflect attentional fluctuations , 2020, Nature Communications.
[17] D. Margulies,et al. Missing the forest because of the trees: slower alternations during binocular rivalry are associated with lower levels of visual detail during ongoing thought , 2020, bioRxiv.
[18] D. Tranel,et al. Lesion network mapping demonstrates that mind‐wandering is associated with the default mode network , 2019, Journal of neuroscience research.
[19] J. Mattingley,et al. Modulating brain activity and behaviour with tDCS: Rumours of its death have been greatly exaggerated , 2019, Cortex.
[20] J. Camprodon,et al. Transcranial Direct Current Stimulation of Default Mode Network Parietal Nodes Decreases Negative Mind-Wandering About the Past , 2019, Cognitive Therapy and Research.
[21] Kristoffer Hougaard Madsen,et al. Accessibility of cortical regions to focal TES: Dependence on spatial position, safety, and practical constraints , 2019, NeuroImage.
[22] R. Compton,et al. The wandering mind oscillates: EEG alpha power is enhanced during moments of mind-wandering , 2019, Cognitive, Affective, & Behavioral Neuroscience.
[23] P. G. Larsson,et al. Default network and frontoparietal control network theta connectivity supports internal attention , 2019, Nature Human Behaviour.
[24] D. Margulies,et al. Left dorsolateral prefrontal cortex supports context-dependent prioritisation of off-task thought , 2019, Nature Communications.
[25] Elisabeth A. Murray,et al. Lesion Studies in Contemporary Neuroscience , 2019, Trends in Cognitive Sciences.
[26] Daniel S. Margulies,et al. Individual variation in patterns of task focused, and detailed, thought are uniquely associated within the architecture of the medial temporal lobe , 2019, NeuroImage.
[27] J. Fell,et al. New perspectives for the modulation of mind-wandering using transcranial electric brain stimulation , 2019, Neuroscience.
[28] P. Dux,et al. For a minute there, I lost myself … dosage dependent increases in mind wandering via prefrontal tDCS , 2019, Neuropsychologia.
[29] Robin O Cleveland,et al. Ultrasound Neuromodulation: A Review of Results, Mechanisms and Safety , 2019, Ultrasound in medicine & biology.
[30] T. Kochiyama,et al. Challenge to Unity: Relationship Between Hemispheric Asymmetry of the Default Mode Network and Mind Wandering. , 2019, Cerebral cortex.
[31] Hao-Ting Wang,et al. Modes of operation: A topographic neural gradient supporting stimulus dependent and independent cognition , 2019, NeuroImage.
[32] Hao-Ting Wang,et al. The ebb and flow of attention: Between-subject variation in intrinsic connectivity and cognition associated with the dynamics of ongoing experience , 2019, NeuroImage.
[33] A. Antal,et al. Evidence for Cognitive Placebo and Nocebo Effects in Healthy Individuals , 2018, Scientific Reports.
[34] Guy E. Hawkins,et al. Blinding is compromised for transcranial direct current stimulation at 1 mA for 20 minutes in young healthy adults , 2018 .
[35] Guy E. Hawkins,et al. Transcranial stimulation of the frontal lobes increases propensity of mind-wandering without changing meta-awareness , 2019 .
[36] James M. Shine,et al. Hippocampal atrophy and intrinsic brain network dysfunction relate to alterations in mind wandering in neurodegeneration , 2018, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.
[37] Zachary C. Irving,et al. Mind-Wandering as a Scientific Concept: Cutting through the Definitional Haze , 2018, Trends in Cognitive Sciences.
[38] Marom Bikson,et al. Tolerability and blinding of 4x1 high-definition transcranial direct current stimulation (HD-tDCS) at two and three milliamps , 2018, Brain Stimulation.
[39] D. Margulies,et al. Default mode network can support the level of detail in experience during active task states , 2018, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.
[40] A. Thielscher,et al. Effects of transcranial direct current stimulation for treating depression: A modeling study. , 2018, Journal of affective disorders.
[41] Robert T. Knight,et al. Lateral prefrontal cortex lesion impairs regulation of internally and externally directed attention , 2018, NeuroImage.
[42] D. Schacter,et al. Mind-Wandering as a Natural Kind: A Family-Resemblances View , 2018, Trends in Cognitive Sciences.
[43] Hao-Ting Wang,et al. Distant from input: Evidence of regions within the default mode network supporting perceptually-decoupled and conceptually-guided cognition , 2018, NeuroImage.
[44] C. Baeken,et al. Left prefrontal neuronavigated electrode localization in tDCS: 10–20 EEG system versus MRI-guided neuronavigation , 2018, Psychiatry Research: Neuroimaging.
[45] Amy L. Daitch,et al. Spatial and temporal heterogeneity of neural responses in human posteromedial cortex , 2018, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.
[46] Amy L. Daitch,et al. Intracranial Electrophysiology of the Human Default Network , 2018, Trends in Cognitive Sciences.
[47] Eleanor A. Maguire,et al. Mind-Wandering in People with Hippocampal Damage , 2018, The Journal of Neuroscience.
[48] Brian A. Nosek,et al. The preregistration revolution , 2018, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.
[49] Josef Parvizi,et al. Promises and limitations of human intracranial electroencephalography , 2018, Nature Neuroscience.
[50] G. Corazza,et al. Exploring the Link Between Mind Wandering, Mindfulness, and Creativity: A Multidimensional Approach , 2018 .
[51] Hao-Ting Wang,et al. Dimensions of Experience: Exploring the Heterogeneity of the Wandering Mind , 2018, Psychological science.
[52] Erin L. Rich,et al. Spatiotemporal dynamics of information encoding revealed in orbitofrontal high-gamma , 2017, Nature Communications.
[53] David K. Menon,et al. Default mode contributions to automated information processing , 2017, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.
[54] Zachary C. Irving,et al. Is an off-task mind a freely-moving mind? Examining the relationship between different dimensions of thought , 2017, Consciousness and Cognition.
[55] Jared Medina,et al. No evidential value in samples of transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS) studies of cognition and working memory in healthy populations , 2017, Cortex.
[56] Rita Garbelli,et al. Seizure activity per se does not induce tissue damage markers in human neocortical focal epilepsy , 2017, Annals of neurology.
[57] Michael W. Cole,et al. Heterogeneity within the frontoparietal control network and its relationship to the default and dorsal attention networks , 2017, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.
[58] E. Maguire,et al. Comparing and Contrasting the Cognitive Effects of Hippocampal and Ventromedial Prefrontal Cortex Damage: A Review of Human Lesion Studies , 2017, Neuroscience.
[59] Michael J. Kane,et al. For Whom the Mind Wanders, and When, Varies Across Laboratory and Daily-Life Settings , 2017, Psychological science.
[60] Aaron Kucyi,et al. Just a thought: How mind-wandering is represented in dynamic brain connectivity , 2017, NeuroImage.
[61] Hao-Ting Wang,et al. The role of the default mode network in component processes underlying the wandering mind , 2017, Social cognitive and affective neuroscience.
[62] J. Ioannidis,et al. Empirical assessment of published effect sizes and power in the recent cognitive neuroscience and psychology literature , 2017, PLoS biology.
[63] Jonathan W. Schooler,et al. States of Mind: Characterizing the Neural Bases of Focus and Mind-wandering through Dynamic Functional Connectivity , 2017, Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience.
[64] Elizabeth Jefferies,et al. Tracking thoughts: Exploring the neural architecture of mental time travel during mind-wandering , 2017, NeuroImage.
[65] A. Antal,et al. Placebo Intervention Enhances Reward Learning in Healthy Individuals , 2017, Scientific Reports.
[66] Elena Bertossi,et al. Ventromedial prefrontal damage reduces mind-wandering and biases its temporal focus. , 2016, Social cognitive and affective neuroscience.
[67] R. Ptak,et al. Theta-band functional connectivity in the dorsal fronto-parietal network predicts goal-directed attention , 2016, Neuropsychologia.
[68] Elizabeth Jefferies,et al. Situating the default-mode network along a principal gradient of macroscale cortical organization , 2016, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.
[69] Zachary C. Irving,et al. Mind-wandering as spontaneous thought: a dynamic framework , 2016, Nature Reviews Neuroscience.
[70] E. Ciaramelli,et al. Ventromedial prefrontal damage causes a pervasive impairment of episodic memory and future thinking , 2016, Neuropsychologia.
[71] Rebecca M. Todd,et al. Dynamics of neural recruitment surrounding the spontaneous arising of thoughts in experienced mindfulness practitioners , 2016, NeuroImage.
[72] Daniel L. Schacter,et al. Mind-Wandering With and Without Intention , 2016, Trends in Cognitive Sciences.
[73] Takanori Kochiyama,et al. Causal relationship between effective connectivity within the default mode network and mind-wandering regulation and facilitation , 2016, NeuroImage.
[74] Hao-Ting Wang,et al. Representing Representation: Integration between the Temporal Lobe and the Posterior Cingulate Influences the Content and Form of Spontaneous Thought , 2016, PloS one.
[75] Zachary C. Irving. Mind-wandering is unguided attention: accounting for the “purposeful” wanderer , 2016 .
[76] B. Sahakian,et al. Default Mode Dynamics for Global Functional Integration , 2015, The Journal of Neuroscience.
[77] Axel Thielscher,et al. On the importance of electrode parameters for shaping electric field patterns generated by tDCS , 2015, NeuroImage.
[78] Á. Pascual-Leone,et al. Network localization of neurological symptoms from focal brain lesions. , 2015, Brain : a journal of neurology.
[79] Hamed Ekhtiari,et al. Non-invasive Human Brain Stimulation in Cognitive Neuroscience: A Primer , 2015, Neuron.
[80] Shogo Kajimura,et al. Decreasing propensity to mind-wander with transcranial direct current stimulation , 2015, Neuropsychologia.
[81] Haakon G. Engen,et al. Shaped by the Past: The Default Mode Network Supports Cognition that Is Independent of Immediate Perceptual Input , 2015, PloS one.
[82] R. Nathan Spreng,et al. The wandering brain: Meta-analysis of functional neuroimaging studies of mind-wandering and related spontaneous thought processes , 2015, NeuroImage.
[83] Alexander Opitz,et al. Determinants of the electric field during transcranial direct current stimulation , 2015, NeuroImage.
[84] D. Mirman,et al. Neural Organization of Spoken Language Revealed by Lesion-Symptom Mapping , 2015, Nature Communications.
[85] Geraint Rees,et al. Increasing propensity to mind-wander with transcranial direct current stimulation , 2015, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.
[86] James M. Shine,et al. Shaped by our thoughts – A new task to assess spontaneous cognition and its associated neural correlates in the default network , 2015, Brain and Cognition.
[87] S. Bestmann,et al. Understanding the behavioural consequences of noninvasive brain stimulation , 2015, Trends in Cognitive Sciences.
[88] Daniel Smilek,et al. On the relation of mind wandering and ADHD symptomatology , 2015, Psychonomic bulletin & review.
[89] J. Smallwood,et al. The science of mind wandering: empirically navigating the stream of consciousness. , 2015, Annual review of psychology.
[90] J. Mattingley,et al. Applications of transcranial direct current stimulation for understanding brain function , 2014, Trends in Neurosciences.
[91] Jonathan Smallwood,et al. The Decoupled Mind: Mind-wandering Disrupts Cortical Phase-locking to Perceptual Events , 2014, Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience.
[92] Aaron Kucyi,et al. Dynamic functional connectivity of the default mode network tracks daydreaming , 2014, NeuroImage.
[93] R. Knight,et al. Insights into Human Behavior from Lesions to the Prefrontal Cortex , 2014, Neuron.
[94] R. N. Spreng,et al. The default network and self‐generated thought: component processes, dynamic control, and clinical relevance , 2014, Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences.
[95] J. Rothwell,et al. Variability in Response to Transcranial Direct Current Stimulation of the Motor Cortex , 2014, Brain Stimulation.
[96] A. Hillis. Inability to empathize: brain lesions that disrupt sharing and understanding another's emotions. , 2014, Brain : a journal of neurology.
[97] A. Engel,et al. Entrainment of Brain Oscillations by Transcranial Alternating Current Stimulation , 2014, Current Biology.
[98] K. Miller,et al. Human Retrosplenial Cortex Displays Transient Theta Phase Locking with Medial Temporal Cortex Prior to Activation during Autobiographical Memory Retrieval , 2013, The Journal of Neuroscience.
[99] C. Herrmann,et al. Transcranial alternating current stimulation: a review of the underlying mechanisms and modulation of cognitive processes , 2013, Front. Hum. Neurosci..
[100] Todd C. Handy,et al. Mind Wandering and the Adaptive Control of Attentional Resources , 2013, Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience.
[101] J. Smallwood. Distinguishing how from why the mind wanders: a process-occurrence framework for self-generated mental activity. , 2013, Psychological bulletin.
[102] Brian A. Nosek,et al. Power failure: why small sample size undermines the reliability of neuroscience , 2013, Nature Reviews Neuroscience.
[103] Haakon G. Engen,et al. Escaping the here and now: Evidence for a role of the default mode network in perceptually decoupled thought , 2013, NeuroImage.
[104] Alexander Opitz,et al. Electric field calculations in brain stimulation based on finite elements: An optimized processing pipeline for the generation and usage of accurate individual head models , 2013, Human brain mapping.
[105] Benjamin W. Mooneyham,et al. The costs and benefits of mind-wandering: a review. , 2013, Canadian journal of experimental psychology = Revue canadienne de psychologie experimentale.
[106] Kimberly L. Ray,et al. Meta-analytic evidence for a superordinate cognitive control network subserving diverse executive functions , 2012, Cognitive, affective & behavioral neuroscience.
[107] Kevin S. Brown,et al. Cooperation between the default mode network and the frontal–parietal network in the production of an internal train of thought , 2012, Brain Research.
[108] J. Smallwood,et al. Back to the future: Autobiographical planning and the functionality of mind-wandering , 2011, Consciousness and Cognition.
[109] Erik D. Reichle,et al. Meta-awareness, perceptual decoupling and the wandering mind , 2011, Trends in Cognitive Sciences.
[110] Steve Majerus,et al. Mind-wandering: phenomenology and function as assessed with a novel experience sampling method. , 2011, Acta psychologica.
[111] Kevin Fitzpatrick,et al. Slow Fluctuations in Attentional Control of Sensory Cortex , 2011, Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience.
[112] Daniel P. Kennedy,et al. Differential electrophysiological response during rest, self-referential, and non–self-referential tasks in human posteromedial cortex , 2011, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.
[113] R. Knight,et al. The functional role of cross-frequency coupling , 2010, Trends in Cognitive Sciences.
[114] Daniel L. Schacter,et al. Default network activity, coupled with the frontoparietal control network, supports goal-directed cognition , 2010, NeuroImage.
[115] T. Robbins,et al. Dissociating Inhibition, Attention, and Response Control in the Frontoparietal Network Using Functional Magnetic Resonance Imaging , 2010, Cerebral cortex.
[116] R. Buckner,et al. Functional-Anatomic Fractionation of the Brain's Default Network , 2010, Neuron.
[117] R. Knight,et al. Prefrontal cortex is critical for contextual processing: evidence from brain lesions. , 2009, Brain : a journal of neurology.
[118] J. Driver,et al. Combining TMS and fMRI: From ‘virtual lesions’ to functional-network accounts of cognition , 2009, Cortex.
[119] K. Christoff,et al. Experience sampling during fMRI reveals default network and executive system contributions to mind wandering , 2009, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.
[120] R. Nathan Spreng,et al. The Common Neural Basis of Autobiographical Memory, Prospection, Navigation, Theory of Mind, and the Default Mode: A Quantitative Meta-analysis , 2009, Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience.
[121] Jonathan Smallwood,et al. Going AWOL in the Brain: Mind Wandering Reduces Cortical Analysis of External Events , 2008, Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience.
[122] G. Glover,et al. Dissociable Intrinsic Connectivity Networks for Salience Processing and Executive Control , 2007, The Journal of Neuroscience.
[123] Scott T. Grafton,et al. Wandering Minds: The Default Network and Stimulus-Independent Thought , 2007, Science.
[124] N. Logothetis,et al. Neurophysiological investigation of the basis of the fMRI signal , 2001, Nature.
[125] M. Hallett. Transcranial magnetic stimulation and the human brain , 2000, Nature.
[126] L. Giambra,et al. The influence of aging on spontaneous shifts of attention from external stimuli to the contents of consciousness , 1993, Experimental Gerontology.
[127] J. Antrobus. INFORMATION THEORY AND STIMULUS‐INDEPENDENT THOUGHT , 1968 .
[128] W. Scoville,et al. LOSS OF RECENT MEMORY AFTER BILATERAL HIPPOCAMPAL LESIONS , 1957, Journal of neurology, neurosurgery, and psychiatry.
[129] Daniel L. Schacter,et al. Intrinsic Architecture Underlying the Relations among the Default, Dorsal Attention, and Frontoparietal Control Networks of the Human Brain , 2013, Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience.
[130] R. Knight,et al. Role of human prefrontal cortex in attention control. , 1995, Advances in neurology.