Mind-wandering: mechanistic insights from lesion, tDCS, and iEEG

[1]  J. Smallwood,et al.  The impact of social isolation and changes in work patterns on ongoing thought during the first COVID-19 lockdown in the United Kingdom , 2021, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[2]  Richard Carciofo,et al.  Deliberate and spontaneous mind wandering in Chinese students: Associations with mindfulness, affect, personality, and life satisfaction , 2021 .

[3]  D. Margulies,et al.  The default mode network in cognition: a topographical perspective , 2021, Nature Reviews Neuroscience.

[4]  Caitlin Mills,et al.  How task-unrelated and freely moving thought relate to affect: Evidence for dissociable patterns in everyday life. , 2021, Emotion.

[5]  Zachary C. Irving,et al.  Distinct electrophysiological signatures of task-unrelated and dynamic thoughts , 2021, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[6]  P. Dux,et al.  Stimulating task unrelated thoughts: tDCS of prefrontal and parietal cortices leads to polarity specific increases in mind wandering , 2020, Neuropsychologia.

[7]  G. Csifcsák,et al.  The interplay between executive control, behavioural variability and mind wandering: Insights from a high‐definition transcranial direct‐current stimulation study , 2020, The European journal of neuroscience.

[8]  P. G. Larsson,et al.  Top-Down Attentional Modulation in Human Frontal Cortex: Differential Engagement during External and Internal Attention. , 2020, Cerebral cortex.

[9]  R. Knight,et al.  Insights into human cognition from intracranial EEG: A review of audition, memory, internal cognition, and causality , 2020, Journal of neural engineering.

[10]  D. Margulies,et al.  Intrinsic network architecture predicts the effects elicited by intracranial electrical stimulation of the human brain , 2020, Nature Human Behaviour.

[11]  Mark S. George,et al.  Transcranial electrical stimulation motor threshold can estimate individualized tDCS dosage from reverse-calculation electric-field modeling , 2020, Brain Stimulation.

[12]  J. Andrews-Hanna,et al.  Dynamic Regulation of Internal Experience , 2020 .

[13]  Elizabeth Jefferies,et al.  Facing up to the wandering mind: Patterns of off-task laboratory thought are associated with stronger neural recruitment of right fusiform cortex while processing facial stimuli , 2020, NeuroImage.

[14]  Guy E. Hawkins,et al.  Increasing propensity to mind‐wander by transcranial direct current stimulation? A registered report , 2020, The European journal of neuroscience.

[15]  C. Miall,et al.  Effect of tDCS Over the Right Inferior Parietal Lobule on Mind-Wandering Propensity , 2020, Frontiers in Human Neuroscience.

[16]  Amy L. Daitch,et al.  Electrophysiological dynamics of antagonistic brain networks reflect attentional fluctuations , 2020, Nature Communications.

[17]  D. Margulies,et al.  Missing the forest because of the trees: slower alternations during binocular rivalry are associated with lower levels of visual detail during ongoing thought , 2020, bioRxiv.

[18]  D. Tranel,et al.  Lesion network mapping demonstrates that mind‐wandering is associated with the default mode network , 2019, Journal of neuroscience research.

[19]  J. Mattingley,et al.  Modulating brain activity and behaviour with tDCS: Rumours of its death have been greatly exaggerated , 2019, Cortex.

[20]  J. Camprodon,et al.  Transcranial Direct Current Stimulation of Default Mode Network Parietal Nodes Decreases Negative Mind-Wandering About the Past , 2019, Cognitive Therapy and Research.

[21]  Kristoffer Hougaard Madsen,et al.  Accessibility of cortical regions to focal TES: Dependence on spatial position, safety, and practical constraints , 2019, NeuroImage.

[22]  R. Compton,et al.  The wandering mind oscillates: EEG alpha power is enhanced during moments of mind-wandering , 2019, Cognitive, Affective, & Behavioral Neuroscience.

[23]  P. G. Larsson,et al.  Default network and frontoparietal control network theta connectivity supports internal attention , 2019, Nature Human Behaviour.

[24]  D. Margulies,et al.  Left dorsolateral prefrontal cortex supports context-dependent prioritisation of off-task thought , 2019, Nature Communications.

[25]  Elisabeth A. Murray,et al.  Lesion Studies in Contemporary Neuroscience , 2019, Trends in Cognitive Sciences.

[26]  Daniel S. Margulies,et al.  Individual variation in patterns of task focused, and detailed, thought are uniquely associated within the architecture of the medial temporal lobe , 2019, NeuroImage.

[27]  J. Fell,et al.  New perspectives for the modulation of mind-wandering using transcranial electric brain stimulation , 2019, Neuroscience.

[28]  P. Dux,et al.  For a minute there, I lost myself … dosage dependent increases in mind wandering via prefrontal tDCS , 2019, Neuropsychologia.

[29]  Robin O Cleveland,et al.  Ultrasound Neuromodulation: A Review of Results, Mechanisms and Safety , 2019, Ultrasound in medicine & biology.

[30]  T. Kochiyama,et al.  Challenge to Unity: Relationship Between Hemispheric Asymmetry of the Default Mode Network and Mind Wandering. , 2019, Cerebral cortex.

[31]  Hao-Ting Wang,et al.  Modes of operation: A topographic neural gradient supporting stimulus dependent and independent cognition , 2019, NeuroImage.

[32]  Hao-Ting Wang,et al.  The ebb and flow of attention: Between-subject variation in intrinsic connectivity and cognition associated with the dynamics of ongoing experience , 2019, NeuroImage.

[33]  A. Antal,et al.  Evidence for Cognitive Placebo and Nocebo Effects in Healthy Individuals , 2018, Scientific Reports.

[34]  Guy E. Hawkins,et al.  Blinding is compromised for transcranial direct current stimulation at 1 mA for 20 minutes in young healthy adults , 2018 .

[35]  Guy E. Hawkins,et al.  Transcranial stimulation of the frontal lobes increases propensity of mind-wandering without changing meta-awareness , 2019 .

[36]  James M. Shine,et al.  Hippocampal atrophy and intrinsic brain network dysfunction relate to alterations in mind wandering in neurodegeneration , 2018, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[37]  Zachary C. Irving,et al.  Mind-Wandering as a Scientific Concept: Cutting through the Definitional Haze , 2018, Trends in Cognitive Sciences.

[38]  Marom Bikson,et al.  Tolerability and blinding of 4x1 high-definition transcranial direct current stimulation (HD-tDCS) at two and three milliamps , 2018, Brain Stimulation.

[39]  D. Margulies,et al.  Default mode network can support the level of detail in experience during active task states , 2018, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[40]  A. Thielscher,et al.  Effects of transcranial direct current stimulation for treating depression: A modeling study. , 2018, Journal of affective disorders.

[41]  Robert T. Knight,et al.  Lateral prefrontal cortex lesion impairs regulation of internally and externally directed attention , 2018, NeuroImage.

[42]  D. Schacter,et al.  Mind-Wandering as a Natural Kind: A Family-Resemblances View , 2018, Trends in Cognitive Sciences.

[43]  Hao-Ting Wang,et al.  Distant from input: Evidence of regions within the default mode network supporting perceptually-decoupled and conceptually-guided cognition , 2018, NeuroImage.

[44]  C. Baeken,et al.  Left prefrontal neuronavigated electrode localization in tDCS: 10–20 EEG system versus MRI-guided neuronavigation , 2018, Psychiatry Research: Neuroimaging.

[45]  Amy L. Daitch,et al.  Spatial and temporal heterogeneity of neural responses in human posteromedial cortex , 2018, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[46]  Amy L. Daitch,et al.  Intracranial Electrophysiology of the Human Default Network , 2018, Trends in Cognitive Sciences.

[47]  Eleanor A. Maguire,et al.  Mind-Wandering in People with Hippocampal Damage , 2018, The Journal of Neuroscience.

[48]  Brian A. Nosek,et al.  The preregistration revolution , 2018, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[49]  Josef Parvizi,et al.  Promises and limitations of human intracranial electroencephalography , 2018, Nature Neuroscience.

[50]  G. Corazza,et al.  Exploring the Link Between Mind Wandering, Mindfulness, and Creativity: A Multidimensional Approach , 2018 .

[51]  Hao-Ting Wang,et al.  Dimensions of Experience: Exploring the Heterogeneity of the Wandering Mind , 2018, Psychological science.

[52]  Erin L. Rich,et al.  Spatiotemporal dynamics of information encoding revealed in orbitofrontal high-gamma , 2017, Nature Communications.

[53]  David K. Menon,et al.  Default mode contributions to automated information processing , 2017, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[54]  Zachary C. Irving,et al.  Is an off-task mind a freely-moving mind? Examining the relationship between different dimensions of thought , 2017, Consciousness and Cognition.

[55]  Jared Medina,et al.  No evidential value in samples of transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS) studies of cognition and working memory in healthy populations , 2017, Cortex.

[56]  Rita Garbelli,et al.  Seizure activity per se does not induce tissue damage markers in human neocortical focal epilepsy , 2017, Annals of neurology.

[57]  Michael W. Cole,et al.  Heterogeneity within the frontoparietal control network and its relationship to the default and dorsal attention networks , 2017, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[58]  E. Maguire,et al.  Comparing and Contrasting the Cognitive Effects of Hippocampal and Ventromedial Prefrontal Cortex Damage: A Review of Human Lesion Studies , 2017, Neuroscience.

[59]  Michael J. Kane,et al.  For Whom the Mind Wanders, and When, Varies Across Laboratory and Daily-Life Settings , 2017, Psychological science.

[60]  Aaron Kucyi,et al.  Just a thought: How mind-wandering is represented in dynamic brain connectivity , 2017, NeuroImage.

[61]  Hao-Ting Wang,et al.  The role of the default mode network in component processes underlying the wandering mind , 2017, Social cognitive and affective neuroscience.

[62]  J. Ioannidis,et al.  Empirical assessment of published effect sizes and power in the recent cognitive neuroscience and psychology literature , 2017, PLoS biology.

[63]  Jonathan W. Schooler,et al.  States of Mind: Characterizing the Neural Bases of Focus and Mind-wandering through Dynamic Functional Connectivity , 2017, Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience.

[64]  Elizabeth Jefferies,et al.  Tracking thoughts: Exploring the neural architecture of mental time travel during mind-wandering , 2017, NeuroImage.

[65]  A. Antal,et al.  Placebo Intervention Enhances Reward Learning in Healthy Individuals , 2017, Scientific Reports.

[66]  Elena Bertossi,et al.  Ventromedial prefrontal damage reduces mind-wandering and biases its temporal focus. , 2016, Social cognitive and affective neuroscience.

[67]  R. Ptak,et al.  Theta-band functional connectivity in the dorsal fronto-parietal network predicts goal-directed attention , 2016, Neuropsychologia.

[68]  Elizabeth Jefferies,et al.  Situating the default-mode network along a principal gradient of macroscale cortical organization , 2016, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[69]  Zachary C. Irving,et al.  Mind-wandering as spontaneous thought: a dynamic framework , 2016, Nature Reviews Neuroscience.

[70]  E. Ciaramelli,et al.  Ventromedial prefrontal damage causes a pervasive impairment of episodic memory and future thinking , 2016, Neuropsychologia.

[71]  Rebecca M. Todd,et al.  Dynamics of neural recruitment surrounding the spontaneous arising of thoughts in experienced mindfulness practitioners , 2016, NeuroImage.

[72]  Daniel L. Schacter,et al.  Mind-Wandering With and Without Intention , 2016, Trends in Cognitive Sciences.

[73]  Takanori Kochiyama,et al.  Causal relationship between effective connectivity within the default mode network and mind-wandering regulation and facilitation , 2016, NeuroImage.

[74]  Hao-Ting Wang,et al.  Representing Representation: Integration between the Temporal Lobe and the Posterior Cingulate Influences the Content and Form of Spontaneous Thought , 2016, PloS one.

[75]  Zachary C. Irving.  Mind-wandering is unguided attention: accounting for the “purposeful” wanderer , 2016 .

[76]  B. Sahakian,et al.  Default Mode Dynamics for Global Functional Integration , 2015, The Journal of Neuroscience.

[77]  Axel Thielscher,et al.  On the importance of electrode parameters for shaping electric field patterns generated by tDCS , 2015, NeuroImage.

[78]  Á. Pascual-Leone,et al.  Network localization of neurological symptoms from focal brain lesions. , 2015, Brain : a journal of neurology.

[79]  Hamed Ekhtiari,et al.  Non-invasive Human Brain Stimulation in Cognitive Neuroscience: A Primer , 2015, Neuron.

[80]  Shogo Kajimura,et al.  Decreasing propensity to mind-wander with transcranial direct current stimulation , 2015, Neuropsychologia.

[81]  Haakon G. Engen,et al.  Shaped by the Past: The Default Mode Network Supports Cognition that Is Independent of Immediate Perceptual Input , 2015, PloS one.

[82]  R. Nathan Spreng,et al.  The wandering brain: Meta-analysis of functional neuroimaging studies of mind-wandering and related spontaneous thought processes , 2015, NeuroImage.

[83]  Alexander Opitz,et al.  Determinants of the electric field during transcranial direct current stimulation , 2015, NeuroImage.

[84]  D. Mirman,et al.  Neural Organization of Spoken Language Revealed by Lesion-Symptom Mapping , 2015, Nature Communications.

[85]  Geraint Rees,et al.  Increasing propensity to mind-wander with transcranial direct current stimulation , 2015, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[86]  James M. Shine,et al.  Shaped by our thoughts – A new task to assess spontaneous cognition and its associated neural correlates in the default network , 2015, Brain and Cognition.

[87]  S. Bestmann,et al.  Understanding the behavioural consequences of noninvasive brain stimulation , 2015, Trends in Cognitive Sciences.

[88]  Daniel Smilek,et al.  On the relation of mind wandering and ADHD symptomatology , 2015, Psychonomic bulletin & review.

[89]  J. Smallwood,et al.  The science of mind wandering: empirically navigating the stream of consciousness. , 2015, Annual review of psychology.

[90]  J. Mattingley,et al.  Applications of transcranial direct current stimulation for understanding brain function , 2014, Trends in Neurosciences.

[91]  Jonathan Smallwood,et al.  The Decoupled Mind: Mind-wandering Disrupts Cortical Phase-locking to Perceptual Events , 2014, Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience.

[92]  Aaron Kucyi,et al.  Dynamic functional connectivity of the default mode network tracks daydreaming , 2014, NeuroImage.

[93]  R. Knight,et al.  Insights into Human Behavior from Lesions to the Prefrontal Cortex , 2014, Neuron.

[94]  R. N. Spreng,et al.  The default network and self‐generated thought: component processes, dynamic control, and clinical relevance , 2014, Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences.

[95]  J. Rothwell,et al.  Variability in Response to Transcranial Direct Current Stimulation of the Motor Cortex , 2014, Brain Stimulation.

[96]  A. Hillis.  Inability to empathize: brain lesions that disrupt sharing and understanding another's emotions. , 2014, Brain : a journal of neurology.

[97]  A. Engel,et al.  Entrainment of Brain Oscillations by Transcranial Alternating Current Stimulation , 2014, Current Biology.

[98]  K. Miller,et al.  Human Retrosplenial Cortex Displays Transient Theta Phase Locking with Medial Temporal Cortex Prior to Activation during Autobiographical Memory Retrieval , 2013, The Journal of Neuroscience.

[99]  C. Herrmann,et al.  Transcranial alternating current stimulation: a review of the underlying mechanisms and modulation of cognitive processes , 2013, Front. Hum. Neurosci..

[100]  Todd C. Handy,et al.  Mind Wandering and the Adaptive Control of Attentional Resources , 2013, Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience.

[101]  J. Smallwood.  Distinguishing how from why the mind wanders: a process-occurrence framework for self-generated mental activity. , 2013, Psychological bulletin.

[102]  Brian A. Nosek,et al.  Power failure: why small sample size undermines the reliability of neuroscience , 2013, Nature Reviews Neuroscience.

[103]  Haakon G. Engen,et al.  Escaping the here and now: Evidence for a role of the default mode network in perceptually decoupled thought , 2013, NeuroImage.

[104]  Alexander Opitz,et al.  Electric field calculations in brain stimulation based on finite elements: An optimized processing pipeline for the generation and usage of accurate individual head models , 2013, Human brain mapping.

[105]  Benjamin W. Mooneyham,et al.  The costs and benefits of mind-wandering: a review. , 2013, Canadian journal of experimental psychology = Revue canadienne de psychologie experimentale.

[106]  Kimberly L. Ray,et al.  Meta-analytic evidence for a superordinate cognitive control network subserving diverse executive functions , 2012, Cognitive, affective & behavioral neuroscience.

[107]  Kevin S. Brown,et al.  Cooperation between the default mode network and the frontal–parietal network in the production of an internal train of thought , 2012, Brain Research.

[108]  J. Smallwood,et al.  Back to the future: Autobiographical planning and the functionality of mind-wandering , 2011, Consciousness and Cognition.

[109]  Erik D. Reichle,et al.  Meta-awareness, perceptual decoupling and the wandering mind , 2011, Trends in Cognitive Sciences.

[110]  Steve Majerus,et al.  Mind-wandering: phenomenology and function as assessed with a novel experience sampling method. , 2011, Acta psychologica.

[111]  Kevin Fitzpatrick,et al.  Slow Fluctuations in Attentional Control of Sensory Cortex , 2011, Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience.

[112]  Daniel P. Kennedy,et al.  Differential electrophysiological response during rest, self-referential, and non–self-referential tasks in human posteromedial cortex , 2011, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[113]  R. Knight,et al.  The functional role of cross-frequency coupling , 2010, Trends in Cognitive Sciences.

[114]  Daniel L. Schacter,et al.  Default network activity, coupled with the frontoparietal control network, supports goal-directed cognition , 2010, NeuroImage.

[115]  T. Robbins,et al.  Dissociating Inhibition, Attention, and Response Control in the Frontoparietal Network Using Functional Magnetic Resonance Imaging , 2010, Cerebral cortex.

[116]  R. Buckner,et al.  Functional-Anatomic Fractionation of the Brain's Default Network , 2010, Neuron.

[117]  R. Knight,et al.  Prefrontal cortex is critical for contextual processing: evidence from brain lesions. , 2009, Brain : a journal of neurology.

[118]  J. Driver,et al.  Combining TMS and fMRI: From ‘virtual lesions’ to functional-network accounts of cognition , 2009, Cortex.

[119]  K. Christoff,et al.  Experience sampling during fMRI reveals default network and executive system contributions to mind wandering , 2009, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[120]  R. Nathan Spreng,et al.  The Common Neural Basis of Autobiographical Memory, Prospection, Navigation, Theory of Mind, and the Default Mode: A Quantitative Meta-analysis , 2009, Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience.

[121]  Jonathan Smallwood,et al.  Going AWOL in the Brain: Mind Wandering Reduces Cortical Analysis of External Events , 2008, Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience.

[122]  G. Glover,et al.  Dissociable Intrinsic Connectivity Networks for Salience Processing and Executive Control , 2007, The Journal of Neuroscience.

[123]  Scott T. Grafton,et al.  Wandering Minds: The Default Network and Stimulus-Independent Thought , 2007, Science.

[124]  N. Logothetis,et al.  Neurophysiological investigation of the basis of the fMRI signal , 2001, Nature.

[125]  M. Hallett.  Transcranial magnetic stimulation and the human brain , 2000, Nature.

[126]  L. Giambra,et al.  The influence of aging on spontaneous shifts of attention from external stimuli to the contents of consciousness , 1993, Experimental Gerontology.

[127]  J. Antrobus.  INFORMATION THEORY AND STIMULUS‐INDEPENDENT THOUGHT , 1968 .

[128]  W. Scoville,et al.  LOSS OF RECENT MEMORY AFTER BILATERAL HIPPOCAMPAL LESIONS , 1957, Journal of neurology, neurosurgery, and psychiatry.

[129]  Daniel L. Schacter,et al.  Intrinsic Architecture Underlying the Relations among the Default, Dorsal Attention, and Frontoparietal Control Networks of the Human Brain , 2013, Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience.

[130]  R. Knight,et al.  Role of human prefrontal cortex in attention control. , 1995, Advances in neurology.