Imitation components in the human brain: An fMRI study

Human ability to imitate movements is instantiated in parietal, premotor and opercular structures, often referred to as the human homologue of the macaque mirror neuron system. As most studies employed imitation of specular models (participants imitated the seen movement as their mirror reflection), it is unclear whether the structures implicated code for the anatomical compatibility between the performer and the model or the spatial compatibility between the location at which both movements occur. We used fMRI to disentangle the neural mechanisms underlying anatomical and spatial components of imitation. Participants moved one finger which was either spatially or anatomically compatible with the finger moved in a video-display. In keeping with the existent behavioral literature, we found that during the spatial task, participants' responses were faster when the seen movement was also anatomically compatible, whereas in the anatomical task, responses were faster when the seen movement was also spatially compatible. Critically, the activity of the parietal opercula bilaterally was associated with the anatomical compatibility effect. Furthermore, increased activity of the left middle frontal gyrus and right superior temporal sulcus (extending to the temporo-parietal junction) was found in those trials in which the spatial mapping between the seen and executed movements was detrimental for the anatomical task. Our findings extend current understanding of the role played by spatial and anatomical components in imitation and provide new insights about the parietal opercula.

[1]  Timothy Edward John Behrens,et al.  Anatomical and Functional Connectivity of Cytoarchitectonic Areas within the Human Parietal Operculum , 2010, The Journal of Neuroscience.

[2]  R. Wise,et al.  Separate Areas for Mirror Responses and Agency within the Parietal Operculum , 2008, The Journal of Neuroscience.

[3]  S. R. Searle,et al.  General Linear Model , 2014 .

[4]  Ewald Moser,et al.  The selection of intended actions and the observation of others' actions: A time-resolved fMRI study , 2006, NeuroImage.

[5]  Marcel Brass,et al.  The Inhibition of Imitative Response Tendencies , 2001, NeuroImage.

[6]  Stephen M. Rao,et al.  Neural Mechanisms of Visual Attention: Object-Based Selection of a Region in Space , 2000, Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience.

[7]  Matthew R Longo,et al.  Imitative response tendencies following observation of intransitive actions. , 2006, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[8]  P Cairney,et al.  Spatial relationships and S-R compatibility. , 1972, Acta psychologica.

[9]  L Krubitzer,et al.  A redefinition of somatosensory areas in the lateral sulcus of macaque monkeys , 1995, The Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience.

[10]  W. Penny,et al.  Random-Effects Analysis , 2002 .

[11]  Karl J. Friston,et al.  Human Brain Function , 1997 .

[12]  J. Mazziotta,et al.  Modulation of cortical activity during different imitative behaviors. , 2003, Journal of neurophysiology.

[13]  G. Fink,et al.  What Is the Position of an Arm Relative to the Body? Neural Correlates of Body Schema and Body Structural Description , 2009, The Journal of Neuroscience.

[14]  James B. Rowe,et al.  Working Memory for Location and Time: Activity in Prefrontal Area 46 Relates to Selection Rather than Maintenance in Memory , 2001, NeuroImage.

[15]  J. Mazziotta,et al.  Cortical mechanisms of human imitation. , 1999, Science.

[16]  John W. Lane,et al.  Receptive Field (RF) Properties of the Macaque Second Somatosensory Cortex: RF Size, Shape, and Somatotopic Organization , 2006, The Journal of Neuroscience.

[17]  R. Hari,et al.  Modulated Activation of the Human SI and SII Cortices during Observation of Hand Actions , 2002, NeuroImage.

[18]  K. Amunts,et al.  The human parietal operculum. II. Stereotaxic maps and correlation with functional imaging results. , 2006, Cerebral cortex.

[19]  M. Brass,et al.  The inhibition of imitative and overlearned responses: a functional double dissociation , 2005, Neuropsychologia.

[20]  W. D. Penny,et al.  Random-Effects Analysis , 2002 .

[21]  Gereon R Fink,et al.  The somatotopic organization of cytoarchitectonic areas on the human parietal operculum. , 2007, Cerebral cortex.

[22]  R. C. Oldfield The assessment and analysis of handedness: the Edinburgh inventory. , 1971, Neuropsychologia.

[23]  Simon B. Eickhoff,et al.  A new SPM toolbox for combining probabilistic cytoarchitectonic maps and functional imaging data , 2005, NeuroImage.

[24]  Gereon R Fink,et al.  Cerebral correlates of alerting, orienting and reorienting of visuospatial attention: an event-related fMRI study , 2004, NeuroImage.

[25]  G. Rizzolatti,et al.  Neurophysiological mechanisms underlying the understanding and imitation of action , 2001, Nature Reviews Neuroscience.

[26]  W. Prinz Perception and Action Planning , 1997 .

[27]  David C Lyon,et al.  Cortical and thalamic connections of the parietal ventral somatosensory area in marmoset monkeys (Callithrix jacchus) , 2002, The Journal of comparative neurology.

[28]  A. Meltzoff,et al.  An fMRI study of imitation: action representation and body schema , 2005, Neuropsychologia.

[29]  J. Ashe,et al.  The Effect of Stimulus–Response Compatibility on Cortical Motor Activation , 2001, NeuroImage.

[30]  A. Schleicher,et al.  The human parietal operculum. I. Cytoarchitectonic mapping of subdivisions. , 2006, Cerebral cortex.

[31]  J. Mazziotta,et al.  Brain-behavior relationships: evidence from practice effects in spatial stimulus-response compatibility. , 1996, Journal of neurophysiology.

[32]  W. Prinz,et al.  Movement observation affects movement execution in a simple response task. , 2001, Acta psychologica.

[33]  M. Corbetta,et al.  The Reorienting System of the Human Brain: From Environment to Theory of Mind , 2008, Neuron.

[34]  L. Fogassi,et al.  A Touching Sight SII/PV Activation during the Observation and Experience of Touch , 2004, Neuron.

[35]  Srikantan S Nagarajan,et al.  Sensorimotor integration in S2, PV, and parietal rostroventral areas of the human sylvian fissure. , 2007, Journal of neurophysiology.

[36]  Leah Krubitzer,et al.  Cortical connections of the second somatosensory area and the parietal ventral area in macaque monkeys , 2003, The Journal of comparative neurology.

[37]  M. Corbetta,et al.  Neural Systems for Visual Orienting and Their Relationships to Spatial Working Memory , 2002, Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience.

[38]  Aina Puce,et al.  Configural Processing of Biological Motion in Human Superior Temporal Sulcus , 2005, The Journal of Neuroscience.

[39]  W. Prinz,et al.  Compatibility between Observed and Executed Finger Movements: Comparing Symbolic, Spatial, and Imitative Cues , 2000, Brain and Cognition.

[40]  Mara Fabri,et al.  Cortical areas within the lateral sulcus connected to cutaneous representations in areas 3b and 1: A revised interpretation of the second somatosensory area in macaque monkeys , 1995, The Journal of comparative neurology.

[41]  Ralph Weidner,et al.  What is “Odd” in Posner's Location-cueing Paradigm? Neural Responses to Unexpected Location and Feature Changes Compared , 2009, Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience.

[42]  Sreenivasa Rao Jammalamadaka,et al.  General Linear Model , 2003 .

[43]  R. Cabeza,et al.  Imaging Cognition II: An Empirical Review of 275 PET and fMRI Studies , 2000, Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience.

[44]  John W. Lane,et al.  Receptive Field Properties of the Macaque Second Somatosensory Cortex: Evidence for Multiple Functional Representations , 2004, The Journal of Neuroscience.

[45]  Karl J. Friston,et al.  Rigid Body Registration , 2003 .

[46]  Aina Puce,et al.  Electrophysiology and brain imaging of biological motion. , 2003, Philosophical transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Biological sciences.

[47]  Robert T. Knight,et al.  Superior Temporal SulcusIt's My Area: Or Is It? , 2008, Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience.

[48]  Jon H Kaas,et al.  The organization of somatosensory cortex in anthropoid primates. , 2003, Advances in neurology.

[49]  L. Krubitzer,et al.  Somatotopic organization of cortical fields in the lateral sulcus of Homo sapiens: Evidence for SII and PV , 2000, The Journal of comparative neurology.

[50]  K. Zilles,et al.  Polymodal Motion Processing in Posterior Parietal and Premotor Cortex A Human fMRI Study Strongly Implies Equivalencies between Humans and Monkeys , 2001, Neuron.

[51]  Maurizio Corbetta,et al.  The human brain is intrinsically organized into dynamic, anticorrelated functional networks. , 2005, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[52]  R. Goebel,et al.  The brain's intention to imitate: The neurobiology of intentional versus automatic imitation , 2008, Brain Stimulation.

[53]  Mark D'Esposito,et al.  Selection and maintenance of stimulus–response rules during preparation and performance of a spatial choice-reaction task , 2007, Brain Research.

[54]  John W. Lane,et al.  Receptive Field Properties of the Macaque Second Somatosensory Cortex: Representation of Orientation on Different Finger Pads , 2006, The Journal of Neuroscience.

[55]  Simon B Eickhoff,et al.  Dissociating bottom-up and top-down processes in a manual stimulus-response compatibility task. , 2010, Journal of neurophysiology.

[56]  S. Miyauchi,et al.  Neural mechanisms of spatial stimulus–response compatibility: the effect of crossed-hand position , 2004, Experimental Brain Research.

[57]  P. Haggard,et al.  Neural signatures of body ownership: a sensory network for bodily self-consciousness. , 2007, Cerebral cortex.

[58]  Riitta Hari,et al.  Three hands: fragmentation of human bodily awareness , 1998, Neuroscience Letters.

[59]  Karl J. Friston,et al.  Analysis of functional MRI time‐series , 1994, Human Brain Mapping.