An agent-based model of organizational ambidexterity decisions and strategies in new product development

Organizational ambidexterity, defined as the pursuit of both exploitation and exploration, has become an important topic in the study of organizations, especially in innovation management theory. Previous literature has not focused on the strategic (game-theoretic) aspects of organizational ambidexterity or on its decision-making aspects. Little is known about how or even whether the decision to adopt ambidexterity is competitively advantageous in the presence of diverse strategies that competitors may adopt. This facet of the subject is inherently game-theoretic; the value of a decision by one firm depends in part on decisions made by other firms. This paper initiates systematic investigation of these strategic aspects, including the overall performance of available strategies. Specifically, this study examines questions of ambidexterity-related strategy performance in the context of new product development. The main contributions are (1) to introduce and make available to the research community an agent-based model and decision support system that captures many of the key aspects and tradeoffs, which have been identified in the literature, of the exploration–exploitation dilemma faced by firms in the new product development process, with a focus on organizations’ product investment decisions and (2) to report on results obtained from the model, calibrated with available data from the literature, augmented by new data collected from interviews with practitioners.

[1]  J. Birkinshaw,et al.  Organizational Ambidexterity: Antecedents, Outcomes, and Moderators , 2008 .

[2]  Michael Tushman,et al.  Organizational Ambidexterity: IBM and Emerging Business Opportunities , 2009 .

[3]  Zi-Lin He,et al.  Exploration vs. Exploitation: An Empirical Test of the Ambidexterity Hypothesis , 2004, Organ. Sci..

[4]  Mary J. Benner,et al.  Exploitation, Exploration, and Process Management: The Productivity Dilemma Revisited , 2003 .

[5]  Charles M. Macal,et al.  Managing Business Complexity: Discovering Strategic Solutions with Agent-Based Modeling and Simulation , 2007 .

[6]  Ken G. Smith,et al.  The interplay between exploration and exploitation. , 2006 .

[7]  Saltelli Andrea,et al.  Global Sensitivity Analysis: The Primer , 2008 .

[8]  J. Birkinshaw,et al.  Clarifying the Distinctive Contribution of Ambidexterity to the Field of Organization Studies , 2013 .

[9]  M. Tushman,et al.  Organizational Ambidexterity: Past, Present and Future , 2013 .

[10]  W VolberdaHenk,et al.  The Multifaceted Nature of Exploration and Exploitation , 2007 .

[11]  Kathleen M. Eisenhardt,et al.  Developing Theory Through Simulation Methods , 2006 .

[12]  Robert F. Lusch,et al.  Agent-Based Modeling of Ambidextrous Organizations: Virtualizing Competitive Strategy , 2007, IEEE Intelligent Systems.

[13]  Justin J. P. Jansen,et al.  Ambidexterity and performance in multiunit contexts: Cross‐level moderating effects of structural and resource attributes , 2012 .

[14]  S. Tarba,et al.  Organizational Ambidexterity and Performance: A Meta-Analysis , 2013 .

[15]  Qing Cao,et al.  Unpacking Organizational Ambidexterity: Dimensions, Contingencies, and Synergistic Effects , 2009, Organ. Sci..

[16]  FangChristina,et al.  Balancing Exploration and Exploitation Through Structural Design , 2010 .

[17]  Glenn B. Voss,et al.  The Effects of Slack Resources and Environmentalthreat on Product Exploration and Exploitation , 2008 .

[18]  Jin K. Han,et al.  Market Orientation and Organizational Performance: Is Innovation a Missing Link? , 1998 .

[19]  Julian Birkinshaw,et al.  Organizational Ambidexterity: Balancing Exploitation and Exploration for Sustained Performance , 2009, Organ. Sci..

[20]  M. Tushman,et al.  Ambidexterity as a Dynamic Capability: Resolving the Innovator's Dilemma , 2007 .

[21]  M. Tushman,et al.  Dynamic Capabilities at IBM: Driving Strategy into Action , 2007 .

[22]  M. Tushman,et al.  Ambidextrous Organizations: Managing Evolutionary and Revolutionary Change , 1996 .

[23]  Robert J. Lempert,et al.  Making Computational Social Science Effective , 2002 .

[24]  Rosanna Garcia.  Uses of Agent-Based Modeling in Innovation/New Product Development Research , 2005 .

[25]  W. Hamilton,et al.  The Evolution of Cooperation , 1984 .

[26]  Kwaku Atuahene-Gima,et al.  Using Exploratory and Exploitative Market Learning for New Product Development , 2010 .

[27]  Alexei Sharpanskykh,et al.  An agent-based approach for structured modeling, analysis and improvement of safety culture , 2011, Comput. Math. Organ. Theory.

[28]  Subodh P. Kulkarni,et al.  Winning through Innovation: A Practical Guide to Leading Organizational Change and Renewal , 1998 .

[29]  Gregory G. Dess,et al.  Dimensions of Organizational Task Environments. , 1984 .

[30]  Sebastian Raisch.  Balanced Structures: Designing Organizations for Profitable Growth , 2008 .

[31]  Daniel A. Levinthal,et al.  Temporarily Divide to Conquer: Centralized, Decentralized, and Reintegrated Organizational Approaches to Exploration and Adaptation , 2003 .

[32]  Steve Bankes,et al.  Exploratory Modeling for Policy Analysis , 1993, Oper. Res..

[33]  David L. Deeds,et al.  Exploration and Exploitation Alliances in Biotechnology: A System of New Product Development , 2004 .

[34]  Cynthia A. Montgomery,et al.  Tobin's q and the Importance of Focus in Firm Performance , 1988 .

[35]  J. March.  Exploration and exploitation in organizational learning , 1991, STUDI ORGANIZZATIVI.

[36]  Bernard J. Jaworski,et al.  Market orientation: The construct, research propositions, and managerial implications. , 1990 .

[37]  P. Adler,et al.  Flexibility Versus Efficiency? a Case Study of Model Changeovers in the Toyota Production System , 1999 .

[38]  Minghao Wang,et al.  Agent-based modeling and simulation of community collective efficacy , 2012, Computational and Mathematical Organization Theory.

[39]  Deborah G. . Ancona,et al.  Time: A New Research Lens , 2001 .

[40]  R. Calantone,et al.  When Should RD&E and Marketing Collaborate? The Moderating Role of Exploration–Exploitation and Environmental Uncertainty , 2012 .

[41]  Angelo Cangelosi,et al.  Computersimulation:anewscientific Approachtothestudyoflanguageevolution Anewapproachtothestudyoflanguage Evolution:computersimulation , 2001 .

[42]  R. Calantone,et al.  New Product Activities and Performance: The Moderating Role of Environmental Hostility , 1997 .

[43]  K. Atuahene–Gima,et al.  An exploratory analysis of the impact of market orientation on new product performance a contingency approach , 1995 .

[44]  J. Birkinshaw,et al.  THE ANTECEDENTS, CONSEQUENCES AND MEDIATING ROLE OF ORGANIZATIONAL AMBIDEXTERITY , 2004 .

[45]  Ram Mudambi,et al.  Knowing when to leap: Transitioning between exploitative and explorative R&D , 2014 .

[46]  Zhang-sheng Jiang,et al.  Game analysis of technology innovation alliance stability based on knowledge transfer , 2011, Computational and Mathematical Organization Theory.

[47]  Steven F. Railsback,et al.  Agent-Based and Individual-Based Modeling: A Practical Introduction , 2011 .

[48]  Ram Mudambi,et al.  Proactive R&D management and firm growth: A punctuated equilibrium model , 2011 .

[49]  Irem Demirkan,et al.  The Performance Consequences of Ambidexterity in Strategic Alliance Formations: Empirical Investigation and Computational Theorizing , 2007, Manag. Sci..

[50]  Henk W. Volberda,et al.  Exploratory Innovation, Exploitative Innovation and Peformance: Effects of Organizational Antecedents and Environmental Moderators , 2006, Manag. Sci..

[51]  Steven O. Kimbrough,et al.  On Empirical Validation of Compactness Measures for Electoral Redistricting and Its Significance for Application of Models in the Social Sciences , 2014 .

[52]  Stefano Tarantola,et al.  Sensitivity Analysis in Practice: A Guide to Assessing Scientific Models , 2004 .

[53]  Constantine Andriopoulos,et al.  Exploitation-Exploration Tensions and Organizational Ambidexterity: Managing Paradoxes of Innovation , 2009, Organ. Sci..

[54]  Roger J. Calantone,et al.  Adding Interpersonal Learning and Tacit Knowledge to March's Exploration-Exploitation Model , 2006 .

[55]  K. Atuahene–Gima,et al.  Resolving the Capability–Rigidity Paradox in New Product Innovation , 2005 .

[56]  Kenneth B. Kahn,et al.  PERSPECTIVE: Trends and Drivers of Success in NPD Practices: Results of the 2003 PDMA Best Practices Study* , 2009 .

[57]  John R. Hauser,et al.  Defensive Marketing Strategies , 2008, Mark. Sci..

[58]  M. Lubatkin,et al.  Ambidexterity and Performance in Small-to Medium-Sized Firms: The Pivotal Role of Top Management Team Behavioral Integration , 2006 .

[59]  Marianne W. Lewis,et al.  Managing Innovation Paradoxes: Ambidexterity Lessons from Leading Product Design Companies , 2010 .

[60]  Henk W. Volberda,et al.  Understanding Variation in Managers' Ambidexterity: Investigating Direct and Interaction Effects of Formal Structural and Personal Coordination Mechanisms , 2009, Organ. Sci..

[61]  Kathleen M. Carley,et al.  Comparing hiring strategies in a committee with similarity biases , 2014, Comput. Math. Organ. Theory.

[62]  Roger Calantone,et al.  The Role of Knowledge in Resource Allocation to Exploration versus Exploitation in Technologically Oriented Organizations , 2003, Decis. Sci..

[63]  P. Taylor,et al.  Evolutionarily Stable Strategies and Game Dynamics , 1978 .

[64]  R. Calantone,et al.  New Product Success: Is It Really Controllable by Managers in Highly Turbulent Environments? , 2008 .

[65]  William Rand,et al.  An Introduction to Agent-Based Modeling: Modeling Natural, Social, and Engineered Complex Systems with NetLogo , 2015 .

[66]  Charles M. Macal,et al.  Managing Business Complexity: Discovering Strategic Solutions with Agent-Based Modeling and Simulation , 2007 .

[67]  Henk W. Volberda,et al.  Structural Differentiation and Ambidexterity: The Mediating Role of Integration Mechanisms , 2008, Organ. Sci..

[68]  Christina Fang,et al.  Balancing Exploration and Exploitation through Structural Design: The Isolation of Subgroups and Organization Learning , 2008 .

[69]  Mooweon Rhee,et al.  Exploration and Exploitation , 2016 .

[70]  Bernard J. Jaworski,et al.  Market orientation: Antecedents and consequences , 1993 .

[71]  Pankaj C. Patel,et al.  Walking the Tightrope: An Assessment of the Relationship between High-Performance Work Systems and Organizational Ambidexterity , 2013 .