EEG correlates of categorical and graded face perception

Face perception is a critical social ability and identifying its neural correlates is important from both basic and applied perspectives. In EEG recordings, faces elicit a distinct electrophysiological signature, the N170, which has a larger amplitude and shorter latency in response to faces compared to other objects. However, determining the face specificity of any neural marker for face perception hinges on finding an appropriate control stimulus. We used a novel stimulus set consisting of 300 images that spanned a continuum between random patches of natural scenes and genuine faces, in order to explore the selectivity of face-sensitive ERP responses with a model-based parametric stimulus set. Critically, our database contained "false alarm" images that were misclassified as face by computational face-detection system and varied in their image-level similarity to real faces. High-density (128-channel) event-related potentials (ERPs) were recorded while 23 adult subjects viewed all 300 images in random order, and determined whether each image was a face or non-face. The goal of our analyses was to determine the extent to which a gradient of sensitivity to face-like structure was evident in the ERP signal. Traditional waveform analyses revealed that the N170 component over occipitotemporal electrodes was larger in amplitude for faces compared to all non-faces, even those that were high in image similarity to faces, suggesting strict selectivity for veridical face stimuli. By contrast, single-trial classification of the entire waveform measured at the same sensors revealed that misclassifications of non-face patterns as faces increased with image-level similarity to faces. These results suggest that individual components may exhibit steep selectivity, but integration of multiple waveform features may afford graded information regarding stimulus appearance.

[1]  Charles A Nelson,et al.  An ERP study of emotional face processing in the adult and infant brain. , 2007, Child development.

[2]  N. Sagiv,et al.  Structural Encoding of Human and Schematic Faces: Holistic and Part-Based Processes , 2001, Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience.

[3]  T. Allison,et al.  Electrophysiological Studies of Face Perception in Humans , 1996, Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience.

[4]  M. Tarr,et al.  The N170 occipito‐temporal component is delayed and enhanced to inverted faces but not to inverted objects: an electrophysiological account of face‐specific processes in the human brain , 2000, Neuroreport.

[5]  Eli Brenner,et al.  Flexibility in intercepting moving objects. , 2007, Journal of vision.

[6]  S. Baron-Cohen,et al.  Seeing face-like objects: an event-related potential study , 2009, Neuroreport.

[7]  S. Bentin,et al.  Meaningful processing of meaningless stimuli: The influence of perceptual experience on early visual processing of faces , 2002, Cognition.

[8]  Sean M. Polyn,et al.  Beyond mind-reading: multi-voxel pattern analysis of fMRI data , 2006, Trends in Cognitive Sciences.

[9]  M Eimer,et al.  Does the face‐specific N170 component reflect the activity of a specialized eye processor? , 1998, Neuroreport.

[10]  M. Eimer ATTENTIONAL MODULATIONS OF EVENT-RELATED BRAIN POTENTIALS SENSITIVE TO FACES , 2000, Cognitive neuropsychology.

[11]  J. Davidoff,et al.  Brain events related to normal and moderately scrambled faces. , 1996, Brain research. Cognitive brain research.

[12]  B. Renault,et al.  Electrophysiological correlates of facial decision: insights from upright and upside-down Mooney-face perception. , 2005, Brain research. Cognitive brain research.

[13]  I. Biederman,et al.  Tuning for shape dimensions in macaque inferior temporal cortex , 2005, The European journal of neuroscience.

[14]  Bruno Rossion,et al.  Early lateralization and orientation tuning for face, word, and object processing in the visual cortex , 2003, NeuroImage.

[15]  Gaurav Singal,et al.  Neural correlates of categorical face perception , 2010 .

[16]  Margot J. Taylor,et al.  Inversion and Contrast Polarity Reversal Affect both Encoding and Recognition Processes of Unfamiliar Faces: A Repetition Study Using ERPs , 2002, NeuroImage.

[17]  Hideko F. Norman,et al.  Aging and the cross modal perception of natural object shape , 2005 .

[18]  K. Linkenkaer-Hansen,et al.  Face-selective processing in human extrastriate cortex around 120 ms after stimulus onset revealed by magneto- and electroencephalography , 1998, Neuroscience Letters.

[19]  Margot J. Taylor,et al.  Early processing of the six basic facial emotional expressions. , 2003, Brain research. Cognitive brain research.

[20]  K. Bötzel,et al.  Scalp topography and analysis of intracranial sources of face-evoked potentials , 2004, Experimental Brain Research.

[21]  David D. Cox,et al.  Functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI) “brain reading”: detecting and classifying distributed patterns of fMRI activity in human visual cortex , 2003, NeuroImage.

[22]  A. L. Humphrey,et al.  Kernel- and model-based predictions of grating responses in monkey and cat visual cortex , 2004 .

[23]  Axel Mecklinger,et al.  Priming Visual Face-Processing Mechanisms: Electrophysiological Evidence , 2002, Psychological science.

[24]  C. Jacques,et al.  The time course of the inversion effect during individual face discrimination. , 2007, Journal of vision.

[25]  Takeo Kanade,et al.  Neural Network-Based Face Detection , 1998, IEEE Trans. Pattern Anal. Mach. Intell..

[26]  J. Shedden,et al.  Automatic face identity encoding at the N170 , 2006, Vision Research.

[27]  L. Deouell,et al.  STRUCTURAL ENCODING AND IDENTIFICATION IN FACE PROCESSING: ERP EVIDENCE FOR SEPARATE MECHANISMS , 2000, Cognitive neuropsychology.

[28]  B. Rossion,et al.  ERP evidence for the speed of face categorization in the human brain: Disentangling the contribution of low-level visual cues from face perception , 2011, Vision Research.

[29]  Bruno Rossion,et al.  Early electrophysiological responses to multiple face orientations correlate with individual discrimination performance in humans , 2007, NeuroImage.

[30]  C. Jacques,et al.  The Speed of Individual Face Categorization , 2006, Psychological science.

[31]  A. Ishai,et al.  Distributed and Overlapping Representations of Faces and Objects in Ventral Temporal Cortex , 2001, Science.

[32]  Margot J. Taylor,et al.  Eyes first! Eye processing develops before face processing in children , 2001, Neuroreport.

[33]  Roxane J. Itier,et al.  Face, eye and object early processing: What is the face specificity? , 2006, NeuroImage.

[34]  Margot J. Taylor,et al.  N170 or N1? Spatiotemporal differences between object and face processing using ERPs. , 2004, Cerebral cortex.

[35]  Jesse S. Husk,et al.  Spatial scaling factors explain eccentricity effects on face ERPs. , 2005, Journal of vision.

[36]  Guillaume A. Rousselet,et al.  Single-trial EEG dynamics of object and face visual processing , 2007, NeuroImage.

[37]  Michèle Fabre-Thorpe,et al.  Animal and human faces in natural scenes: How specific to human faces is the N170 ERP component? , 2004, Journal of vision.