Indirect augmented reality

Developing augmented reality (AR) applications for mobile devices and outdoor environments has historically required a number of technical trade-offs related to tracking. One approach is to rely on computer vision which provides very accurate tracking, but can be brittle, and limits the generality of the application. Another approach is to rely on sensor-based tracking which enables widespread use, but at the cost of generally poor tracking performance. In this paper we present and evaluate a new approach, which we call Indirect AR, that enables perfect alignment of virtual content in a much greater number of application scenarios. To achieve this improved performance we replace the live camera view used in video see through AR with a previously captured panoramic image. By doing this we improve the perceived quality of the tracking while still maintaining a similar overall experience. There are some limitations of this technique, however, related to the use of panoramas. We evaluate these boundaries conditions on both a performance and experiential basis through two user studies. The result of these studies indicates that users preferred Indirect AR over traditional AR in most conditions, and when conditions do degrade to the point the experience changes, Indirect AR can still be a very useful tool in many outdoor application scenarios.

[1]  G. Liestol Augmented reality and digital genre design — Situated simulations on the iPhone , 2009, 2009 IEEE International Symposium on Mixed and Augmented Reality - Arts, Media and Humanities.

[2]  Benjamin Lok,et al.  A mixed reality approach for interactively blending dynamic models with corresponding physical phenomena , 2010, TOMC.

[3]  Blair MacIntyre,et al.  KHARMA: An open KML/HTML architecture for mobile augmented reality applications , 2010, 2010 IEEE International Symposium on Mixed and Augmented Reality.

[4]  Tomohiro Tanikawa,et al.  Virtual 3D World Construction by Inter-connecting Photograph-based 3D Models , 2008, 2008 IEEE Virtual Reality Conference.

[5]  Blair MacIntyre,et al.  Experiences with an AR evaluation test bed: Presence, performance, and physiological measurement , 2010, 2010 IEEE International Symposium on Mixed and Augmented Reality.

[6]  Hong Hua,et al.  Magic Lenses for augmented virtual environments , 2006, IEEE Computer Graphics and Applications.

[7]  Dieter Schmalstieg,et al.  Real-time panoramic mapping and tracking on mobile phones , 2010, 2010 IEEE Virtual Reality Conference (VR).

[8]  Dieter Schmalstieg,et al.  Real-Time Detection and Tracking for Augmented Reality on Mobile Phones , 2010, IEEE Transactions on Visualization and Computer Graphics.

[9]  Mel Slater,et al.  A Virtual Presence Counter , 2000, Presence: Teleoperators & Virtual Environments.

[10]  Ann Morrison,et al.  On the Role of Presence in Mixed Reality , 2009, PRESENCE: Teleoperators and Virtual Environments.

[11]  Volker Scholz,et al.  An Augmented Reality museum guide , 2008, 2008 7th IEEE/ACM International Symposium on Mixed and Augmented Reality.

[12]  Katsushi Ikeuchi,et al.  Arbitrary view position and direction rendering for large-scale scenes , 2000, Proceedings IEEE Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition. CVPR 2000 (Cat. No.PR00662).

[13]  Benjamin Lok,et al.  A Mixed Reality Approach for Merging Abstract and Concrete Knowledge , 2008, 2008 IEEE Virtual Reality Conference.

[14]  R. Logie,et al.  The Role of Perspective in Locating Position in a Real-World, Unfamiliar Environment , 2003 .

[15]  Yun-Ta Tsai,et al.  The Westwood Experience: Connecting story to locations via Mixed Reality , 2010, 2010 IEEE International Symposium on Mixed and Augmented Reality - Arts, Media, and Humanities.

[16]  Richard Szeliski,et al.  Image-based interactive exploration of real-world environments , 2004, IEEE Computer Graphics and Applications.

[17]  Mark A. Livingston,et al.  The effect of registration error on tracking distant augmented objects , 2008, 2008 7th IEEE/ACM International Symposium on Mixed and Augmented Reality.

[18]  Michael J. Singer,et al.  Measuring Presence in Virtual Environments: A Presence Questionnaire , 1998, Presence.

[19]  Daphna Weinshall,et al.  Mosaicing New Views: The Crossed-Slits Projection , 2003, IEEE Trans. Pattern Anal. Mach. Intell..

[20]  Tobias Höllerer,et al.  Simulation of Augmented Reality Systems in Purely Virtual Environments , 2009, 2009 IEEE Virtual Reality Conference.

[21]  George Papagiannakis,et al.  Believability and Presence in Mobile Mixed Reality Environments , 2005 .

[22]  Andy Cockburn,et al.  Through the looking glass: the use of lenses as an interface tool for Augmented Reality interfaces , 2004, GRAPHITE '04.