Benefits of "concreteness fading" for children's mathematics understanding *

Children often struggle to gain understanding from instruction on a procedure, particularly when it is taught in the context of abstract mathematical symbols. We tested whether a “concreteness fading” technique, which begins with concrete materials and fades to abstract symbols, can help children extend their knowledge beyond a simple instructed procedure. In Experiment 1, children with low prior knowledge received instruction in one of four conditions: (a) concrete, (b) abstract, (c) concreteness fading, or (d) concreteness introduction. Experiment 2 was designed to rule out an alternative hypothesis that concreteness fading works merely by “warming up” children for abstract instruction. Experiment 3 tested whether the benefits of concreteness fading extend to children with high prior knowledge. In all three experiments, children in the concreteness fading condition exhibited better transfer than children in the other conditions. Children's understanding benefits when problems are presented with concrete materials that are faded into abstract representations.

[1]  A. Agresti An introduction to categorical data analysis , 1997 .

[2]  Percival G. Matthews,et al.  Organization matters: Mental organization of addition knowledge relates to understanding math equivalence in symbolic form , 2014 .

[3]  Robert L. Goldstone,et al.  The Transfer of Scientific Principles Using Concrete and Idealized Simulations , 2005, Journal of the Learning Sciences.

[4]  Lieven Verschaffel,et al.  Symbolizing, modeling and tool use in mathematics education , 2002 .

[5]  Nicole M. McNeil U-shaped development in math: 7-year-olds outperform 9-year-olds on equivalence problems. , 2007, Developmental psychology.

[6]  Enrique Castro,et al.  Elementary Students' Understanding of the Equal Sign in Number Sentences. , 2017 .

[7]  T. N. Carraher,et al.  Computation Routines Prescribed by Schools: Help or Hindrance?. , 1985 .

[8]  Arthur J. Baroody,et al.  The Effects of Instruction on Children's Understanding of the "Equals" Sign , 1983, The Elementary School Journal.

[9]  Susan P. Miller,et al.  Fraction Instruction for Students with Mathematics Disabilities: Comparing Two Teaching Sequences , 2003 .

[10]  Lieven Verschaffel,et al.  Children's solution processes in elementary arithmetic problems: Analysis and improvement. , 1981 .

[11]  Robert L. Goldstone,et al.  Concreteness Fading in Mathematics and Science Instruction: a Systematic Review , 2014 .

[12]  Jennifer A. Kaminski,et al.  The advantage of simple symbols for learning and transfer , 2005, Psychonomic bulletin & review.

[13]  J. Sherman,et al.  Equivalence in symbolic and nonsymbolic contexts: Benefits of solving problems with manipulatives. , 2009 .

[14]  A. Glenberg,et al.  Enhancing comprehension in small reading groups using a manipulation strategy , 2007 .

[15]  L. Cronbach,et al.  Aptitudes and instructional methods: A handbook for research on interactions , 1977 .

[16]  B. Rittle-Johnson,et al.  Promoting transfer: effects of self-explanation and direct instruction. , 2006, Child development.

[17]  Robert L. Goldstone,et al.  Connecting instances to promote children's relational reasoning. , 2011, Journal of experimental child psychology.

[18]  Robert M. Capraro,et al.  Sources of Differences in Children's Understandings of Mathematical Equality: Comparative Analysis of Teacher Guides and Student Texts in China and the United States , 2008 .

[19]  Percival G. Matthews,et al.  In pursuit of knowledge: comparing self-explanations, concepts, and procedures as pedagogical tools. , 2009, Journal of experimental child psychology.

[20]  Vladimir M Sloutsky,et al.  The Advantage of Abstract Examples in Learning Math , 2008, Science.

[21]  T. P. Carpenter,et al.  Children's Understanding of Equality: A Foundation for Algebra , 1999 .

[22]  Emily R. Fyfe,et al.  “Concreteness fading” promotes transfer of mathematical knowledge , 2012 .

[23]  Linda Jarvin,et al.  When Theories Don't Add Up: Disentangling he Manipulatives Debate , 2007 .

[24]  Martha W. Alibali,et al.  Does Understanding the Equal Sign Matter? Evidence from Solving Equations , 2006 .

[25]  Susan Goldin-Meadow,et al.  Transitional knowledge in the acquisition of concepts , 1988 .

[26]  Martha W. Alibali,et al.  Learning Mathematics from Procedural Instruction: Externally Imposed Goals Influence What Is Learned. , 2000 .

[27]  T. P. Carpenter,et al.  Children's Conceptual Structures for Multidigit Numbers and Methods of Multidigit Addition and Subtraction. , 1997 .

[28]  Arthur M. Glenberg,et al.  Using Concreteness in Education: Real Problems, Potential Solutions , 2009 .

[29]  M. Inglis,et al.  Teaching the substitutive conception of the equals sign , 2013 .

[30]  M. Alibali How children change their minds: strategy change can be gradual or abrupt. , 1999, Developmental psychology.

[31]  Vladimir M. Sloutsky,et al.  Transfer of Mathematical Knowledge: The Portability of Generic Instantiations , 2009 .

[32]  H. Simon,et al.  Why are some problems hard? Evidence from Tower of Hanoi , 1985, Cognitive Psychology.

[33]  Nicole M. McNeil,et al.  Why won't you change your mind? Knowledge of operational patterns hinders learning and performance on equations. , 2005, Child development.

[34]  Kenneth D. Forbus,et al.  The Roles of Similarity in Transfer: Separating Retrievability From Inferential Soundness , 1993, Cognitive Psychology.

[35]  R. Reeve,et al.  Profiles of Algebraic Competence. , 2008 .

[36]  S. Goldin-Meadow,et al.  Gesturing makes learning last , 2008, Cognition.

[37]  John R. Anderson,et al.  The Transfer of Cognitive Skill , 1989 .

[38]  D. Gentner,et al.  Respects for similarity , 1993 .

[39]  Emily R. Fyfe,et al.  Benefits of practicing 4 = 2 + 2: nontraditional problem formats facilitate children's understanding of mathematical equivalence. , 2011, Child development.

[40]  R. Leeper A Study of a Neglected Portion of the Field of Learning—the Development of Sensory Organization , 1935 .

[41]  J. Bruner Toward a Theory of Instruction , 1966 .

[42]  B. Rittle-Johnson,et al.  Conceptual and procedural knowledge of mathematics: Does one lead to the other? , 1999 .

[43]  T. P. Carpenter,et al.  Professional development focused on children's algebraic reasoning in elementary school , 2007 .

[44]  Marci S. DeCaro,et al.  The Effects of Feedback During Exploratory Mathematics Problem Solving: Prior Knowledge Matters , 2012 .

[45]  L. Schauble,et al.  Symbolic communication in mathematics and science: Co-constituting inscription and thought. , 2002 .

[46]  Robert L. Goldstone,et al.  The transfer of abstract principles governing complex adaptive systems , 2003, Cognitive Psychology.

[47]  K.P.E. Gravemeijer,et al.  Preamble: From Models to Modeling , 2002 .

[48]  Mitchell J. Nathan,et al.  The Real Story Behind Story Problems: Effects of Representations on Quantitative Reasoning , 2004 .

[49]  Michelle Perry,et al.  Learning and Transfer: Instructional Conditions and Conceptual Change , 1991 .

[50]  A. Renkl,et al.  How Effective are Instructional Explanations in Example-Based Learning? A Meta-Analytic Review , 2010 .

[51]  Percival G. Matthews,et al.  It Pays to be Organized: Organizing Arithmetic Practice Around Equivalent Values Facilitates Understanding of Math Equivalence , 2012 .

[52]  Eric A. Jenkins,et al.  How Children Discover New Strategies , 1989 .

[53]  David W. Carraher,et al.  Mathematics in the streets and in schools , 1985 .

[54]  Daniel L. Schwartz,et al.  Physically Distributed Learning: Adapting and Reinterpreting Physical Environments in the Development of Fraction Concepts , 2005, Cogn. Sci..

[55]  A. Sáenz-Ludlow,et al.  Third Graders' Interpretations of Equality and the Equal Symbol , 1998 .

[56]  Michelle Perry,et al.  Activation of Real-World Knowledge in the Solution of Word Problems , 1989 .

[57]  Karen B. Givvin,et al.  Teaching Mathematics in Seven Countries: Results From the TIMSS 1999 Video Study , 2003 .