Guidelines for standardization of radiostereometry (RSA) of implants

There is a need for standardization of radiostereometric (RSA) investigations to facilitate comparison of outcome reported from different research groups. In this document, 6 research centers have agreed upon standards for terminology, description and use of RSA arrangement including radiographic set-up and techniques. Consensus regarding minimum requirements for marker stability and scatter, choice of coordinate systems, and preferred way of describing prosthetic micromotion is of special interest. Some notes on data interpretation are also presented. Validation of RSA should be standardized by preparation of protocols for assessment of accuracy and precision. Practical issues related to loading of the joint by weight bearing or other conditions, follow-up intervals, length of follow-up, radiation dose, and the exclusion of patients due to technical errors are considered. Finally, we present a checklist of standardized output that should be included in any clinical RSA paper. This document will form the basis of a detailed standardization protocol under supervision of ISO and the European Standards Working Group on Joint Replacement Implants (CEN/TC 285/WG4). This protocol will facilitate inclusion of RSA in a standard protocol for implant testing before it is released for general use. Such a protocol—also including other recognized clinical outcome parameters—will reduce the risk of implanting potentially inferior prostheses on a large scale.

[1]  E R Valstar,et al.  Fast and accurate automated measurements in digitized stereophotogrammetric radiographs. , 1998, Journal of biomechanics.

[2]  L Ryd,et al.  Roentgen stereophotogrammetric analysis of prosthetic fixation in the hip and knee joint. , 1992, Clinical orthopaedics and related research.

[3]  David W. Murray,et al.  Cement migration after THR , 1999 .

[4]  E R Valstar,et al.  A new model-based RSA method validated using CAD models and models from reversed engineering. , 2003, Journal of biomechanics.

[5]  G. Selvik Roentgen stereophotogrammetry. A method for the study of the kinematics of the skeletal system. , 1989, Acta orthopaedica Scandinavica. Supplementum.

[6]  J. Kärrholm,et al.  Stability of femoral neck fracture. Roentgen stereophotogrammetry of 29 hook-pinned fractures. , 1991, Acta orthopaedica Scandinavica.

[7]  J. Kärrholm,et al.  Increased varus-valgus tilting of screw-fixated knee prostheses. Stereoradiographic study of uncemented versus cemented tibial components. , 1993, The Journal of arthroplasty.

[8]  Johan Kärrholm,et al.  In vivo kinematics of total knee arthroplasty , 2000 .

[9]  Aivars Berzins,et al.  Accuracy and precision of radiostereometric analysis in the measurement of THR femoral component translations: human and canine in vitro models , 2001, Journal of orthopaedic research : official publication of the Orthopaedic Research Society.

[10]  J. Kärrholm,et al.  Longitudinal Growth of the Distal Fibula in Children with Slipped Capital Femoral Epiphysis , 1986, Journal of pediatric orthopedics.

[11]  S. Toksvig-Larsen,et al.  Early postoperative fixation of tibial components: An in vivo roentgen stereophotogrammetric analysis , 1993, Journal of orthopaedic research : official publication of the Orthopaedic Research Society.

[12]  J. Kärrholm,et al.  Does early micromotion of femoral stem prostheses matter? 4-7-year stereoradiographic follow-up of 84 cemented prostheses. , 1994, The Journal of bone and joint surgery. British volume.

[13]  D W Murray,et al.  Roentgen Stereophotogrammetric Analysis for Assessing Migration of Total Hip Replacement Femoral Components , 1995, Proceedings of the Institution of Mechanical Engineers. Part H, Journal of engineering in medicine.

[14]  L Ryd,et al.  Accurate accuracy assessment: review of basic principles. , 1999, Acta orthopaedica Scandinavica.

[15]  J Kärrholm,et al.  Roentgen stereophotogrammetry. Review of orthopedic applications. , 1989, Acta orthopaedica Scandinavica.

[16]  D W Murray,et al.  In vivo measurement of total knee replacement wear. , 2004, The Knee.

[17]  Johan Kärrholm,et al.  Kinematics of successful knee prostheses during weight-bearing: Three-dimensional movements and positions of screw axes in the Tricon-M and Miller-Galante designs , 2005, Knee Surgery, Sports Traumatology, Arthroscopy.

[18]  J Kärrholm,et al.  Radiostereometry of hip prostheses. Review of methodology and clinical results. , 1997, Clinical orthopaedics and related research.

[19]  I Söderkvist,et al.  Determining the movements of the skeleton using well-configured markers. , 1993, Journal of biomechanics.

[20]  D W Murray,et al.  Cement migration after THR. A comparison of charnley elite and exeter femoral stems using RSA. , 1999, The Journal of bone and joint surgery. British volume.

[21]  R. Johnsson,et al.  Radiostereometric analysis in hip revision surgery-optimal time for index examination: 6 patients revised with impacted allografts and cement followed weekly for 6 weeks , 2000, Acta orthopaedica Scandinavica.

[22]  L Ryd,et al.  Methods for determining the accuracy of radiostereometric analysis (RSA) , 2000, Acta orthopaedica Scandinavica.

[23]  M. Pearcy Stereo radiography of lumbar spine motion. , 1985, Acta orthopaedica Scandinavica. Supplementum.

[24]  S. Toksvig-Larsen,et al.  Roentgen stereophotogrammetric analysis as a predictor of mechanical loosening of knee prostheses. , 1995, The Journal of bone and joint surgery. British volume.

[25]  Niclas Börlin,et al.  The precision of radiostereometric measurements. Manual vs. digital measurements. , 2002, Journal of biomechanics.

[26]  Niclas Börlin,et al.  Experimental assessment of precision and accuracy of radiostereometric analysis for the determination of polyethylene wear in a total hip replacement model , 2002, Journal of orthopaedic research : official publication of the Orthopaedic Research Society.

[27]  G Selvik,et al.  Roentgen Stereophotogrammetric Analysis , 1990, Acta radiologica.

[28]  S Toksvig-Larsen,et al.  Roentgen stereophotogrammetric analysis using computer-based image-analysis. , 1997, Journal of biomechanics.

[29]  L Ryd,et al.  Micromotion in knee arthroplasty. A roentgen stereophotogrammetric analysis of tibial component fixation. , 1986, Acta orthopaedica Scandinavica. Supplementum.

[30]  E. Valstar,et al.  Factors associated with excessive migration in bone impaction hip revision surgery: a radiostereometric analysis study. , 2002, The Journal of arthroplasty.

[31]  P. Herberts,et al.  Tibial component fixation in porous- and hydroxyapatite-coated total knee arthroplasty: a radiostereo metric evaluation of migration and inducible displacement after 5 years. , 2000, The Journal of arthroplasty.

[32]  L Ryd,et al.  Digital automated RSA compared to manually operated RSA. , 2000, Journal of biomechanics.

[33]  E R Valstar,et al.  Model-based Roentgen stereophotogrammetry of orthopaedic implants. , 2001, Journal of biomechanics.

[34]  P. Wedin,et al.  On condition numbers and algorithms for determining a rigid body movement , 1994 .

[35]  J Kärrholm,et al.  In vivo kinematics of total knee arthroplasty. Concave versus posterior-stabilised tibial joint surface. , 2000, The Journal of bone and joint surgery. British volume.

[36]  G Selvik,et al.  Mobility of the Lower Lumbar Spine After Posterolateral Fusion Determined by Roentgen Stereophotogrammetric Analysis , 1990, Spine.