Self-Adapting Variable Impedance Actuator Control for Precision and Dynamic Tasks

Variable impedance actuators (VIAs) as tool devices for teleoperation could extend the range of tasks that humans can perform through a teleoperated robot by mimicking the change of upper limb stiffness that humans perform for different tasks, increasing the dynamic range of the robot. This requires appropriate impedance control. Goal of this study is to show the effectiveness of a controller that does not require additional sensors, reducing system complexity and increasing ease of use. The controller should allow to perform precise positioning tasks and dynamic tasks like hammering through teleoperation with a VIA tool device automatically adapting the impedance setting of the VIA. This is achieved by a control law according to the principle "slow-stiff/fast-soft". The controller was tested in a human user study with 24 participants comparing the human-machine performance with the self-adapting controller in a bilateral telemanipulation experiment with two tasks (precision/dynamic) using three impedance settings (high/low/adaptive impedance). The results indicate that the proposed system performs equally well as state of the art stiff teleoperation devices for precision tasks, while having benefits in terms of increased safety and reduced wear for dynamic tasks. This is a step towards teleoperation with a wide dynamic range.

[1]  Septimiu E. Salcudean,et al.  Analysis of Control Architectures for Teleoperation Systems with Impedance/Admittance Master and Slave Manipulators , 2001, Int. J. Robotics Res..

[2]  Günter Niemeyer,et al.  Real-time estimation of human impedance for haptic interfaces , 2009, World Haptics 2009 - Third Joint EuroHaptics conference and Symposium on Haptic Interfaces for Virtual Environment and Teleoperator Systems.

[3]  Thomas F. Edgar,et al.  Process Dynamics and Control , 1989 .

[4]  Giorgio Grioli,et al.  Variable Stiffness Actuators: Review on Design and Components , 2016, IEEE/ASME Transactions on Mechatronics.

[5]  Stefan Schaal,et al.  Variable Impedance Control - A Reinforcement Learning Approach , 2010, Robotics: Science and Systems.

[6]  Andre Schiele,et al.  Increasing Impact by Mechanical Resonance for Teleoperated Hammering , 2018, IEEE Transactions on Haptics.

[7]  Nikolaos G. Tsagarakis,et al.  Variable impedance actuators: Moving the robots of tomorrow , 2012, 2012 IEEE/RSJ International Conference on Intelligent Robots and Systems.

[8]  Darwin G. Caldwell,et al.  Towards versatile legged robots through active impedance control , 2015, Int. J. Robotics Res..

[9]  Manuel Aiple,et al.  Towards teleoperation with human-like dynamics: Human use of elastic tools , 2017, 2017 IEEE World Haptics Conference (WHC).

[10]  F. Wilcoxon Individual Comparisons by Ranking Methods , 1945 .

[11]  Stefano Stramigioli,et al.  Intuitive Impedance Modulation in Haptic Control Using Electromyography , 2018, 2018 7th IEEE International Conference on Biomedical Robotics and Biomechatronics (Biorob).

[12]  Manuel G. Catalano,et al.  Variable impedance actuators: A review , 2013, Robotics Auton. Syst..

[13]  野間 春生,et al.  Symposium on Haptic Interfaces for Virtual Environment and Teleoperator Systems 参加報告 , 1997 .

[14]  Günter Niemeyer,et al.  User-controlled variable impedance teleoperation , 2010, 2010 IEEE International Conference on Robotics and Automation.

[15]  Jerry E. Pratt,et al.  Stiffness Isn't Everything , 1995, ISER.

[16]  Antonio Bicchi,et al.  Fast and "soft-arm" tactics [robot arm design] , 2004, IEEE Robotics & Automation Magazine.

[17]  Andre Schiele,et al.  A Dynamic Robotic Actuator with Variable Physical Stiffness and Damping. , 2019 .

[18]  N. Hogan Adaptive control of mechanical impedance by coactivation of antagonist muscles , 1984 .

[19]  Sethu Vijayakumar,et al.  Optimal variable stiffness control: formulation and application to explosive movement tasks , 2012, Auton. Robots.