Smoothness maximization along a predefined path accurately predicts the speed profiles of complex arm movements.

The speed profiles of arm movements display a number of regularities, including bell-shaped speed profiles in straight reaching movements and an inverse relationship between speed and curvature in extemporaneous drawing movements (described as a 2/3 power law). Here we propose a new model that simultaneously accounts for both regularities by replacing the 2/3 power law with a smoothness constraint. For a given path of the hand in space, our model assumes that the speed profile will be the one that minimizes the third derivative of position (or "jerk"). Analysis of the mathematical relationship between this smoothness constraint and the 2/3 power law revealed that in both two and three dimensions, the power law is equivalent to setting the jerk along the normal to the path to zero; it generates speed predictions that are similar, but clearly distinguishable from the predictions of our model. We have assessed the accuracy of the model on a number of motor tasks in two and three dimensions, involving discrete movements along arbitrary paths, traced with different limb segments. The new model provides a very close fit to the observed speed profiles in all cases. Its performance is uniformly better compared with all existing versions of the 2/3 power law, suggesting that the correlation between speed and curvature may be a consequence of an underlying motor strategy to produce smooth movements. Our results indicate that the relationship between the path and the speed profile of a complex arm movement is stronger than previously thought, especially within a single trial. The accuracy of the model was quite uniform over movements of different shape, size, and average speed. We did not find evidence for segmentation, yet prediction error increased with movement duration, suggesting a continuous fluctuation of the "tempo" of discrete movements. The implications of these findings for motor planning and on-line control are discussed.

[1]  Frank E. Pollick,et al.  Constant Affine Velocity Predicts the 1/3 Power Law of Drawing and Planar Motion Perception , 1995 .

[2]  P. Viviani,et al.  A developmental study of the relationship between geometry and kinematics in drawing movements. , 1991, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[3]  J. F. Soechting,et al.  An algorithm for the generation of curvilinear wrist motion in an arbitrary plane in three-dimensional space , 1986, Neuroscience.

[4]  T. Flash,et al.  The coordination of arm movements: an experimentally confirmed mathematical model , 1985, The Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience.

[5]  J. Soechting,et al.  Organization of arm movements in three-dimensional space. Wrist motion is piecewise planar , 1987, Neuroscience.

[6]  W R Jack,et al.  VII. On the analysis of voluntary muscular movements by certain new instruments , 1895, Proceedings of the Royal Society of London.

[7]  N. Hogan,et al.  Does the nervous system use equilibrium-point control to guide single and multiple joint movements? , 1992, The Behavioral and brain sciences.

[8]  T. Flash,et al.  Moving gracefully: quantitative theories of motor coordination , 1987, Trends in Neurosciences.

[9]  A. Wing,et al.  Relation between velocity and curvature in movement: equivalence and divergence between a power law and a minimum-jerk model. , 1988, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[10]  William R. Jack.  On the Analysis of Voluntary Muscular Movements by Certain New Instruments. [Abstract] , 1894 .

[11]  C. Atkeson,et al.  Kinematic features of unrestrained vertical arm movements , 1985, The Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience.

[12]  D. Ostry,et al.  Origins of the power law relation between movement velocity and curvature: modeling the effects of muscle mechanics and limb dynamics. , 1996, Journal of neurophysiology.

[13]  T. Flash,et al.  Minimum-jerk, two-thirds power law, and isochrony: converging approaches to movement planning. , 1995, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[14]  P. Viviani,et al.  The law relating the kinematic and figural aspects of drawing movements. , 1983, Acta psychologica.

[15]  Mitsuo Kawato,et al.  Equilibrium-Point Control Hypothesis Examined by Measured Arm Stiffness During Multijoint Movement , 1996, Science.

[16]  Michael I. Jordan,et al.  Obstacle Avoidance and a Perturbation Sensitivity Model for Motor Planning , 1997, The Journal of Neuroscience.

[17]  Carl de Boor,et al.  A Practical Guide to Splines , 1978, Applied Mathematical Sciences.

[18]  G. Sapiro,et al.  Constant Affine Velocity Predicts the 1 3 Power Law of Planar Motion Perception and Generation , 1997, Vision Research.

[19]  Philip E. Gill,et al.  Practical optimization , 1981 .

[20]  P Viviani,et al.  Segmentation and coupling in complex movements. , 1985, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.