Visual responses to changing size and to sideways motion for different directions of motion in depth: linearization of visual responses.

This psychophysical study explored one possible basis for visually judging the direction of motion in depth. We propose that the changing-size channels precisely compute the algebraic difference between the velocities of opposite edges of a target, thus extracting the velocity component Vz along a line through the eye independent of the trajectory of the target, so that (with added “jitter”) this computation is accurately independent of the component of motion Vx parallel to the frontoparallel plane over a wide range of Vx:Vz ratios. We have no evidence for a complementary channel that computes Vx independently of Vz over any comparable range of Vx: Vz ratios. Our evidence shows that the oscillations of the edges of our stimulus square were equivalent to the oscillation of the square along one of 11 trajectories in depth. All 11 trajectories had the same value of Vz, but the 11 trajectories had different Vx values. In separate experiments, subjects adapted to each trajectory and we measured threshold elevations for two test oscillations, one equivalent to pure z-direction motion and the other equivalent to pure x-direction motion. To a first approximation, threshold elevations for the z-direction test were the same for all 11 trajectories, with the greatest departure from constancy (30%) when two edges of the adapting stimulus were stationary (i.e., equivalent to trajectories that just grazed the eye). Adding an 8-Hz “jitter” oscillation to the 2-Hz adapting oscillation “linearized” the visual response so that threshold elevations were rendered accurately constant (± 5%) for all trajectories tested.

[1]  M. Cynader,et al.  The visual perception of motion in depth. , 1979, Scientific American.

[2]  D. Regan,et al.  Evidence for the existence of neural mechanisms selectively sensitive to the direction of movement in space , 1973, The Journal of physiology.

[3]  D Regan,et al.  Visually guided locomotion: psychophysical evidence for a neural mechanism sensitive to flow patterns. , 1979, Science.

[4]  D. Regan,et al.  Separable aftereffects of changing-size and motion-in-depth: Different neural mechanisms? , 1979, Vision Research.

[5]  D. Hubel,et al.  Receptive fields, binocular interaction and functional architecture in the cat's visual cortex , 1962, The Journal of physiology.

[6]  M. Cynader,et al.  Neurones in cat parastriate cortex sensitive to the direction of motion in three‐dimensional space , 1978, The Journal of physiology.

[7]  R. Steinman,et al.  Small saccades serve no useful purpose: Reply to a letter by R. W. Ditchburn , 1980, Vision Research.

[8]  D Regan,et al.  The relation between discrimination and sensitivity in the perception of motion in depth. , 1975, The Journal of physiology.

[9]  A. Pantle,et al.  Physiological Basis of Motion Perception , 1978 .

[10]  D. Regan,et al.  Looming detectors in the human visual pathway , 1978, Vision Research.

[11]  D. Regan,et al.  Binocular and monocular stimuli for motion in depth: Changing-disparity and changing-size feed the same motion-in-depth stage , 1979, Vision Research.

[12]  A. A. Skavenski,et al.  Quality of retinal image stabilization during small natural and artificial body rotations in man , 1979, Vision Research.

[13]  H. Barlow,et al.  Evidence for a Physiological Explanation of the Waterfall Phenomenon and Figural After-effects , 1963, Nature.

[14]  D. Regan,et al.  Visual perception of changing size: The effect of object size , 1979, Vision Research.

[15]  A. Pantle,et al.  Velocity-sensitive elements in human vision: initial psychophysical evidence. , 1968, Vision research.

[16]  L. H. Tweel,et al.  Linearization of Evoked Responses to Sine Wave-modulated Light by Noise , 1965, Nature.

[17]  H. Spekreijse,et al.  SIGNAL TRANSPORT AND RECTIFICATION IN THE HUMAN EVOKED‐RESPONSE SYSTEM * , 1969, Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences.

[18]  D Regan,et al.  Visual Sensitivity to the Shape and Size of a Moving Object: Implications for Models of Object Perception , 1980, Perception.

[19]  D. Regan,et al.  Neurons in area 18 of cat visual cortex selectively sensitive to changing size: Nonlinear interactions between responses to two edges , 1979, Vision Research.

[20]  H Spekreijse,et al.  Rectification in the goldfish retina: analysis by sinusoidal and auxiliary stimulation. , 1969, Vision research.

[21]  S. Blomfield Arithmetical operations performed by nerve cells. , 1974, Brain research.