Partners and rivals: a model of international collaboration in advanced technology

Concepts from bargaining theory and neorealist theory are integrated in a partners-and-rivals (PAR) model that explains the terms of collaboration between rational actors (for example, firms) that are potential competitors. The model contends that the stronger player's incentive to collaborate is determined not only by its interest in absolute welfare benefits from collaboration but also by its concern about and loss of utility from unfavorable shifts in relative position vis-a-vis the weaker player. Two propositions are derived from the model. According to the disparity principle, the stronger player's net payoff from collaboration (the sum of its welfare benefits and positional costs) is a function of the disparity in capabilities between the two players. The net payoff curve is low when the disparity in capabilities is large, reaches an optimum when the disparity is moderate, and then falls again as the disparity approaches zero. The slope of the curve is also affected by a coefficient, α, which reflects the stronger player's sensitivity to positional losses. According to the compensation principle, for collaboration to arise, the weaker player must make an adjustment in the terms of the bargain, or a side-payment, to compensate the stronger player for its positional losses from collaboration. The validity of the PAR model is tested by comparing Franco-German collaboration on military aircraft in two cases, one in which the disparity in capabilities between the players was moderate and the other in which the disparity was small.

[1]  Robert Gilpin,et al.  War and change in world politics , 1982 .

[2]  Kenichi Ohmae,et al.  Triad power : the coming shape of global competition , 1985 .

[3]  R. Putnam Diplomacy and domestic politics: the logic of two-level games , 1988, International Organization.

[4]  William H. Flanigan,et al.  The Theory of Political Coalitions. , 1965 .

[5]  J. Ruggie Collective Goods and Future International Collaboration , 1972, American Political Science Review.

[6]  Margaret Sharp,et al.  European Technological Collaboration , 1987 .

[7]  J. E. Mazur,et al.  MAKING UP OUR MINDS , 1987 .

[8]  Kenneth N. Waltz,et al.  Theory of International Politics , 1979 .

[9]  Kenneth A. Oye Cooperation under Anarchy , 1986 .

[10]  K. Hayward International collaboration in civil aerospace , 1986 .

[11]  R. Duane Hall,et al.  The International Joint Venture , 1984 .

[12]  S. Goldenberg Hands Across the Ocean: Managing Joint Ventures With a Spotlight on China and Japan , 1988 .

[13]  Thomas Omestad Selling off America , 1989 .

[14]  Lowell Dittmer The Strategic Triangle: An Elementary Game-Theoretical Analysis , 1981, World Politics.

[15]  Richard J. Samuels,et al.  Defense production and industrial development : the case of Japanese aircraft , 1988 .

[16]  Louis Turner,et al.  Industrial Collaboration With Japan , 1987 .

[17]  Robert O. Keohane,et al.  Power and interdependence , 1977 .

[18]  J. Walmsley Handbook of international joint ventures , 1982 .

[19]  Mark A Lorell,et al.  Multinational development of large aircraft: The European experience , 1980 .

[20]  Robert O. Keohane,et al.  After Hegemony , 2005 .

[21]  H. Raiffa,et al.  GAMES AND DECISIONS; INTRODUCTION AND CRITICAL SURVEY. , 1958 .

[22]  D. Mares Middle Powers under Regional Hegemony: To Challenge or Acquiesce in Hegemonic Enforcement , 1988 .

[23]  C. Bartlett,et al.  Managing across Borders: The Transnational Solution , 1990 .

[24]  Walter Goldstein,et al.  The Multinational Corporation and the Resource Cost of International Technology Transfer by David J. Teece (review) , 1977 .

[25]  Karen J. Hladik International joint ventures: An economic analysis of U.S.-foreign business partnerships , 1985 .

[26]  John W. Clarr Cooperative Strategies in International Business , 1990 .

[27]  David C. Mowery,et al.  Alliance Politics and Economics: Multinational Joint Ventures in Commercial Aircraft , 1987 .

[28]  R. Gilpin War and Change in World Politics: Index , 1981 .

[29]  Harbir Singh Managing for Joint Venture Success , 1986 .

[30]  M. Grieco,et al.  Anarchy and the limits of cooperation: a realist critique of the newest liberal institutionalism , 1988, International Organization.

[31]  D. Mowery International collaborative ventures in U.S. manufacturing , 1988 .

[32]  C. Prestowitz Trading places : how America is surrendering its future to Japan and how to win it back , 1988 .

[33]  H. Nau Collective responses to R&D problems in Western Europe: 1955–1958 and 1968–1973 , 1975, International Organization.

[34]  J. Rosenau Before cooperation: hegemons, regimes, and habit-driven actors in world politics , 1986, International Organization.

[35]  W. Hamilton,et al.  The Evolution of Cooperation , 1984 .

[36]  Michael Taylor,et al.  Anarchy and cooperation , 1976 .

[37]  Joanne Gowa Anarchy, egoism, and third images: The Evolution of Cooperation and international relations , 1986, International Organization.

[38]  K. Hartley NATO Arms Co-Operation: A Study in Economics and Politics , 1983 .

[39]  E. Lovell,et al.  Joint ventures with foreign partners , 1967 .

[40]  Sidney C. Sufrin,et al.  The Logic of Collective Action: Public Goods and the Theory of Groups. , 1966 .

[41]  R. Gilpin,et al.  France in the Age of the Scientific State , 1968 .