Rapidly acquired shape and face aftereffects are retinotopic and local in origin

Visual adaptation results in aftereffects that exaggerate the difference between successively experienced stimuli. In the tilt aftereffect (TAE), for example, the perceived orientation of a test line is repelled from the orientation of an adapting line. This principle also applies to more complex stimuli. Adaptation to faces can displace the next face viewed along axes such as identity, gender, ethnicity and specific emotions (Webster et al., 2004). The TAE field has been proposed as a general mechanism by which perceptual differences between shapes, including faces, could be enhanced through the systematic application of local TAEs (Dickinson, Almeida, et al., 2010). In this way perception of faces could be systematically modified along any dimension of interest defined by face morphology. Because the time course of adaptation for the TAE is rapid (Sekuler & Littlejohn, 1974) the same needs to be true for shapes and faces and Experiment 1 of this study shows that it is. Moreover, the orientation selective cells in early visual cortex are retinotopically arranged with limited receptive field sizes and so are sensitive to stimuli in particular regions of the visual field. A TAE field explanation for shape and face adaptation requires, therefore, that the shape and face aftereffects are retinotopic and Experiment 2 obtains this result. Experiment 3 exploits the folded face illusion to demonstrate that adaptation to a simple orientation field can also result in a shift in the perceived emotion in a face.

[1]  G. Westheimer,et al.  Spatial location and hyperacuity: The centre/surround localization contribution function has two substrates , 1985, Vision Research.

[2]  G. Kovács,et al.  Adaptation duration affects the spatial selectivity of facial aftereffects , 2007, Vision Research.

[3]  Rachel A Robbins,et al.  Aftereffects for face attributes with different natural variability: adapter position effects and neural models. , 2007, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[4]  Richard M. Lipkin,et al.  Adaptation across the Cortical Hierarchy: Low-Level Curve Adaptation Affects High-Level Facial-Expression Judgments , 2008, The Journal of Neuroscience.

[5]  G. Rhodes,et al.  The dynamics of visual adaptation to faces , 2005, Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences.

[6]  J. B. Levitt,et al.  Receptive fields and functional architecture of macaque V2. , 1994, Journal of neurophysiology.

[7]  G. Rhodes,et al.  The dynamics of visual adaptation to faces. , 2005, Proceedings. Biological sciences.

[8]  Jason Bell,et al.  Local motion effects on form in radial frequency patterns. , 2010, Journal of vision.

[9]  Gunter Loffler,et al.  Perception of contours and shapes: Low and intermediate stage mechanisms , 2008, Vision Research.

[10]  Mark W. Greenlee,et al.  Position-specific and position-invariant face aftereffects reflect the adaptation of different cortical areas , 2008, NeuroImage.

[11]  J M Findlay,et al.  Eye Movement Strategies Involved in Face Perception , 2013, Perception.

[12]  D. Melcher Predictive remapping of visual features precedes saccadic eye movements , 2007, Nature Neuroscience.

[13]  J. Gibson Adaptation, after-effect, and contrast in the perception of tilted lines. II. Simultaneous contrast and the areal restriction of the after-effect. , 1937 .

[14]  David R. Badcock,et al.  Narrow-band radial frequency shape channels revealed by sub-threshold summation , 2009, Vision Research.

[15]  D. Regan,et al.  Shape discrimination and the judgement of perfect symmetry: Dissociation of shape from size , 1992, Vision Research.

[16]  M. Webster,et al.  Adaptation to natural facial categories , 2002, Nature.

[17]  Jason Bell,et al.  Global shape aftereffects have a local substrate: A tilt aftereffect field. , 2010, Journal of vision.

[18]  Michael L. Mack,et al.  Holistic processing of faces happens at a glance , 2009, Vision Research.

[19]  Gerald Westheimer,et al.  Illusions in the spatial sense of the eye: Geometrical–optical illusions and the neural representation of space , 2008, Vision Research.

[20]  Gunter Loffler,et al.  Local and global contributions to shape discrimination , 2003, Vision Research.

[21]  B. Murphy,et al.  Adaptation to natural facial categories , 2022 .

[22]  P. Cavanagh,et al.  Retinotopy of the face aftereffect , 2008, Vision Research.

[23]  Jonathan R. McDaniel,et al.  Face Adaptation without a Face , 2010, Current Biology.

[24]  A. O'Toole,et al.  Prototype-referenced shape encoding revealed by high-level aftereffects , 2001, Nature Neuroscience.

[25]  J. Gibson,et al.  ADAPTATION , AFTEREFFECT AND CONTRAST IN THE PERCEPTION OF TILTED LINES , 2004 .

[26]  Bernhard Schölkopf,et al.  Center-surround patterns emerge as optimal predictors for human saccade targets. , 2009, Journal of vision.

[27]  D. Hubel,et al.  Receptive fields and functional architecture of monkey striate cortex , 1968, The Journal of physiology.

[28]  Patrick Cavanagh,et al.  The reference frame of the tilt aftereffect. , 2011, Journal of vision.

[29]  G. Rhodes,et al.  Orientation-Contingent Face Aftereffects and Implications for Face-Coding Mechanisms , 2004, Current Biology.

[30]  T. Salthouse,et al.  Determinants of eye-fixation duration. , 1980, The American journal of psychology.

[31]  G. Westheimer,et al.  Spatial location and hyperacuity: flank position within the centre and surround zones. , 1985, Spatial vision.

[32]  T. Valentine The Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology Section A: Human Experimental Psychology a Unified Account of the Effects of Distinctiveness, Inversion, and Race in Face Recognition , 2022 .

[33]  C. Blakemore,et al.  Curvature Detectors in Human Vision? , 1974, Perception.

[34]  D. Mitchell,et al.  Does the tilt after-effect occur in the oblique meridian? , 1976, Vision Research.

[35]  D. Ferster,et al.  Neural mechanisms of orientation selectivity in the visual cortex. , 2000, Annual review of neuroscience.

[36]  P. Dayan,et al.  Space and time in visual context , 2007, Nature Reviews Neuroscience.

[37]  Mark W. Greenlee,et al.  Saturation of the tilt aftereffect , 1987, Vision Research.

[38]  P. Cavanagh,et al.  The gender-specific face aftereffect is based in retinotopic not spatiotopic coordinates across several natural image transformations. , 2009, Journal of vision.

[39]  E. McKone,et al.  Solving the upside-down puzzle: Why do upright and inverted face aftereffects look alike? , 2010, Journal of vision.

[40]  R Sekuler,et al.  Letter: Tilt aftereffect following very brief exposures. , 1974, Vision research.

[41]  Jeremy M. Wolfe,et al.  Short test flashes produce large tilt aftereffects , 1984, Vision Research.

[42]  David R. Badcock,et al.  Detection of shape in radial frequency contours: Independence of local and global form information , 2007, Vision Research.

[43]  P. Cavanagh,et al.  A shape-contrast effect for briefly presented stimuli. , 1998, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[44]  D. Melcher Spatiotopic Transfer of Visual-Form Adaptation across Saccadic Eye Movements , 2005, Current Biology.

[45]  G. Rhodes,et al.  The timecourse of higher-level face aftereffects , 2007, Vision Research.

[46]  Christopher P Benton,et al.  Effect of Photographic Negation on Face Expression Aftereffects , 2009, Perception.