Conditional Entropy and Location Error in Indoor Localization Using Probabilistic Wi-Fi Fingerprinting

Localization systems are increasingly valuable, but their location estimates are only useful when the uncertainty of the estimate is known. This uncertainty is currently calculated as the location error given a ground truth, which is then used as a static measure in sometimes very different environments. In contrast, we propose the use of the conditional entropy of a posterior probability distribution as a complementary measure of uncertainty. This measure has the advantage of being dynamic, i.e., it can be calculated during localization based on individual sensor measurements, does not require a ground truth, and can be applied to discrete localization algorithms. Furthermore, for every consistent location estimation algorithm, both the location error and the conditional entropy measures must be related, i.e., a low entropy should always correspond with a small location error, while a high entropy can correspond with either a small or large location error. We validate this relationship experimentally by calculating both measures of uncertainty in three publicly available datasets using probabilistic Wi-Fi fingerprinting with eight different implementations of the sensor model. We show that the discrepancy between these measures, i.e., many location estimates having a high location error while simultaneously having a low conditional entropy, is largest for the least realistic implementations of the probabilistic sensor model. Based on the results presented in this paper, we conclude that conditional entropy, being dynamic, complementary to location error, and applicable to both continuous and discrete localization, provides an important extra means of characterizing a localization method.

[1]  Jian Lv,et al.  Infrastructure-Free Floor Localization Through Crowdsourcing , 2015, Journal of Computer Science and Technology.

[2]  Gordon Wyeth,et al.  RatSLAM: Using Models of Rodent Hippocampus for Robot Navigation and Beyond , 2013, ISRR.

[3]  Dirk Grunwald,et al.  A Survey of Wireless Path Loss Prediction and Coverage Mapping Methods , 2013, IEEE Communications Surveys & Tutorials.

[4]  David J. C. MacKay,et al.  Information Theory, Inference, and Learning Algorithms , 2004, IEEE Transactions on Information Theory.

[5]  I. Miller Probability, Random Variables, and Stochastic Processes , 1966 .

[6]  John G. Proakis,et al.  Probability, random variables and stochastic processes , 1985, IEEE Trans. Acoust. Speech Signal Process..

[7]  Maria João Nicolau,et al.  Wi-Fi fingerprinting in the real world - RTLS@UM at the EvAAL competition , 2015, 2015 International Conference on Indoor Positioning and Indoor Navigation (IPIN).

[8]  Thomas M. Cover,et al.  Elements of Information Theory , 2005 .

[9]  Paolo Barsocchi,et al.  Evaluating indoor localization solutions in large environments through competitive benchmarking: The EvAAL-ETRI competition , 2015, 2015 International Conference on Indoor Positioning and Indoor Navigation (IPIN).

[10]  S. Kay Fundamentals of statistical signal processing: estimation theory , 1993 .

[11]  Herbert Peremans,et al.  Asynchronous, electromagnetic sensor fusion in RatSLAM , 2015, 2015 IEEE SENSORS.

[12]  Adolfo Martínez Usó,et al.  UJIIndoorLoc: A new multi-building and multi-floor database for WLAN fingerprint-based indoor localization problems , 2014, 2014 International Conference on Indoor Positioning and Indoor Navigation (IPIN).

[13]  Andreas Terzis,et al.  Surviving wi-fi interference in low power ZigBee networks , 2010, SenSys '10.

[14]  Azzedine Boukerche,et al.  Location error estimation in wireless ad hoc networks , 2014, Ad Hoc Networks.

[15]  Vladimir Vujovic,et al.  Raspberry Pi as a Sensor Web node for home automation , 2015, Comput. Electr. Eng..

[16]  Shih-Hau Fang,et al.  A Novel Fused Positioning Feature for Handling Heterogeneous Hardware Problem , 2015, IEEE Transactions on Communications.

[17]  James Pinchin,et al.  Wi-Fi fingerprinting based on collaborative confidence level training , 2016, Pervasive Mob. Comput..

[18]  Maarten Weyn Opportunistic seamless localization , 2011 .

[19]  Vlado Handziski,et al.  Experimental decomposition of the performance of fingerprinting-based localization algorithms , 2014, 2014 International Conference on Indoor Positioning and Indoor Navigation (IPIN).

[20]  Raúl Montoliu,et al.  Comprehensive analysis of distance and similarity measures for Wi-Fi fingerprinting indoor positioning systems , 2015, Expert Syst. Appl..

[21]  Sukhan Lee,et al.  High Performance Indoor Location Wi-Fi Fingerprinting using Invariant Received Signal Strength , 2016, IMCOM.

[22]  Myungchul Kim,et al.  Interference-aware self-optimizing Wi-Fi for high efficiency internet of things in dense networks , 2016, Comput. Commun..

[23]  Shueng-Han Gary Chan,et al.  Wi-Fi Fingerprint-Based Indoor Positioning: Recent Advances and Comparisons , 2016, IEEE Communications Surveys & Tutorials.

[24]  Maria Papadopouli,et al.  Low-dimensional signal-strength fingerprint-based positioning in wireless LANs , 2014, Ad Hoc Networks.

[25]  Ingrid Moerman,et al.  Platform for benchmarking of RF-based indoor localization solutions , 2015, IEEE Communications Magazine.

[26]  Herbert Peremans,et al.  Localization performance quantification by conditional entropy , 2015, 2015 International Conference on Indoor Positioning and Indoor Navigation (IPIN).

[27]  Kaveh Pahlavan,et al.  Localization Challenges for the Emergence of the Smart World , 2015, IEEE Access.

[28]  Jan Steckel,et al.  BatSLAM: Simultaneous Localization and Mapping Using Biomimetic Sonar , 2013, PloS one.

[29]  R. Yarlagadda,et al.  GPS GDOP metric , 2000 .