Understanding the challenges of protein flexibility in drug design

Introduction: Protein–ligand interactions play key roles in various metabolic pathways, and the proteins involved in these interactions represent major targets for drug discovery. Molecular docking is widely used to predict the structure of protein–ligand complexes, and protein flexibility stands out as one of the most important and challenging issues for binding mode prediction. Various docking methods accounting for protein flexibility have been proposed, tackling problems of ever-increasing dimensionality. Areas covered: This paper presents an overview of conformational sampling methods treating target flexibility during molecular docking. Special attention is given to approaches considering full protein flexibility. Contrary to what is frequently done, this review does not rely on classical biomolecular recognition models to classify existing docking methods. Instead, it applies algorithmic considerations, focusing on the level of flexibility accounted for. This review also discusses the diversity of docking applications, from virtual screening (VS) of small drug-like compounds to geometry prediction (GP) of protein–peptide complexes. Expert opinion: Considering the diversity of docking methods presented here, deciding which one is the best at treating protein flexibility depends on the system under study and the research application. In VS experiments, ensemble docking can be used to implicitly account for large-scale conformational changes, and selective docking can additionally consider local binding-site rearrangements. In other cases, on-the-fly exploration of the whole protein–ligand complex might be needed for accurate GP of the binding mode. Among other things, future methods are expected to provide alternative binding modes, which will better reflect the dynamic nature of protein–ligand interactions.

[1]  D. Koshland Application of a Theory of Enzyme Specificity to Protein Synthesis. , 1958, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[2]  S. Kim,et al.  "Soft docking": matching of molecular surface cubes. , 1991, Journal of molecular biology.

[3]  Ruben Abagyan,et al.  ICM—A new method for protein modeling and design: Applications to docking and structure prediction from the distorted native conformation , 1994, J. Comput. Chem..

[4]  H J Berendsen,et al.  Molecular dynamics simulation of the docking of substrates to proteins , 1994, Proteins.

[5]  Yuan-Ping Pang,et al.  Prediction of the binding site of 1-benzyl-4-[(5,6-dimethoxy-1-indanon-2-yl)methyl]piperidine in acetylcholinesterase by docking studies with the SYSDOC program , 1994, J. Comput. Aided Mol. Des..

[6]  A. Leach,et al.  Ligand docking to proteins with discrete side-chain flexibility. , 1994, Journal of molecular biology.

[7]  R. Glen,et al.  Molecular recognition of receptor sites using a genetic algorithm with a description of desolvation. , 1995, Journal of molecular biology.

[8]  Pieter F. W. Stouten,et al.  A molecular mechanics/grid method for evaluation of ligand–receptor interactions , 1995, J. Comput. Chem..

[9]  I Lasters,et al.  Computation of the binding of fully flexible peptides to proteins with flexible side chains , 1997, FASEB journal : official publication of the Federation of American Societies for Experimental Biology.

[10]  I. Kuntz,et al.  Molecular docking to ensembles of protein structures. , 1997, Journal of molecular biology.

[11]  Gennady M Verkhivker,et al.  Predicting structural effects in HIV‐1 protease mutant complexes with flexible ligand docking and protein side‐chain optimization , 1998, Proteins.

[12]  J. Tainer,et al.  Screening a peptidyl database for potential ligands to proteins with side‐chain flexibility , 1998, Proteins.

[13]  Amedeo Caflisch,et al.  Docking small ligands in flexible binding sites , 1998, J. Comput. Chem..

[14]  R Nussinov,et al.  Flexible docking allowing induced fit in proteins: Insights from an open to closed conformational isomers , 1998, Proteins.

[15]  A. di Nola,et al.  Docking of flexible ligands to flexible receptors in solution by molecular dynamics simulation , 1999, Proteins.

[16]  Heinz Sklenar,et al.  Harmonic modes as variables to approximately account for receptor flexibility in ligand-receptor docking simulations: Application to DNA minor groove ligand complex , 1999, J. Comput. Chem..

[17]  István Kolossváry,et al.  Low-mode conformational search elucidated: Application to C39H80 and flexible docking of 9-deazaguanine inhibitors into PNP , 1999, J. Comput. Chem..

[18]  L. Kuhn,et al.  Virtual screening with solvation and ligand-induced complementarity , 2000 .

[19]  Rafael Najmanovich,et al.  Side‐chain flexibility in proteins upon ligand binding , 2000, Proteins.

[20]  HIV-1 Protease , 2000 .

[21]  F. Bushman,et al.  Developing a dynamic pharmacophore model for HIV-1 integrase. , 2000, Journal of medicinal chemistry.

[22]  B. X. Carlson,et al.  A single glycine residue at the entrance to the first membrane-spanning domain of the gamma-aminobutyric acid type A receptor beta(2) subunit affects allosteric sensitivity to GABA and anesthetics. , 2000, Molecular pharmacology.

[23]  J A McCammon,et al.  Accommodating protein flexibility in computational drug design. , 2000, Molecular pharmacology.

[24]  R. Nussinov,et al.  Protein Folding: Binding of Conformationally Fluctuating Building Blocks Via Population Selection , 2001, Critical reviews in biochemistry and molecular biology.

[25]  Thomas Lengauer,et al.  FlexE: efficient molecular docking considering protein structure variations. , 2001, Journal of molecular biology.

[26]  H. Bosshard,et al.  Molecular recognition by induced fit: how fit is the concept? , 2001, News in physiological sciences : an international journal of physiology produced jointly by the International Union of Physiological Sciences and the American Physiological Society.

[27]  I Kolossváry,et al.  Fully flexible low-mode docking: application to induced fit in HIV integrase. , 2001, Journal of the American Chemical Society.

[28]  D. Goodsell,et al.  Automated docking to multiple target structures: Incorporation of protein mobility and structural water heterogeneity in AutoDock , 2002, Proteins.

[29]  J. Mccammon,et al.  Computational drug design accommodating receptor flexibility: the relaxed complex scheme. , 2002, Journal of the American Chemical Society.

[30]  M L Teodoro,et al.  Conformational flexibility models for the receptor in structure based drug design. , 2003, Current pharmaceutical design.

[31]  Lydia E. Kavraki,et al.  Understanding Protein Flexibility through Dimensionality Reduction , 2003, J. Comput. Biol..

[32]  Diane Joseph-McCarthy,et al.  Pharmacophore‐based molecular docking to account for ligand flexibility , 2003, Proteins.

[33]  B. Shoichet,et al.  Soft docking and multiple receptor conformations in virtual screening. , 2004, Journal of medicinal chemistry.

[34]  Brian K Shoichet,et al.  Testing a flexible-receptor docking algorithm in a model binding site. , 2004, Journal of molecular biology.

[35]  Claudio N. Cavasotto,et al.  Protein flexibility in ligand docking and virtual screening to protein kinases. , 2004, Journal of molecular biology.

[36]  William J. Welsh,et al.  Identification of a Minimal Subset of Receptor Conformations for Improved Multiple Conformation Docking and Two-Step Scoring , 2004, J. Chem. Inf. Model..

[37]  Martin Zacharias,et al.  Rapid protein–ligand docking using soft modes from molecular dynamics simulations to account for protein deformability: Binding of FK506 to FKBP , 2004, Proteins.

[38]  Conrad C. Huang,et al.  UCSF Chimera—A visualization system for exploratory research and analysis , 2004, J. Comput. Chem..

[39]  M. Nilges,et al.  Complementarity of structure ensembles in protein-protein binding. , 2004, Structure.

[40]  Claudio N. Cavasotto,et al.  Representing receptor flexibility in ligand docking through relevant normal modes. , 2005, Journal of the American Chemical Society.

[41]  Claudio N. Cavasotto,et al.  Conformational Sampling of Protein Flexibility in Generalized Coordinates: Application to Ligand Docking , 2005 .

[42]  X. Barril,et al.  Unveiling the full potential of flexible receptor docking using multiple crystallographic structures. , 2005, Journal of medicinal chemistry.

[43]  Akiko Itai,et al.  Effective handling of induced‐fit motion in flexible docking , 2006, Proteins.

[44]  Jens Meiler,et al.  ROSETTALIGAND: Protein–small molecule docking with full side‐chain flexibility , 2006, Proteins.

[45]  X. Barril,et al.  Incorporating protein flexibility into docking and structure-based drug design , 2006, Expert opinion on drug discovery.

[46]  R. Friesner,et al.  Novel procedure for modeling ligand/receptor induced fit effects. , 2006, Journal of medicinal chemistry.

[47]  J. G. Park,et al.  FlexE ensemble docking approach to virtual screening for CDK2 inhibitors , 2007 .

[48]  Jonathan Kadmon,et al.  Molecular dynamics simulations of palmitate entry into the hydrophobic pocket of the fatty acid binding protein , 2007, FEBS letters.

[49]  Heather A Carlson,et al.  Exploring experimental sources of multiple protein conformations in structure-based drug design. , 2007, Journal of the American Chemical Society.

[50]  X. Zou,et al.  Ensemble docking of multiple protein structures: Considering protein structural variations in molecular docking , 2006, Proteins.

[51]  Markus Wagener,et al.  A flexible approach to induced fit docking. , 2007, Journal of medicinal chemistry.

[52]  Xiaoqin Zou,et al.  Efficient molecular docking of NMR structures: Application to HIV‐1 protease , 2006, Protein science : a publication of the Protein Society.

[53]  Christopher R. Corbeil,et al.  Docking Ligands into Flexible and Solvated Macromolecules, 1. Development and Validation of FITTED 1.0 , 2007, J. Chem. Inf. Model..

[54]  Rommie E. Amaro,et al.  An improved relaxed complex scheme for receptor flexibility in computer-aided drug design , 2008, J. Comput. Aided Mol. Des..

[55]  Christopher R. Corbeil,et al.  Docking Ligands into Flexible and Solvated Macromolecules. 2. Development and Application of Fitted 1.5 to the Virtual Screening of Potential HCV Polymerase Inhibitors , 2008, J. Chem. Inf. Model..

[56]  Chung F Wong,et al.  Flexible protein–flexible ligand docking with disrupted velocity simulated annealing , 2008, Proteins.

[57]  David Baker,et al.  Macromolecular modeling with rosetta. , 2008, Annual review of biochemistry.

[58]  M. Zacharias,et al.  Protein-ligand docking accounting for receptor side chain and global flexibility in normal modes: evaluation on kinase inhibitor cross docking. , 2008, Journal of medicinal chemistry.

[59]  Nurit Haspel,et al.  Electrostatic contributions drive the interaction between Staphylococcus aureus protein Efb‐C and its complement target C3d , 2008, Protein science : a publication of the Protein Society.

[60]  L. Kavraki,et al.  Multiscale characterization of protein conformational ensembles , 2009, Proteins.

[61]  Christopher R. Corbeil,et al.  Docking Ligands into Flexible and Solvated Macromolecules. 3. Impact of Input Ligand Conformation, Protein Flexibility, and Water Molecules on the Accuracy of Docking Programs , 2009, J. Chem. Inf. Model..

[62]  Ruben Abagyan,et al.  Consistent Improvement of Cross-Docking Results Using Binding Site Ensembles Generated with Elastic Network Normal Modes , 2009, J. Chem. Inf. Model..

[63]  B. Zagrovic,et al.  Conformational selection and induced fit mechanism underlie specificity in noncovalent interactions with ubiquitin , 2009, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[64]  Roger S Armen,et al.  An Evaluation of Explicit Receptor Flexibility in Molecular Docking Using Molecular Dynamics and Torsion Angle Molecular Dynamics. , 2009, Journal of chemical theory and computation.

[65]  Ruben Abagyan,et al.  Four-dimensional docking: a fast and accurate account of discrete receptor flexibility in ligand docking. , 2009, Journal of medicinal chemistry.

[66]  Erin S. Bolstad,et al.  In pursuit of virtual lead optimization: Pruning ensembles of receptor structures for increased efficiency and accuracy during docking , 2009, Proteins.

[67]  Ian W. Davis,et al.  RosettaLigand docking with full ligand and receptor flexibility. , 2009, Journal of molecular biology.

[68]  David S. Goodsell,et al.  AutoDock4 and AutoDockTools4: Automated docking with selective receptor flexibility , 2009, J. Comput. Chem..

[69]  Somesh D. Sharma,et al.  Managing protein flexibility in docking and its applications. , 2009, Drug discovery today.

[70]  Christopher R. Corbeil,et al.  Modeling Reality for Optimal Docking of Small Molecules to Biological Targets , 2009 .

[71]  Xavier Barril,et al.  Ensemble Docking from Homology Models. , 2010, Journal of chemical theory and computation.

[72]  Ana T. Winck,et al.  Mining flexible-receptor docking experiments to select promising protein receptor snapshots , 2010, BMC Genomics.

[73]  Y. Li,et al.  Studies of benzothiadiazine derivatives as hepatitis C virus NS5B polymerase inhibitors using 3D-QSAR, molecular docking and molecular dynamics. , 2010, Current medicinal chemistry.

[74]  Feng Ding,et al.  Rapid Flexible Docking Using a Stochastic Rotamer Library of Ligands , 2010, J. Chem. Inf. Model..

[75]  Olivier Sperandio,et al.  How to choose relevant multiple receptor conformations for virtual screening: a test case of Cdk2 and normal mode analysis , 2010, European Biophysics Journal.

[76]  Huan‐Xiang Zhou From induced fit to conformational selection: a continuum of binding mechanism controlled by the timescale of conformational transitions. , 2010, Biophysical journal.

[77]  Jonathan W. Essex,et al.  Ensemble Docking into Multiple Crystallographically Derived Protein Structures: An Evaluation Based on the Statistical Analysis of Enrichments , 2010, J. Chem. Inf. Model..

[78]  Iris Antes,et al.  DynaDock: A new molecular dynamics‐based algorithm for protein–peptide docking including receptor flexibility , 2010, Proteins: Structure, Function, and Bioinformatics.

[79]  Victor Guallar,et al.  Exploring hierarchical refinement techniques for induced fit docking with protein and ligand flexibility , 2009, J. Comput. Chem..

[80]  Thierry Siméon,et al.  Simulating ligand-induced conformational changes in proteins using a mechanical disassembly method. , 2010, Physical chemistry chemical physics : PCCP.

[81]  R. Nussinov,et al.  Induced Fit, Conformational Selection and Independent Dynamic Segments: an Extended View of Binding Events Opinion , 2022 .

[82]  R. Nussinov,et al.  Allostery and population shift in drug discovery. , 2010, Current opinion in pharmacology.

[83]  Bert L. de Groot,et al.  Conformational Transitions upon Ligand Binding: Holo-Structure Prediction from Apo Conformations , 2010, PLoS Comput. Biol..

[84]  L. Kavraki,et al.  Multi‐scale characterization of the energy landscape of proteins with application to the C3D/Efb‐C complex , 2010, Proteins.

[85]  J. D. Figueroa-Villar,et al.  Design, docking studies and molecular dynamics of new potential selective inhibitors of Plasmodium falciparum serine hydroxymethyltransferase , 2010 .

[86]  Ian T. Crosby,et al.  Homology Modeling and Docking Evaluation of Aminergic G Protein-Coupled Receptors , 2010, J. Chem. Inf. Model..

[87]  Zhiwei Yang,et al.  Synergistic effects in the designs of neuraminidase ligands: analysis from docking and molecular dynamics studies. , 2010, Journal of theoretical biology.

[88]  Ruben Abagyan,et al.  Recipes for the Selection of Experimental Protein Conformations for Virtual Screening , 2010, J. Chem. Inf. Model..

[89]  Martin Zacharias,et al.  Tackling the challenges posed by target flexibility in drug design , 2010, Expert opinion on drug discovery.

[90]  Ruben Abagyan,et al.  Improved docking, screening and selectivity prediction for small molecule nuclear receptor modulators using conformational ensembles , 2010, J. Comput. Aided Mol. Des..

[91]  Arthur J. Olson,et al.  AutoDock Vina: Improving the speed and accuracy of docking with a new scoring function, efficient optimization, and multithreading , 2009, J. Comput. Chem..

[92]  Christine Humblet,et al.  Chemical space sampling by different scoring functions and crystal structures , 2010, J. Comput. Aided Mol. Des..

[93]  Mengang Xu,et al.  Significant Enhancement of Docking Sensitivity Using Implicit Ligand Sampling , 2011, J. Chem. Inf. Model..

[94]  R. Abagyan,et al.  Systematic Exploitation of Multiple Receptor Conformations for Virtual Ligand Screening , 2011, PloS one.

[95]  Masahiko Ito,et al.  A new method for induced fit docking (GENIUS) and its application to virtual screening of novel HCV NS3-4A protease inhibitors. , 2011, Bioorganic & Medicinal Chemistry.

[96]  K. Whalen,et al.  Hybrid Steered Molecular Dynamics‐Docking: An Efficient Solution to the Problem of Ranking Inhibitor Affinities Against a Flexible Drug Target. , 2011, Molecular informatics.

[97]  Nir London,et al.  Rosetta FlexPepDock ab-initio: Simultaneous Folding, Docking and Refinement of Peptides onto Their Receptors , 2011, PloS one.

[98]  Harrison J. Hocker,et al.  Novel Allosteric Sites on Ras for Lead Generation , 2011, PloS one.

[99]  Wolfgang Wenzel,et al.  Receptor flexibility in small‐molecule docking calculations , 2011 .

[100]  P. Sokkar,et al.  Computational modeling on the recognition of the HRE motif by HIF-1: molecular docking and molecular dynamics studies , 2012, Journal of Molecular Modeling.

[101]  J. Changeux,et al.  Conformational selection or induced fit? 50 years of debate resolved , 2011, F1000 biology reports.

[102]  Martin Zacharias,et al.  Efficient inclusion of receptor flexibility in grid‐based protein–ligand docking* , 2011, J. Comput. Chem..

[103]  Claudio N. Cavasotto,et al.  Docking-based virtual screening for ligands of G protein-coupled receptors: not only crystal structures but also in silico models. , 2011, Journal of molecular graphics & modelling.

[104]  Yan Li,et al.  Discovery of Novel Checkpoint Kinase 1 Inhibitors by Virtual Screening Based on Multiple Crystal Structures , 2011, J. Chem. Inf. Model..

[105]  Patrick McCabe,et al.  The Ensemble Performance Index: An Improved Measure for Assessing Ensemble Pose Prediction Performance , 2011, J. Chem. Inf. Model..

[106]  James Andrew McCammon,et al.  Predictive Power of Molecular Dynamics Receptor Structures in Virtual Screening , 2011, J. Chem. Inf. Model..

[107]  M. Lill Efficient incorporation of protein flexibility and dynamics into molecular docking simulations. , 2011, Biochemistry.

[108]  Riccardo Baron,et al.  Computational Drug Discovery and Design , 2012, Methods in Molecular Biology.

[109]  Joseph Audie,et al.  Recent work in the development and application of protein-peptide docking. , 2012, Future medicinal chemistry.

[110]  Isabel C F R Ferreira,et al.  Selective Flexibility of Side‐Chain Residues Improves VEGFR‐2 Docking Score using AutoDock Vina , 2012, Chemical biology & drug design.

[111]  Xavier Barril,et al.  Physico-Chemical and Computational Approaches to Drug Discovery , 2012 .

[112]  Matteo Masetti,et al.  Chapter 11:Enhanced Sampling Methods in Drug Design , 2012 .

[113]  Wolfgang Wenzel,et al.  Modeling loop backbone flexibility in receptor‐ligand docking simulations , 2012, J. Comput. Chem..

[114]  Ruben Abagyan,et al.  ALiBERO: Evolving a Team of Complementary Pocket Conformations Rather than a Single Leader , 2012, J. Chem. Inf. Model..

[115]  Lydia E Kavraki,et al.  Computational models of protein kinematics and dynamics: beyond simulation. , 2012, Annual review of analytical chemistry.

[116]  Lydia E. Kavraki,et al.  Modeling Structures and Motions of Loops in Protein Molecules , 2012, Entropy.

[117]  Thomas Lengauer,et al.  On the Applicability of Elastic Network Normal Modes in Small-Molecule Docking , 2012, J. Chem. Inf. Model..

[118]  Modesto Orozco,et al.  Application of Drug-Perturbed Essential Dynamics/Molecular Dynamics (ED/MD) to Virtual Screening and Rational Drug Design. , 2012, Journal of chemical theory and computation.

[119]  Jens Meiler,et al.  Rosetta Ligand docking with flexible XML protocols. , 2012, Methods in molecular biology.

[120]  G. Bowman,et al.  Equilibrium fluctuations of a single folded protein reveal a multitude of potential cryptic allosteric sites , 2012, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[121]  Lydia E. Kavraki,et al.  Protein–Ligand Interactions: Computational Docking , 2012 .

[122]  Vishwesh Venkatraman,et al.  Flexible protein docking refinement using pose‐dependent normal mode analysis , 2012, Proteins.

[123]  Chaok Seok,et al.  GalaxyDock: Protein-Ligand Docking with Flexible Protein Side-chains , 2012, J. Chem. Inf. Model..

[124]  Katrina W Lexa,et al.  Protein flexibility in docking and surface mapping , 2012, Quarterly Reviews of Biophysics.

[125]  M. Rosales-Hernández,et al.  Docking and DFT Studies to explore the Topoisomerase II ATP Pocket employing 3-Substituted 2,6-Piperazindiones for drug design , 2012 .

[126]  Mengang Xu,et al.  Utilizing Experimental Data for Reducing Ensemble Size in Flexible-Protein Docking , 2012, J. Chem. Inf. Model..

[127]  R. Nussinov,et al.  Expanding the conformational selection paradigm in protein-ligand docking. , 2012, Methods in molecular biology.

[128]  Oliver Korb,et al.  Potential and Limitations of Ensemble Docking , 2012, J. Chem. Inf. Model..

[129]  António J. M. Ribeiro,et al.  Protein-ligand docking in the new millennium--a retrospective of 10 years in the field. , 2013, Current medicinal chemistry.

[130]  L. Kavraki,et al.  DINC: A new AutoDock-based protocol for docking large ligands , 2013, BMC Structural Biology.

[131]  Marcel Schumann,et al.  Systematic and efficient side chain optimization for molecular docking using a cheapest‐path procedure , 2013, J. Comput. Chem..

[132]  Olivier Sperandio,et al.  One hundred thousand mouse clicks down the road: selected online resources supporting drug discovery collected over a decade. , 2013, Drug discovery today.

[133]  J. Correa-Basurto,et al.  Automated docking for novel drug discovery , 2013, Expert opinion on drug discovery.

[134]  L. Kavraki,et al.  SIMS: A Hybrid Method for Rapid Conformational Analysis , 2013, PloS one.

[135]  Marcin Hoffmann,et al.  The MM2QM tool for combining docking, molecular dynamics, molecular mechanics, and quantum mechanics † , 2013, J. Comput. Chem..

[136]  J. Mccammon,et al.  Accounting for Receptor Flexibility and Enhanced Sampling Methods in Computer‐Aided Drug Design , 2013, Chemical biology & drug design.

[137]  Elizabeth Yuriev,et al.  Latest developments in molecular docking: 2010–2011 in review , 2013, Journal of molecular recognition : JMR.

[138]  Arthur J. Olson,et al.  Automated Docking with Protein Flexibility in the Design of Femtomolar "Click Chemistry" Inhibitors of Acetylcholinesterase , 2013, J. Chem. Inf. Model..

[139]  L. Dardenne,et al.  Receptor–ligand molecular docking , 2013, Biophysical Reviews.

[140]  Andrzej Kolinski,et al.  CABS-fold: server for the de novo and consensus-based prediction of protein structure , 2013, Nucleic Acids Res..

[141]  Martin Smiesko DOLINA - Docking Based on a Local Induced-Fit Algorithm: Application toward Small-Molecule Binding to Nuclear Receptors , 2013, J. Chem. Inf. Model..

[142]  M. Rosales-Hernández,et al.  o-Alkylselenenylated benzoic acid accesses several sites in serum albumin according to fluorescence studies, Raman spectroscopy and theoretical simulations. , 2013, Protein and peptide letters.

[143]  Valérie Campagna-Slater,et al.  Methods for docking small molecules to macromolecules: a user's perspective. 2. Applications. , 2014, Current pharmaceutical design.

[144]  J. Mccammon,et al.  Exploring the role of receptor flexibility in structure-based drug discovery. , 2014, Biophysical chemistry.

[145]  Haiou Li,et al.  PaFlexPepDock: Parallel Ab-Initio Docking of Peptides onto Their Receptors with Full Flexibility Based on Rosetta , 2014, PloS one.

[146]  Xiaoqin Zou,et al.  Challenges, Applications, and Recent Advances of Protein-Ligand Docking in Structure-Based Drug Design , 2014, Molecules.

[147]  Matthias Rarey,et al.  Benchmark Data Sets for Structure-Based Computational Target Prediction , 2014, J. Chem. Inf. Model..

[148]  Vincent Zoete,et al.  Toward On-The-Fly Quantum Mechanical/Molecular Mechanical (QM/MM) Docking: Development and Benchmark of a Scoring Function , 2014, J. Chem. Inf. Model..

[149]  Valérie Campagna-Slater,et al.  Methods for docking small molecules to macromolecules: a user's perspective. 1. The theory. , 2014, Current pharmaceutical design.

[150]  Hasup Lee,et al.  GalaxyPepDock: a protein–peptide docking tool based on interaction similarity and energy optimization , 2015, Nucleic Acids Res..

[151]  Jessica Holien,et al.  Improvements, trends, and new ideas in molecular docking: 2012–2013 in review , 2015, Journal of molecular recognition : JMR.

[152]  Mateusz Kurcinski,et al.  Coarse-Grained Modeling of Peptide Docking Associated with Large Conformation Transitions of the Binding Protein: Troponin I Fragment–Troponin C System , 2015, Molecules.

[153]  Bernhard Y. Renard,et al.  Docking small peptides remains a great challenge: an assessment using AutoDock Vina , 2015, Briefings Bioinform..

[154]  Matteo Masetti,et al.  Protein Flexibility in Drug Discovery: From Theory to Computation , 2015, ChemMedChem.