Size-disparity correlation in stereopsis at contrast threshold.

Contrast thresholds for 75% correct depth identification in narrow-band filtered random dot stereograms were determined for different center spatial frequencies and binocular disparities. Rigorous control over vergence was maintained during testing, and a forced-choice procedure was used. The resulting contrast sensitivity function for stereopsis revealed sensitivity over a greater range of disparities at low than at high spatial frequencies. Sensitivity peaked for large disparities at low spatial frequencies and for small disparities at high spatial frequencies. When disparities were converted to effective binocular phase differences, the variation of contrast sensitivity with phase followed a consistent pattern across spatial frequencies, with peak sensitivity occurring mainly for binocular phases of between 90 degrees and 180 degrees. These results have implications for the extent of spatial integration at the input to the disparity sensing mechanism. A model postulating a spread of positional disparities independent of the spatial frequency selectivity of disparity-sensitive units cannot account for the results. But the size-disparity correlation strongly evident in our data is predicted by certain models of stereopsis, such as phase disparity encoding. An ideal observer analysis is developed that demonstrates that our results were not forced by the nature of the stimulus employed; rather, the quantum efficiency for stereopsis at contrast threshold follows the size-disparity correlation.

[1]  G WESTHEIMER,et al.  Independence of conjugate and disjunctive eye movements , 1961, The Journal of physiology.

[2]  H. Barlow,et al.  A method of determining the overall quantum efficiency of visual discriminations , 1962, The Journal of physiology.

[3]  D. M. Green,et al.  Signal detection theory and psychophysics , 1966 .

[4]  J. Robson,et al.  Application of fourier analysis to the visibility of gratings , 1968, The Journal of physiology.

[5]  B. Julesz.  Foundations of Cyclopean Perception , 1971 .

[6]  H. Levitt.  Transformed up-down methods in psychoacoustics. , 1971, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[7]  R. A. Smith,et al.  Disparity processing of spatial frequencies in man , 1972, The Journal of physiology.

[8]  G C Woo,et al.  The effect of exposure time on the foveal size of Panum's area. , 1974, Vision research.

[9]  C. WILLIAM TYLER,et al.  Depth perception in disparity gratings , 1974, Nature.

[10]  B. Julesz,et al.  Independent Spatial-Frequency-Tuned Channels in Binocular Fusion and Rivalry , 1975 .

[11]  J. Mayhew,et al.  Rivalrous texture stereograms , 1976, Nature.

[12]  O. Mitchell.  Effect of spatial frequency on the visibility of unstructured patterns. , 1976, Journal of the Optical Society of America.

[13]  J. J. KULIKOWSKI,et al.  Limit of single vision in stereopsis depends on contour sharpness , 1978, Nature.

[14]  J. Mayhew,et al.  Contrast Sensitivity Function for Stereopsis , 1978, Perception.

[15]  T. Poggio,et al.  A computational theory of human stereo vision , 1979, Proceedings of the Royal Society of London. Series B. Biological Sciences.

[16]  J. Mayhew,et al.  Convergent disparity discriminations in narrow-band-filtered random-dot stereograms , 1979, Vision Research.

[17]  S. McKee,et al.  Stereoscopic acuity with defocused and spatially filtered retinal images , 1980 .

[18]  J P Frisby,et al.  The Computation of Binocular Edges , 1980, Perception.

[19]  J. Mayhew,et al.  Vergence Eye Movements Made in Response to Spatial-Frequency-Filtered Random-Dot Stereograms , 1981, Perception.

[20]  Christopher W. Tyler,et al.  Spatio-temporal properties of Panum's fusional area , 1981, Vision Research.

[21]  J. Robson,et al.  Discrimination at threshold: Labelled detectors in human vision , 1981, Vision Research.

[22]  D. Ferster.  A comparison of binocular depth mechanisms in areas 17 and 18 of the cat visual cortex , 1981, The Journal of physiology.

[23]  Kenneth Pulliam,et al.  Spatial Frequency Analysis Of Three-Dimensional Vision , 1982, Optics & Photonics.

[24]  Dennis M. Levi,et al.  Spatial localization in normal and amblyopic vision , 1983, Vision Research.

[25]  C. Schor,et al.  Disparity range for local stereopsis as a function of luminance spatial frequency , 1983, Vision Research.

[26]  A. Norcia,et al.  Temporal frequency limits for stereoscopic apparent motion processes , 1984, Vision Research.

[27]  C. Schor,et al.  Spatial tuning of static and dynamic local stereopsis , 1984, Vision Research.

[28]  C. Schor,et al.  Binocular sensory fusion is limited by spatial resolution , 1984, Vision Research.

[29]  E H Adelson,et al.  Spatiotemporal energy models for the perception of motion. , 1985, Journal of the Optical Society of America. A, Optics and image science.

[30]  K. Nakayama,et al.  Detection and discrimination of sinusoidal grating displacements. , 1985, Journal of the Optical Society of America. A, Optics and image science.

[31]  D. Badcock,et al.  Depth-increment detection function for individual spatial channels. , 1985, Journal of the Optical Society of America. A, Optics and image science.

[32]  Jeffrey B. Mulligan,et al.  Reciprocity between luminance and dot density in the perception of brightness , 1988, Vision Research.

[33]  R. Blake,et al.  How Contrast Affects Stereoacuity , 1988, Perception.

[34]  Hugh R. Wilson,et al.  10 – THE PERCEPTION OF FORM: Retina to Striate Cortex , 1989 .

[35]  Gordon E. Legge,et al.  Stereopsis and contrast , 1989, Vision Research.

[36]  S. Lehky,et al.  Neural model of stereoacuity and depth interpolation based on a distributed representation of stereo disparity [published erratum appears in J Neurosci 1991 Mar;11(3):following Table of Contents] , 1990, The Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience.

[37]  I. Ohzawa,et al.  On the neurophysiological organization of binocular vision , 1990, Vision Research.

[38]  D. Pelli.  The quantum efficiency of vision , 1990 .

[39]  S. McKee,et al.  The imprecision of stereopsis , 1990, Vision Research.

[40]  I. Ohzawa,et al.  Stereoscopic depth discrimination in the visual cortex: neurons ideally suited as disparity detectors. , 1990, Science.

[41]  H. Wilson,et al.  Coarse spatial scales constrain the range of binocular fusion on fine scales. , 1991, Journal of the Optical Society of America. A, Optics and image science.

[42]  Denis G. Pelli,et al.  Accurate control of contrast on microcomputer displays , 1991, Vision Research.

[43]  H. Wilson,et al.  Neural models of stereoscopic vision , 1991, Trends in Neurosciences.

[44]  Gregory C. DeAngelis,et al.  Depth is encoded in the visual cortex by a specialized receptive field structure , 1991, Nature.

[45]  R. Blake,et al.  Spatial frequency tuning of human stereopsis , 1991, Vision Research.

[46]  A. Parker,et al.  Efficiency of stereopsis in random-dot stereograms. , 1992, Journal of the Optical Society of America. A, Optics and image science.

[47]  Lawrence K. Cormack,et al.  Disparity tuning in mechanisms of human stereopsis , 1992, Vision Research.

[48]  Jitendra Malik,et al.  Computational framework for determining stereo correspondence from a set of linear spatial filters , 1992, Image Vis. Comput..

[49]  L K Cormack,et al.  Disparity-tuned channels of the human visual system , 1993, Visual Neuroscience.

[50]  A. Parker,et al.  An orientation-tuned component in the contrast masking of stereopsis , 1993, Vision Research.

[51]  Christopher W. Tyler,et al.  Analysis of stereothresholds for stimuli below 2.5 c/deg , 1994, Vision Research.

[52]  H. Smallman.  Fine-to-coarse scale disambiguation in stereopsis , 1995, Vision Research.

[53]  2. On the Knowledge of Distance given by Binocular Visions. , .