Remote Tactile Transmission with Time Delay for Robotic Master–Slave Systems

This study develops a method to compensate for the communication time delay for tactile transmission systems. For transmitting tactile information from remote sites, the communication time delay degrades the validity of feedback. However, so far time delay compensation methods for tactile transmissions have yet to be proposed. For visual or force feedback systems, local models of remote environments were adopted for compensating the communication delay. The local models cancel the perceived time delay in sensory feedback signals by synchronizing them with the users' operating movements. The objectives of this study are to extend the idea of the local model to tactile feedback systems and develop a system that delivers tactile roughness of textures from remote environments to the users of the system. The local model for tactile roughness is designed to reproduce the characteristic cutaneous deformations, including vibratory frequencies and amplitudes, similar to those that occur when a human finger scans rough textures. Physical properties in the local model are updated in real-time by a tactile sensor installed on the slave-side robot. Experiments to deliver the perceived roughness of textures were performed using the developed system. The results showed that the developed system can deliver the perceived roughness of textures. When the communication time delay was simulated, it was confirmed that the developed system eliminated the time delay perceived by the operators. This study concludes that the developed local model is effective for remote tactile transmissions.

[1]  Katherine J. Kuchenbecker,et al.  Improving telerobotic touch via high-frequency acceleration matching , 2006, Proceedings 2006 IEEE International Conference on Robotics and Automation, 2006. ICRA 2006..

[2]  Kenneth O. Johnson,et al.  Neural Coding Mechanisms Underlying Perceived Roughness of Finely Textured Surfaces , 2001, The Journal of Neuroscience.

[3]  Ronald S. Fearing,et al.  Some basic issues in teletaction , 1997, Proceedings of International Conference on Robotics and Automation.

[4]  Chih-Hung King,et al.  A Haptic Feedback System for Lower-Limb Prostheses , 2008, IEEE Transactions on Neural Systems and Rehabilitation Engineering.

[5]  Won S. Kim,et al.  The phantom robot: predictive displays for teleoperation with time delay , 1990, Proceedings., IEEE International Conference on Robotics and Automation.

[6]  Takashi Maeno,et al.  Development of a Texture Sensor Emulating the Tissue Structure and Perceptual Mechanism of Human Fingers , 2005, Proceedings of the 2005 IEEE International Conference on Robotics and Automation.

[7]  Masatoshi Ishikawa,et al.  Development of a system for experiencing tactile sensation from a robot hand by electrically stimulating sensory nerve fiber , 2003, 2003 IEEE International Conference on Robotics and Automation (Cat. No.03CH37422).

[8]  Robert D. Howe,et al.  Tactile Display of High-Frequency Information in Teleoperation and Virtual Environments. , 1995 .

[9]  Kevin Warwick,et al.  The application of implant technology for cybernetic systems. , 2003, Archives of neurology.

[10]  Darwin G. Caldwell,et al.  Enhanced tactile feedback (tele-taction) using a multi-functional sensory system , 1993, [1993] Proceedings IEEE International Conference on Robotics and Automation.

[11]  Robert D. Howe,et al.  Remote palpation technology , 1995 .

[12]  Allison M. Okamura,et al.  Vibration feedback models for virtual environments , 1998, Proceedings. 1998 IEEE International Conference on Robotics and Automation (Cat. No.98CH36146).

[13]  Satoshi Tadokoro,et al.  A tactile synthesis method using multiple frequency vibrations for representing virtual touch , 2005, 2005 IEEE/RSJ International Conference on Intelligent Robots and Systems.

[14]  M. Hollins,et al.  Evidence for the duplex theory of tactile texture perception , 2000, Perception & psychophysics.

[15]  Tetsuo Kotoku A Predictive Display With Force Feedback And Its Application To Remote Manipulation System With Transmission Time Delay , 1992, Proceedings of the IEEE/RSJ International Conference on Intelligent Robots and Systems.

[16]  K. Sathian,et al.  Temporal Cues Contribute to Tactile Perception of Roughness , 2001, The Journal of Neuroscience.

[17]  Ehud Ahissar,et al.  Importance of Temporal Cues for Tactile Spatial- Frequency Discrimination , 2001, The Journal of Neuroscience.

[18]  Abderrahmane Kheddar,et al.  Teleoperation based on the hidden robot concept , 2001, IEEE Trans. Syst. Man Cybern. Part A.

[19]  Pradeep K. Khosla,et al.  Psychophysical Characterization and Testbed Validation of a Wearable Vibrotactile Glove for Telemanipulation , 2003, Presence: Teleoperators & Virtual Environments.

[20]  Akio Yamamoto,et al.  Electrostatic Tactile Display with Thin Film Slider and Its Application to Tactile Telepresentation Systems , 2006, IEEE Trans. Vis. Comput. Graph..

[21]  Vincent Hayward,et al.  A tactile enhancement instrument for minimally invasive surgery , 2005, Computer aided surgery : official journal of the International Society for Computer Aided Surgery.

[22]  Maria V. Ottermo,et al.  Requirements for the , 2000 .

[23]  S. Lederman Tactual roughness perception: Spatial and temporal determinants. , 1983 .

[24]  Robert D. Howe,et al.  Tactile Display of Vibratory Information in Teleoperation and Virtual Environments , 1995, Presence: Teleoperators & Virtual Environments.

[25]  A. Goodwin,et al.  Tactile discrimination of gratings , 2004, Experimental Brain Research.

[26]  Satoshi Tadokoro,et al.  Identification of cutaneous detection thresholds against time-delay stimuli for tactile displays , 2008, 2008 IEEE International Conference on Robotics and Automation.

[27]  R. Howe,et al.  Vibrotactile Feedback for Industrial Telemanipulators , 1997, Dynamic Systems and Control.