Men Are Dogs (and Women Too)

One of the primary differences between humans and other animals is our capacity for high level cognition and the use of language. Historically, AI has understandably focused on duplicating these aspects of human behavior, and selected its architectures accordingly. However, humans are nevertheless social mammals and share a large part of the mammalian behavior repertoire, such as fight, flight, and feed, as well as social behaviors, such as attachment, affiliation, territoriality, and the formation of dominance hierarchies. In this paper, I will argue that for all our unique capabilities, the mammalian behavior hardware (whatever it may be) is still active in humans, and that for applications such as virtual characters for interactive drama, we should begin from architectures based on our commonalities with other social mammals, rather than from our unique capabilities.

[1]  Mouse Genome Sequencing Consortium.  Initial sequencing and comparative analysis of the mouse genome , 2002, Nature.

[2]  F. Callard.  The Body in Theory , 1998 .

[3]  C. Norra,et al.  Theories of Delusional Disorders , 2007, Psychopathology.

[4]  S. Suomi.  Attachment in rhesus monkeys. , 1999 .

[5]  P. Maes,et al.  Old tricks, new dogs: ethology and interactive creatures , 1997 .

[6]  Marc Cavazza,et al.  Madame bovary on the holodeck: immersive interactive storytelling , 2007, ACM Multimedia.

[7]  J. Bowlby.  Attachment and loss: retrospect and prospect. , 1969, The American journal of orthopsychiatry.

[8]  Colin N. Dewey,et al.  Initial sequencing and comparative analysis of the mouse genome. , 2002 .

[9]  John E. Laird,et al.  Human-Level AI's Killer Application: Interactive Computer Games , 2000, AI Mag..

[10]  J. Cassidy.  The nature of the child's ties. , 1999 .

[11]  J. Baudrillard.  Simulacra and Simulation , 1981 .

[12]  Robert McKee,et al.  Story: Substance, Structure, Style, and the Principles of Screenwriting , 1997 .

[13]  S. Porges.  Orienting in a defensive world: mammalian modifications of our evolutionary heritage. A Polyvagal Theory. , 1995, Psychophysiology.

[14]  Joseph Bates,et al.  The role of emotion in believable agents , 1994, CACM.

[15]  Fred Waitzkin.  Searching for Bobby Fischer , 1988 .

[16]  Elsa Broder,et al.  Handbook of Attachment. , 2003 .

[17]  Allen Newell,et al.  SOAR: An Architecture for General Intelligence , 1987, Artif. Intell..

[18]  K. K. Kienlen,et al.  Developmental and Social Antecedents of Stalking , 1998 .

[19]  Phoebe Sengers,et al.  Do the thing right: an architecture for action-expression , 1998, AGENTS '98.

[20]  Judith A. Feeney,et al.  Adult romantic attachment and couple relationships , 1999 .

[21]  A. Newell.  Unified Theories of Cognition , 1990 .

[22]  Stacy Marsella,et al.  Tears and fears: modeling emotions and emotional behaviors in synthetic agents , 2001, AGENTS '01.

[23]  W. S. Reilly,et al.  Believable Social and Emotional Agents. , 1996 .

[24]  Erann Gat,et al.  Experiences with an architecture for intelligent, reactive agents , 1997, J. Exp. Theor. Artif. Intell..

[25]  C. Hazan,et al.  Romantic love conceptualized as an attachment process. , 1987, Journal of personality and social psychology.

[26]  Andrew Stern,et al.  A Behavior Language for Story-Based Believable Agents , 2002, IEEE Intell. Syst..

[27]  John R. Anderson.  ACT: A simple theory of complex cognition. , 1996 .