The D-Day, V-Day, and bleak days of a disruptive technology: A new model for ex-ante evaluation of the timing of technology disruption

The recent failure of major PC and smartphone makers in launching new generations of high-tech products in time shows that analyzing and capturing the timing of technology disruption is an important yet less explored research area. This paper conducts theoretical and empirical analyses for ex-ante quantitative evaluation of the timing of technology disruption. We conceptualize the ease and network factors as key determinants of performance improvement for a disruptive technology. A dynamic consumer model is developed to identify two critical times, termed D-Day and V-Day, of technology disruption. We also show that, if the network factor dominates the performance improvement process, there may exist some “bleak days” during which a firm would discontinue a “promising” technology that will eventually disrupt. Empirical tests are conducted with data of hard disk drives, semiconductor technologies, and CPU performance for mobile devices to verify key model assumptions and to show how to estimate the ease and network factors. We also perform a numerical experiment to demonstrate how to forecast the timing of technology disruption. A decision tree and a systematic framework are also developed to operationalize key model parameters and analytical results from a decision-support perspective. This paper contributes to the literature by presenting a novel analytical tool and new insights for high-tech companies to forecast and manage the timing of technology disruption.

[1]  F. Bass A new product growth model for consumer durables , 1976 .

[2]  J. Tirole The Theory of Industrial Organization , 1988 .

[3]  Ron Adner When Are Technologies Disruptive: A Demand-Based View of the Emergence of Competition , 2002 .

[4]  Yuxin Chen,et al.  Context-Dependent Preferences and Innovation Strategy , 2013, Manag. Sci..

[5]  Greys Sošić,et al.  Analysis of Industry Equilibria in Models with Sustaining and Disruptive Technology , 2010 .

[6]  Cheryl T. Druehl,et al.  A Strategy for Opening a New Market and Encroaching on the Lower End of the Existing Market , 2008 .

[7]  Michael D. Hutt Business Marketing Management , 1998 .

[8]  Clayton M. Christensen The Innovator's Dilemma , 1997 .

[9]  Clayton M. Christensen The Rigid Disk Drive Industry: A History of Commercial and Technological Turbulence , 1993, Business History Review.

[10]  Chialin Chen,et al.  Design for the Environment: A Quality-Based Model for Green Product Development , 2001, Manag. Sci..

[11]  Ron Adner,et al.  A DEMAND-BASED PERSPECTIVE ON TECHNOLOGY LIFE CYCLES , 2004 .

[12]  R. V. Wyk Innovation: The attacker's advantage : Richard N. Foster 316 pages, £14.95 (London, Macmillan, 1986) , 1987 .

[13]  G. Lilien,et al.  Handbook of Business-to-Business Marketing , 2012 .

[14]  James M. Utterback,et al.  Mastering the Dynamics of Innovation , 1996 .

[15]  Philip R Christensen,et al.  The many faces of Mars. , 2005, Scientific American.

[16]  C. Anthony Di Benedetto,et al.  Diffusion of Innovation , 2015 .

[17]  Michael E. Raynor,et al.  The Innovator's Solution: Creating and Sustaining Successful Growth , 2003 .

[18]  Vijay Mahajan,et al.  Chapter 8 New-product diffusion models , 1993, Marketing.

[19]  Ron Adner,et al.  Disruptive Technologies and the Emergence of Competition , 2003 .

[20]  Clayton M. Christensen EXPLORING THE LIMITS OF THE TECHNOLOGY S‐CURVE. PART I: COMPONENT TECHNOLOGIES , 1992 .

[21]  Carliss Y. Baldwin,et al.  Modularity in the Design of Complex Engineering Systems , 2006 .

[22]  Srinagesh Gavirneni,et al.  Supply chains in the presence of store brands , 2013, Eur. J. Oper. Res..

[23]  Doug McDavid,et al.  A New Way to Plan for the Future , 2007, 2007 40th Annual Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences (HICSS'07).

[24]  Barrie R. Nault,et al.  Disruptive Technologies: Explaining Entry in Next Generation Information Technology Markets , 2000, Inf. Syst. Res..

[25]  Frank M. Bass,et al.  A New Product Growth for Model Consumer Durables , 2004, Manag. Sci..

[26]  John R. Hauser,et al.  Design and marketing of new products , 1980 .

[27]  Donald R. Lehmann,et al.  A Meta-Analysis of Applications of Diffusion Models , 1990 .

[28]  Ji Zhu,et al.  Predicting the Path of Technological Innovation: SAW Versus Moore, Bass, Gompertz, and Kryder , 2012, Mark. Sci..

[29]  André de Palma,et al.  Discrete Choice Theory of Product Differentiation , 1995 .

[30]  M. Tushman,et al.  Technological Discontinuities and Dominant Designs: A Cyclical Model of Technological Change , 1990 .

[31]  John R. Hauser,et al.  Defensive Marketing Strategies , 2008, Mark. Sci..

[32]  Clayton M. Christensen EXPLORING THE LIMITS OF THE TECHNOLOGY S‐CURVE. PART II: ARCHITECTURAL TECHNOLOGIES , 1992 .

[33]  ZhuJi,et al.  Predicting the Path of Technological Innovation , 2012 .

[34]  Ashish Sood,et al.  Demystifying Disruption: A New Model for Understanding and Predicting Disruptive Technologies , 2010, Mark. Sci..

[35]  Elmar Kiesling,et al.  Innovation diffusion of repeat purchase products in a competitive market: An agent-based simulation approach , 2015, Eur. J. Oper. Res..

[36]  C. Walter Kryder's law. , 2005, Scientific American.

[37]  S. Auty Using Conjoint Analysis in Industrial Marketing The Role of Judgment , 1995 .

[38]  P. Schoemaker Scenario Planning: A Tool for Strategic Thinking , 1995 .

[39]  Ana Aizcorbe,et al.  The Role of Semiconductor Inputs in it Hardware Price Decline: Computers Vs. Communications , 2002 .

[40]  Peter M. Kort,et al.  New product introduction and capacity investment by incumbents: Effects of size on strategy , 2013, Eur. J. Oper. Res..

[41]  Clayton M. Christensen,et al.  Disruptive Technologies: Catching the Wave , 1995 .

[42]  Oded Netzer,et al.  Extending Compromise Effect Models to Complex Buying Situations and Other Context Effects , 2004 .