Predicting bias in perceived position using attention field models.

Attention is the mechanism through which we select relevant information from our visual environment. We have recently demonstrated that attention attracts receptive fields across the visual hierarchy (Klein, Harvey, & Dumoulin, 2014). We captured this receptive field attraction using an attention field model. Here, we apply this model to human perception: We predict that receptive field attraction results in a bias in perceived position, which depends on the size of the underlying receptive fields. We instructed participants to compare the relative position of Gabor stimuli, while we manipulated the focus of attention using exogenous cueing. We varied the eccentric position and spatial frequency of the Gabor stimuli to vary underlying receptive field size. The positional biases as a function of eccentricity matched the predictions by an attention field model, whereas the bias as a function of spatial frequency did not. As spatial frequency and eccentricity are encoded differently across the visual hierarchy, we speculate that they might interact differently with the attention field that is spatially defined.

[1]  Jan Theeuwes,et al.  The size of an attentional window modulates attentional capture by color singletons , 2007, Psychonomic bulletin & review.

[2]  Alexander G. Huth,et al.  Attention During Natural Vision Warps Semantic Representation Across the Human Brain , 2013, Nature Neuroscience.

[3]  E. Miller,et al.  Top-Down Versus Bottom-Up Control of Attention in the Prefrontal and Posterior Parietal Cortices , 2007, Science.

[4]  Francesca C. Fortenbaugh,et al.  Where does attention go when it moves? Spatial properties and locus of the attentional repulsion effect. , 2010, Journal of vision.

[5]  D G Pelli,et al.  The VideoToolbox software for visual psychophysics: transforming numbers into movies. , 1997, Spatial vision.

[6]  Brian A. Wandell,et al.  Population receptive field estimates in human visual cortex , 2008, NeuroImage.

[7]  M. Posner,et al.  Orienting of Attention* , 1980, The Quarterly journal of experimental psychology.

[8]  S. Dumoulin,et al.  The Relationship between Cortical Magnification Factor and Population Receptive Field Size in Human Visual Cortex: Constancies in Cortical Architecture , 2011, The Journal of Neuroscience.

[9]  D. Heeger,et al.  The Normalization Model of Attention , 2009, Neuron.

[10]  P. Cavanagh,et al.  Focused attention distorts visual space: an attentional repulsion effect. , 1997, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[11]  D. G. Albrecht,et al.  Spatial frequency selectivity of cells in macaque visual cortex , 1982, Vision Research.

[12]  B. Dosher,et al.  Spatial attention: different mechanisms for central and peripheral temporal precues? , 2000, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[13]  Y. Benjamini,et al.  Controlling the false discovery rate: a practical and powerful approach to multiple testing , 1995 .

[14]  Orit Baruch,et al.  Attentional attraction of receptive fields can explain spatial and temporal effects of attention , 2014 .

[15]  Albert Costa,et al.  The size of an attentional window affects working memory guidance , 2010, Attention, perception & psychophysics.

[16]  B. C. Motter Focal attention produces spatially selective processing in visual cortical areas V1, V2, and V4 in the presence of competing stimuli. , 1993, Journal of neurophysiology.

[17]  Stefan Treue,et al.  Temporal dynamics of neuronal modulation during exogenous and endogenous shifts of visual attention in macaque area MT , 2008, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[18]  D. Hubel,et al.  Receptive fields, binocular interaction and functional architecture in the cat's visual cortex , 1962, The Journal of physiology.

[19]  M. Carrasco,et al.  On the flexibility of sustained attention and its effects on a texture segmentation task , 2008, Vision Research.

[20]  John H. R. Maunsell,et al.  The visual field representation in striate cortex of the macaque monkey: Asymmetries, anisotropies, and individual variability , 1984, Vision Research.

[21]  M. Corbetta,et al.  Control of goal-directed and stimulus-driven attention in the brain , 2002, Nature Reviews Neuroscience.

[22]  D. Heeger,et al.  Spatial attention affects brain activity in human primary visual cortex. , 1999, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[23]  R. Klein,et al.  Is Posner's "beam" the same as Treisman's "glue"?: On the relation between visual orienting and feature integration theory. , 1987, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[24]  R. Wurtz,et al.  Brain circuits for the internal monitoring of movements. , 2008, Annual review of neuroscience.

[25]  D. Heeger,et al.  When size matters: attention affects performance by contrast or response gain , 2010, Nature Neuroscience.

[26]  K. Nakayama,et al.  Sustained and transient components of focal visual attention , 1989, Vision Research.

[27]  Lynn C. Robertson,et al.  Visual spatial attention enhances the amplitude of positive and negative fMRI responses to visual stimulation in an eccentricity-dependent manner , 2013, Vision Research.

[28]  J. Pratt,et al.  Misperceiving space following shifts of attention: Determining the locus of the attentional repulsion effect , 2012, Vision Research.

[29]  A. Watson,et al.  Quest: A Bayesian adaptive psychometric method , 1983, Perception & psychophysics.

[30]  R. Wurtz Neuronal mechanisms of visual stability , 2008, Vision Research.

[31]  M. Carrasco,et al.  Transient Attention Enhances Perceptual Performance and fMRI Response in Human Visual Cortex , 2005, Neuron.

[32]  D H Brainard,et al.  The Psychophysics Toolbox. , 1997, Spatial vision.

[33]  Marisa Carrasco,et al.  Attention improves or impairs visual performance by enhancing spatial resolution , 1998, Nature.

[34]  J. Gallant,et al.  Combined effects of spatial and feature-based attention on responses of V4 neurons , 2009, Vision Research.

[35]  K. Briand,et al.  Feature integration and spatial attention : More evidence of a dissociation between endogenous and exogenous orienting , 1998 .

[36]  J. Gallant,et al.  Attention to Stimulus Features Shifts Spectral Tuning of V4 Neurons during Natural Vision , 2008, Neuron.

[37]  T. Womelsdorf,et al.  Receptive Field Shift and Shrinkage in Macaque Middle Temporal Area through Attentional Gain Modulation , 2008, The Journal of Neuroscience.

[38]  P. Cavanagh,et al.  The Spatial Resolution of Visual Attention , 2001, Cognitive Psychology.

[39]  Patrick Cavanagh,et al.  Attentive tracking shifts the perceived location of a nearby flash , 2005, Vision Research.

[40]  M. Carrasco,et al.  Attention alters appearance , 2004, Nature Neuroscience.

[41]  Edgar A DeYoe,et al.  The Attentional Field Revealed by Single-Voxel Modeling of fMRI Time Courses , 2015, The Journal of Neuroscience.

[42]  M. Cheal,et al.  Importance of precue location in directing attention. , 1991, Acta psychologica.

[43]  J. P. Jones,et al.  An evaluation of the two-dimensional Gabor filter model of simple receptive fields in cat striate cortex. , 1987, Journal of neurophysiology.

[44]  D. Somers,et al.  Functional MRI reveals spatially specific attentional modulation in human primary visual cortex. , 1999, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[45]  Serge O. Dumoulin,et al.  Attraction of Position Preference by Spatial Attention throughout Human Visual Cortex , 2014, Neuron.