Adaptive compressed sensing — A new class of self-organizing coding models for neuroscience

Sparse coding networks, which utilize unsupervised learning to maximize coding efficiency, have successfully reproduced response properties found in primary visual cortex [1]. However, conventional sparse coding models require that the coding circuit can fully sample the sensory data in a one-to-one fashion, a requirement not supported by experimental data from the thalamo-cortical projection. To relieve these strict wiring requirements, we propose a sparse coding network constructed by introducing synaptic learning in the framework of compressed sensing. We demonstrate a new model that evolves biologically realistic, spatially smooth receptive fields despite the fact that the feedforward connectivity subsamples the input and thus the learning must rely on an impoverished and distorted account of the original visual data. Further, we demonstrate that the model could form a general scheme of cortical communication: it can form meaningful representations in a secondary sensory area, which receives input from the primary sensory area through a “compressing” cortico-cortical projection. Finally, we prove that our model belongs to a new class of sparse coding algorithms in which recurrent connections are essential in forming the spatial receptive fields.

[1]  E.J. Candes,et al.  An Introduction To Compressive Sampling , 2008, IEEE Signal Processing Magazine.

[2]  L. Rebollo-Neira,et al.  Optimized orthogonal matching pursuit approach , 2002, IEEE Signal Processing Letters.

[3]  Hyun Sung Chang,et al.  Learning Compressed Sensing , 2007 .

[4]  E. Candès,et al.  Stable signal recovery from incomplete and inaccurate measurements , 2005, math/0503066.

[5]  A. Lansner Associative memory models: from the cell-assembly theory to biophysically detailed cortex simulations , 2009, Trends in Neurosciences.

[6]  Wotao Yin,et al.  Bregman Iterative Algorithms for (cid:2) 1 -Minimization with Applications to Compressed Sensing ∗ , 2008 .

[7]  Michael N. Shadlen,et al.  Noise, neural codes and cortical organization , 1994, Current Opinion in Neurobiology.

[8]  P. Fiildihk,et al.  Forming sparse representations by local anti-Hebbian learning , 1990 .

[9]  Terrence J. Sejnowski,et al.  The “independent components” of natural scenes are edge filters , 1997, Vision Research.

[10]  G. Palm Neural Assemblies , 1982, Studies of Brain Function.

[11]  D. Hubel,et al.  Receptive fields, binocular interaction and functional architecture in the cat's visual cortex , 1962, The Journal of physiology.

[12]  R. Reid,et al.  Synaptic Integration in Striate Cortical Simple Cells , 1998, The Journal of Neuroscience.

[13]  A. Schüz,et al.  Quantitative aspects of corticocortical connections: a tracer study in the mouse. , 2006, Cerebral cortex.

[14]  Horace Barlow,et al.  Understanding Natural Vision , 1983 .

[15]  M. Stryker,et al.  Relation of cortical cell orientation selectivity to alignment of receptive fields of the geniculocortical afferents that arborize within a single orientation column in ferret visual cortex , 1991, The Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience.

[16]  Charles R. Johnson,et al.  Topics in Matrix Analysis , 1991 .

[17]  P. Földiák,et al.  Forming sparse representations by local anti-Hebbian learning , 1990, Biological Cybernetics.

[18]  William T Newsome,et al.  Is there a signal in the noise? , 1995, Current Opinion in Neurobiology.

[19]  R. Reid,et al.  Specificity of monosynaptic connections from thalamus to visual cortex , 1995, Nature.

[20]  D. Ferster,et al.  Neural mechanisms of orientation selectivity in the visual cortex. , 2000, Annual review of neuroscience.

[21]  Martin Rehn,et al.  A network that uses few active neurones to code visual input predicts the diverse shapes of cortical receptive fields , 2007, Journal of Computational Neuroscience.

[22]  F. Attneave Some informational aspects of visual perception. , 1954, Psychological review.

[23]  T. Hromádka,et al.  Sparse Representation of Sounds in the Unanesthetized Auditory Cortex , 2008, PLoS biology.

[24]  David J. Field,et al.  Emergence of simple-cell receptive field properties by learning a sparse code for natural images , 1996, Nature.

[25]  M. DeWeese,et al.  Non-Gaussian Membrane Potential Dynamics Imply Sparse, Synchronous Activity in Auditory Cortex , 2006, The Journal of Neuroscience.

[26]  Richard G. Baraniuk,et al.  Sparse Coding via Thresholding and Local Competition in Neural Circuits , 2008, Neural Computation.